Homosexuality, the natural choice? (Gay Animals are Common)

So, even with all those laws right there in front of you, you can't think of any problems that you can actually type out and discuss.In other words, your opinion is equivalent to the leprauchan threat. You know, even if civil unions happen, every single one of those laws will have to be slightly re-written anyway, and then put in place as an extra set of new laws. Which makes civil unions, in addition to being institutionalized segregation, an unnecessary extra level of government bureaucracy.Of course, we all know things go much smoother with extra government bureaucracy. So that's okay.

Right back at'cha, ma'am.

Pretty much, if you consider saying, "get this frikkin' noose off me" the same as hanging someone.How do you manage to type while masturbating like that? Do you have a special device that leaves your hands free?

Wasn't meant to be.

I doubt it. It'd be a bit of a waste of time.

Already covered in a thousand Loving v. Virginia post. Either you can't read, or you're trolling.I suppose it's also possible you're a monkey at a keyboard, hitting random keys, and pounding out post after post through sheer chance. But it seems a bit unlikely.Unless you're infinite monkeys. Are you infinite monkeys?

It was, unfortunately, a hypothetical that required me to first be hypothetically gay, then hypothetically turned straight, for us to reach a hypothetical non-point.As with the gene therapy nonsense, perhaps you could focus your statements a bit more on reality, than on your curiosity about how valid gay marriage would be in the distant future, or in a parallel universe. This crap was already covered, too. Gosh, it's almost like you are just trolling.

Tell you what... if you attempt to bait me by referring to me as a tall, American cartoonist, I will not consider it trollish behavior. Yeah... good times.

Gosh. When I called you a troll, I didn't realize that you had the intergrity to blindly repeat your opposition to gay marriage, without addressing any of the 18 pages of arguments against it.Again.Edited by Dan Carroll, : No reason given.

If you keep soilutioning yourself, you should probably calm down.The really obvious fact about civil unions, that a separate institution is inherently unequal, has been explained you so many times that my semi-retarded dog has started rolling his eyes every time you fail to get it.It's kind of cute, actually.

Jokes are a privilege, Hoot. First grow some funny. Gosh, we already went over that four days ago. But here you are, blindly repeating yourself as though nothing was said.Neat.

If by "passed brainstones", you mean "pointed out that the US Government already shot down this bullshit line of reasoning, a very long time ago," then yes. Yes I have.And yet you keep repeating it. Odd.Edited by Dan Carroll, : No reason given.Edited by Dan Carroll, : No reason given.

No. Civil unions are an excellent solution, if you are willing to ignore piddling little perceived stigmas like "segregation" and "institutionalized bigotry".Other than that, they're great. Hooray for that comfy seat in the back of the bus.

So now you're just living in a whacked out fantasy world.I didn't ask you to repeat yourself. I pointed that you were repeating yourself, in a manner I would describe as mindless. You keep living up to the hype.Of course, you know this; you're changing the subject so that a couple hours from now, you can just repeat, "Civil unions are the soilution! A-hyuk!"Edited by Dan Carroll, : No reason given.

Are they being denied those specific rights? No. They are, however, being denied marriage, which is a fundamental right guaranteed to all Americans. This is the moral and legal equivalent of separating them at water fountains, buses, and schools.This is why the same amendment that struck down school segregation also later struck down bans on interracial marriage. They're the same issue; they're both segregation. Without prejudice, we wouldn't have to dither about steps in the right direction. We'd just go ahead and treat homosexuals as equals.Making concessions to bigotry by putting something less than equality into place, instead of just enacting equal treatment, is not a good thing.