Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,787 Year: 4,044/9,624 Month: 915/974 Week: 242/286 Day: 3/46 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Feedback about reliability of dating
Wepwawet
Member (Idle past 6135 days)
Posts: 85
From: Texas
Joined: 04-05-2006


Message 45 of 77 (376891)
01-14-2007 8:18 AM
Reply to: Message 44 by elcano
01-14-2007 6:18 AM


Re: Dating of manuscripts
Are you trying to tell us that the Roman city of Pompeii was destroyed in the eruption of 1631 and not 79? Or are you confusing it with the modern Italian city of Pompei?
My Italian is extremely limited, but I can see references to the devastating eruption of 79 on the site. Vesuvius is an active volcano and has erupted many times; the last eruption was in 1944.

When science and the Bible differ, science has obviously misinterpreted its data.
- Henry Morris, Head of Institute for Creation Research

This message is a reply to:
 Message 44 by elcano, posted 01-14-2007 6:18 AM elcano has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 46 by elcano, posted 01-14-2007 8:50 AM Wepwawet has replied

  
Wepwawet
Member (Idle past 6135 days)
Posts: 85
From: Texas
Joined: 04-05-2006


Message 64 of 77 (377037)
01-14-2007 9:18 PM
Reply to: Message 46 by elcano
01-14-2007 8:50 AM


Jesuit Vulcanists
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
see PAGE NOT FOUND | Loyola University Chicago Libraries
In this work Neapolitan Jesuit G. B. Mascolo records his observations of the eruption of Mount Vesuvio in 1631. The illustrations record the appearance of the volcano and the surrounding area before and after the eruption.
On a map there is Pompeii and Herculaneum (1631 Year )
You didn't answer my direct question and this link doesn't answer it either. Mascolo sketched the area before and after the 1631 eruption but there's no evidence that there was a thriving anachronistic Roman city that was destroyed in 1631.
Other posters have mentioned writings contemporary with the 79 eruption. To top that off you can now go walk the streets of Pompeii yourself. I've never had the pleasure but it's something I want to do very badly. The evidence I've seen and held (including quite a few artifacts excavated at Pompeii) indicate that it was a thriving first century city when it was destroyed.
Perhaps you're making the mistake of believing that a volcano is only allowed to erupt once. Vesuvius has plenty of eruptions that appear in historical records. According to my search the 1631 eruption killed about 3,000. Significant but not as many as the 79 which probably killed more than 20,000.
The city of Pompeii was not rediscovered until after the 1631 eruption (Pompeii was rediscovered in 1748). Any reference to Pompeii that is contemporary with the 1631 eruption can only refer to the Italian city of Pompei that shares a name, but not location with the original Roman city.

When science and the Bible differ, science has obviously misinterpreted its data.
- Henry Morris, Head of Institute for Creation Research

This message is a reply to:
 Message 46 by elcano, posted 01-14-2007 8:50 AM elcano has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 65 by RAZD, posted 01-14-2007 10:32 PM Wepwawet has not replied
 Message 66 by RAZD, posted 01-15-2007 3:08 PM Wepwawet has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024