But taking Jesus as an example, if it can be shown that some spectacular falsifyable prophecy of his was fulfilled in our time, credibility to the unfalsifyable other miracles receives a measure of support.
Yet so far you have never been able to cite such an example of a fulfilled prophecy. In addition, even if you did provide such an example it does NOT add credibility to an unfalsifiable miracle. That assertion is simply wrong.
If you wish to rephrase that to say that "IN your mind it adds credibility" then I dounbt anyone would disagree.
By the same token, fulfilled prophecy defies conventional science. Again, for example likely scientific stats would show that it is matmatically impossible for a tribe of people to disperse to all regions of the globe and to return to their homeland intact and identifiable as the same tribe of people who dispersed nearly two milleniums later, the OT prophets first making the prophecies and Jesus repeating it a few years before the dispersion some 1900+ years ago.
Again, simply a nonsense statement. First, unless you actually show how any such calculations are done you are just making stuff up. Second, using the term "Tribe" has no meaning. Not ONE of the Tribes of Israel has been reconstituted and there was never any evidence of a Tribe called Israel.
Buz you gotta stop just making stuff up.
Must all science, by definition, always be evaluated as correctly performed or arrive at correct conclusions to come under the definition of doing science?
Yup. Within the limits of current knowledge and evidence at the time, it must. It must also always be held as tentative.
Aslan is not a
Tame Lion
™ Version 4.2
