Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 66 (9164 total)
6 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,465 Year: 3,722/9,624 Month: 593/974 Week: 206/276 Day: 46/34 Hour: 2/6


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Homosexuality, the natural choice? (Gay Animals are Common)
RAZD
Member (Idle past 1427 days)
Posts: 20714
From: the other end of the sidewalk
Joined: 03-14-2004


Message 34 of 306 (373629)
01-02-2007 7:51 AM
Reply to: Message 33 by platypus
01-02-2007 1:44 AM


Re: a benefit
A group that is more cohesive and cares for each other is more likely to survive.
Look at bonobos and the way they use sex to defuse tension between members in thier groups.
Not that their survival is guaranteed ....
Enjoy.
Edited by RAZD, : survival

Join the effort to unravel AIDS/HIV, unfold Proteomes, fight Cancer,
compare Fiocruz Genome and fight Muscular Dystrophy with Team EvC! (click)


we are limited in our ability to understand
by our ability to understand
RebelAAmericanOZen[Deist
... to learn ... to think ... to live ... to laugh ...
to share.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 33 by platypus, posted 01-02-2007 1:44 AM platypus has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 35 by Fosdick, posted 01-03-2007 1:19 PM RAZD has replied

RAZD
Member (Idle past 1427 days)
Posts: 20714
From: the other end of the sidewalk
Joined: 03-14-2004


Message 36 of 306 (374119)
01-03-2007 6:07 PM
Reply to: Message 35 by Fosdick
01-03-2007 1:19 PM


a benefit or not ...
Not that I have seen.
The male-male behavior that is documented is "penis-fencing" - a rubbing behavior similar to female-female clitoris rubbing. Nor has this been documented as occurring after male-female sex the way the female-female rubbing is.
Nor is there documentation of fisting and other more esoterotic human behaviors.
The females seems to dominate and are more sexual than the males, which may be a crucial difference.
See
Loading...
The Bonobo Page (Prof. W. H. Calvin)
http://weber.ucsd.edu/%7Ejmoore/publications/Stanford.html
I think one thing to consider with the Bonobos, is that there is virtually no sexual selection because sex is shared so frequently and willingly, and this may have resulted in Bonobos being overall less fit than Chimps, thus explaining why there are one kind of Bonobos and three kinds of Chimps.
This would be kind of like our removal of a lot of natural selection through medicine, but without the benefit of the medicine.
I also think that sexual selection played a significant role in human development, driving the rapid development of neoteny features, apparent bareness, long head hair, large penises, longer and more frequent intercourse, mating rituals (art and music), and large brains. See Sexual Selection, Stasis, Runaway Selection, Dimorphism, & Human Evolution
and
Server Migration Notice
Department of Psychology | The University of New Mexico
Enjoy.

Join the effort to unravel AIDS/HIV, unfold Proteomes, fight Cancer,
compare Fiocruz Genome and fight Muscular Dystrophy with Team EvC! (click)


we are limited in our ability to understand
by our ability to understand
RebelAAmericanOZen[Deist
... to learn ... to think ... to live ... to laugh ...
to share.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 35 by Fosdick, posted 01-03-2007 1:19 PM Fosdick has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 37 by Fosdick, posted 01-03-2007 7:50 PM RAZD has replied

RAZD
Member (Idle past 1427 days)
Posts: 20714
From: the other end of the sidewalk
Joined: 03-14-2004


Message 38 of 306 (374289)
01-03-2007 11:57 PM
Reply to: Message 37 by Fosdick
01-03-2007 7:50 PM


Re: a benefit or not ...
Given that dogs will lick themselves to masturbate (why? because they can ...) as well as sniff and lick each other, I don't think it is a difference in kind of behavior so much as a difference in degree.
... some kind of perverse bottlenecking brought on by civilization ...
Or like dog masturbation it is because we can do it and it feels good to those that like it.
I'm not sure that civilization has much to do with it, other than increasing the likelihood that people of like minds will find each other.
Or the effect of civilization has some hormonal effect we have yet to discern. We know that households of women living together have tended to caused the women to align their menstrual cycles to the same rhythm, so there could also be an effect on women in houses dominated by males (especially male children) to have a hormonal effect that influences the development of new male children.
Or it could be a build up of anti-bodies to male hormones from previous children developing in the womb and suffusing the mother with a surfeit of male hormones that her body objects to.
Or it could be all three in differing degrees.
Enjoy.

Join the effort to unravel AIDS/HIV, unfold Proteomes, fight Cancer,
compare Fiocruz Genome and fight Muscular Dystrophy with Team EvC! (click)


we are limited in our ability to understand
by our ability to understand
RebelAAmericanOZen[Deist
... to learn ... to think ... to live ... to laugh ...
to share.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 37 by Fosdick, posted 01-03-2007 7:50 PM Fosdick has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 39 by Fosdick, posted 01-04-2007 12:59 PM RAZD has replied

RAZD
Member (Idle past 1427 days)
Posts: 20714
From: the other end of the sidewalk
Joined: 03-14-2004


Message 40 of 306 (374589)
01-04-2007 9:55 PM
Reply to: Message 39 by Fosdick
01-04-2007 12:59 PM


Re: a benefit or not ...
Aferwards I expect them to learn how to turn it on and off. And after that being gay will be entirely a matter of choice.
Then we can attack the important issues, like being blond.
If there is a gay gene on the Y chromosome or any where else I suppose scientists will locate it.
I think it is affected by several locii not just one, and that these are susceptible to womb environmental factors during development, so "eliminating" the gene(s) won't necessarily eliminate the behavior.
Enjoy.

Join the effort to unravel AIDS/HIV, unfold Proteomes, fight Cancer,
compare Fiocruz Genome and fight Muscular Dystrophy with Team EvC! (click)


we are limited in our ability to understand
by our ability to understand
RebelAAmericanOZen[Deist
... to learn ... to think ... to live ... to laugh ...
to share.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 39 by Fosdick, posted 01-04-2007 12:59 PM Fosdick has not replied

RAZD
Member (Idle past 1427 days)
Posts: 20714
From: the other end of the sidewalk
Joined: 03-14-2004


Message 42 of 306 (374636)
01-05-2007 1:51 AM
Reply to: Message 32 by Taz
12-31-2006 9:04 PM


Re: Experiments that claim to ”cure’ homosexual rams spark anger
I can't help but relate this to the movie X-Men 3 The Last Stand.
Obviously. And for the same reason - xenophobia of what you don't understand. One of the great reasons for culture wars down through history eh? "They are different, therefore bad" has been one of the mainstays, and is particularly virulent in the religiuos culture wars where it becomes "They are different, therefore wrong, therefore evil, and evil must be wiped out" ...
It seems to me that if we are going to eliminate some genetic predisposition in people we could do well to start with one that has caused a lot of bloodshed and grief -- the "religious gene" -- and get rid of the religious wars.
Enjoy.

Join the effort to unravel AIDS/HIV, unfold Proteomes, fight Cancer,
compare Fiocruz Genome and fight Muscular Dystrophy with Team EvC! (click)


we are limited in our ability to understand
by our ability to understand
RebelAAmericanOZen[Deist
... to learn ... to think ... to live ... to laugh ...
to share.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 32 by Taz, posted 12-31-2006 9:04 PM Taz has not replied

RAZD
Member (Idle past 1427 days)
Posts: 20714
From: the other end of the sidewalk
Joined: 03-14-2004


Message 236 of 306 (376141)
01-11-2007 7:39 AM
Reply to: Message 160 by New Cat's Eye
01-10-2007 2:28 PM


Re: 14th Amendment - the OTHER option
Why not create a type of legal agreement that marriage would be a subset of and then let gays enjoy the benefits of the newly created type of legal agreement?
Instead of that why don't we give married folks the same benefits that non-married folk have?
We already have "common-law marriages" where the legal constraints of property etc are extended even though the people are NOT married, so ... the fact of marriage does not matter to what the laws cover.
Lets remove this bit of an archaic past that no longer applies to modern society and move into the 20th century (at least) and put everyone one the same level - relationship recognized for legal purposes based on how you live.
LEGALLY it doesn't matter if you have a piece of paper from a church or whatever, the issue is how you live, so we no longer need to refer to the piece of paper in any legislation.
Only once you have removed the bias against "marriage" (= ownership anyway) from all legal documents will couples be free to enjoy the benefits of the rest of society.
Enjoy.

Join the effort to unravel AIDS/HIV, unfold Proteomes, fight Cancer,
compare Fiocruz Genome and fight Muscular Dystrophy with Team EvC! (click)


we are limited in our ability to understand
by our ability to understand
RebelAAmericanOZen[Deist
... to learn ... to think ... to live ... to laugh ...
to share.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 160 by New Cat's Eye, posted 01-10-2007 2:28 PM New Cat's Eye has not replied

RAZD
Member (Idle past 1427 days)
Posts: 20714
From: the other end of the sidewalk
Joined: 03-14-2004


Message 261 of 306 (376300)
01-11-2007 6:16 PM
Reply to: Message 260 by crashfrog
01-11-2007 5:29 PM


Re: Troll?
Is a "troll" anyone who disagrees with you?
No, a troll would be you, who's repeating the same old arguments over and over again
Actually "troll" is a fairly well defined internet term:
http://www.webopedia.com/TERM/t/troll.html
quote:
troll
(v.) (1) To deliberately post derogatory or inflammatory comments to a community forum, chat room, newsgroup and/or a blog in order to bait other users into responding.
Particularly to get a "flame" response when the victim loses it.

Join the effort to unravel AIDS/HIV, unfold Proteomes, fight Cancer,
compare Fiocruz Genome and fight Muscular Dystrophy with Team EvC! (click)


we are limited in our ability to understand
by our ability to understand
RebelAAmericanOZen[Deist
... to learn ... to think ... to live ... to laugh ...
to share.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 260 by crashfrog, posted 01-11-2007 5:29 PM crashfrog has not replied

RAZD
Member (Idle past 1427 days)
Posts: 20714
From: the other end of the sidewalk
Joined: 03-14-2004


Message 302 of 306 (376619)
01-12-2007 9:34 PM
Reply to: Message 301 by Taz
01-12-2007 8:56 PM


For the fourth time, every state that has a ban on gay marriage also has a ban on all forms of union that even remotely resemble marriage, and that includes your so-called civil union.
Think they might pass a law that removes all legal bias on marriage?
Or do they think marriage needs affirmative action?
Just some thoughts prior to closing time

Join the effort to unravel AIDS/HIV, unfold Proteomes, fight Cancer,
compare Fiocruz Genome and fight Muscular Dystrophy with Team EvC! (click)


we are limited in our ability to understand
by our ability to understand
RebelAAmericanOZen[Deist
... to learn ... to think ... to live ... to laugh ...
to share.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 301 by Taz, posted 01-12-2007 8:56 PM Taz has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 303 by Taz, posted 01-12-2007 9:38 PM RAZD has replied

RAZD
Member (Idle past 1427 days)
Posts: 20714
From: the other end of the sidewalk
Joined: 03-14-2004


Message 304 of 306 (376623)
01-12-2007 9:44 PM
Reply to: Message 303 by Taz
01-12-2007 9:38 PM


reverse psychology

This message is a reply to:
 Message 303 by Taz, posted 01-12-2007 9:38 PM Taz has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 305 by AdminPhat, posted 01-12-2007 9:48 PM RAZD has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024