Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,422 Year: 3,679/9,624 Month: 550/974 Week: 163/276 Day: 3/34 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Lying For Jesus Award
nator
Member (Idle past 2191 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 121 of 279 (381203)
01-30-2007 7:52 AM
Reply to: Message 103 by riVeRraT
01-29-2007 5:17 PM


Re: Who represents who?
what is preventing them from loudly and publicly denouning him?"
quote:
He who is without sin shold throw the first stone.
"All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing."
Edmund Burke
Irish orator, philosopher, & politician (1729 - 1797)
quote:
That and maybe money, and a television network.
Are you telling me that no religious leaders can write a press release? None of them can contact radio and television stations and newspapers to voice their opinion?
None of them?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 103 by riVeRraT, posted 01-29-2007 5:17 PM riVeRraT has not replied

  
nator
Member (Idle past 2191 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 122 of 279 (381204)
01-30-2007 7:56 AM
Reply to: Message 105 by anastasia
01-29-2007 6:01 PM


Re: Who represents who?
Why aren't those 50 Christian leaders standing up and refusing to allow Falwell to speak for them?
quote:
All I can say is that it must be nice to have no atheist denominations to take the blame and the responsibility when one of you goes awry.
If an atheist got on television and started spouting hate in the name of all atheists, you are damn right I would stand up and voice my opinion.
quote:
Oh, and no God to catch up to you when the humans fail.
I don't even know why the above is relevant to this conversation.
I guess, though, that you can't give any reason at all for why Christian leaders do not stand up and publicly reject Falwell and his ilk.
I guess you all must be OK with what each and every one of those con men promote.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 105 by anastasia, posted 01-29-2007 6:01 PM anastasia has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 131 by anastasia, posted 01-30-2007 6:54 PM nator has not replied

  
nator
Member (Idle past 2191 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 123 of 279 (381206)
01-30-2007 8:03 AM
Reply to: Message 118 by Buzsaw
01-29-2007 11:48 PM


Re: Who represents who?
The point is, buz, most mainstream Christians quite rightly think Falwell is a first class, power-hungry nutjob, yet they don't seem to be standing up to oppose him when he is the religious leader invited to appear on CNN to provide the "Christian" viewpoint.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 118 by Buzsaw, posted 01-29-2007 11:48 PM Buzsaw has not replied

  
riVeRraT
Member (Idle past 437 days)
Posts: 5788
From: NY USA
Joined: 05-09-2004


Message 124 of 279 (381229)
01-30-2007 9:54 AM
Reply to: Message 109 by ringo
01-29-2007 6:35 PM


Re: Who represents who?
When Jesus said that, He was talking about actually stoning somebody.
(Why is it that you can't see when something is literal? )
Picking and choosing what is literal now, are we?
I believe the story happened, but more importantly, it was written and published for thousands of years for us to learn a lesson from.
Jesus came to save, not to judge. I am not going to go to capitol hill and start a march against other people, when I myself cannot get it right. All I can do is love them, and try to come to an understanding with people who think like that.
Everyone keeps talking to me, like I do not do my part, but believe me, I am that guy in my church who ruins the party all the time. fortunately it happens almost next to never in my church, because people are educated. Many of the ideas that we talk about in this forum come up in leadership meetings in my church as we look for a way to be relavent in the 21st century. Including the one you presented about giving to other organizations without taking any credit at all. And it wasn't even me that thought of it.
He was not saying we have to be without sin to speak out against wrong-doing, He was just saying "Don't kill the wrongdoers."
Maybe He meant do not condemn.
It is clear that the Christian thing to do is to rebuke your Christian brothers when they do wrong, not turn away and ignore it.
I never said it was wrong to rebuke them, I do it all the time.
And don't forgive them until they repent.
That one, I do not know about. I usually forgive people instantly, but I may not trust them until the repent.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 109 by ringo, posted 01-29-2007 6:35 PM ringo has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 126 by ringo, posted 01-30-2007 11:37 AM riVeRraT has replied

  
riVeRraT
Member (Idle past 437 days)
Posts: 5788
From: NY USA
Joined: 05-09-2004


Message 125 of 279 (381231)
01-30-2007 10:01 AM
Reply to: Message 117 by Buzsaw
01-29-2007 11:36 PM


Re: Who represents who?
So then you agree with me.
In Acts 11:26 it says "The disciples were called Christians first at Antioch."
Like I said before, I prefer to call myself a disciple. It was others who gave them the name Christians.
Acts 26:28Then Agrippa said to Paul, "Do you think that in such a short time you can persuade me to be a Christian?"
29Paul replied, "Short time or long”I pray God that not only you but all who are listening to me today may become what I am, except for these chains."
What was Paul? He was a disciple.
Only 1 Peter 4:16 supports your statement.
But words change meaning over time. My other point is also not to call myself a Christian. If people want to call me that, that is fine, I only want to be called that if I earn it.
Clearly there is a problem when others are calling themselves Christian, and not acting like a Christian.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 117 by Buzsaw, posted 01-29-2007 11:36 PM Buzsaw has not replied

  
ringo
Member (Idle past 433 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


Message 126 of 279 (381248)
01-30-2007 11:37 AM
Reply to: Message 124 by riVeRraT
01-30-2007 9:54 AM


Re: Who represents who?
riVeRraT writes:
Picking and choosing what is literal now, are we?
Well, of course. An intelligent reading of any text involves deciding what is literal and what is not.
I never said it was wrong to rebuke them, I do it all the time.
Then you agree that Christians should speak out against Falwell, Robertson and all the other Gangsters for Christ. Good. Let's see you do more of that around here.
I usually forgive people instantly, but I may not trust them until the repent.
Allow me to repeat:
quote:
Luk 17:3 Take heed to yourselves: If thy brother trespass against thee, rebuke him; and if he repent, forgive him.
Did you notice the "if" this time?
You're not supposed to "forgive" Benny Hinn for conning little old ladies and then watch him keep doing it.

Help scientific research in your spare time. No cost. No obligation.
Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC

This message is a reply to:
 Message 124 by riVeRraT, posted 01-30-2007 9:54 AM riVeRraT has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 138 by riVeRraT, posted 01-31-2007 9:10 AM ringo has replied

  
AZPaul3
Member
Posts: 8529
From: Phoenix
Joined: 11-06-2006
Member Rating: 5.1


Message 127 of 279 (381258)
01-30-2007 12:17 PM
Reply to: Message 120 by nator
01-30-2007 7:47 AM


Re: Catholic Troll
Anybody who defends Ann Coulter as some kind of purveyor of actual "information" obviously hasn't a firm grasp upon reality.
Ahh, a nice classic coulterism.
She is wearing on you, nator.
Love the avatar, btw.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 120 by nator, posted 01-30-2007 7:47 AM nator has not replied

  
New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 128 of 279 (381277)
01-30-2007 1:44 PM
Reply to: Message 120 by nator
01-30-2007 7:47 AM


Trollinator
Anybody who defends Ann Coulter as some kind of purveyor of actual "information" obviously hasn't a firm grasp upon reality.
You're easy.

I troll you to point out how ridiculous some of your logical inductions are. And you post your logical inductions to point out how you think that others peoples posts are ridiculous. So, in a sense, I'm no more of a troll that you are.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 120 by nator, posted 01-30-2007 7:47 AM nator has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 135 by AdminSchraf, posted 01-30-2007 10:16 PM New Cat's Eye has not replied
 Message 136 by nator, posted 01-30-2007 10:36 PM New Cat's Eye has not replied
 Message 137 by AdminPhat, posted 01-31-2007 3:01 AM New Cat's Eye has replied

  
Fosdick 
Suspended Member (Idle past 5521 days)
Posts: 1793
From: Upper Slobovia
Joined: 12-11-2006


Message 129 of 279 (381288)
01-30-2007 2:10 PM


Coulter v. Fonda
I think a pay-per-view boxing match between Ann Coulter and Jane Fonda would be bring in a tidy sum. I'd pay to watch it.
”Hoot Mon

Replies to this message:
 Message 130 by arachnophilia, posted 01-30-2007 2:17 PM Fosdick has not replied

  
arachnophilia
Member (Idle past 1365 days)
Posts: 9069
From: god's waiting room
Joined: 05-21-2004


Message 130 of 279 (381290)
01-30-2007 2:17 PM
Reply to: Message 129 by Fosdick
01-30-2007 2:10 PM


Re: Coulter v. Fonda
i got 20 on fonda. she'd break coulter in two.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 129 by Fosdick, posted 01-30-2007 2:10 PM Fosdick has not replied

  
anastasia
Member (Idle past 5974 days)
Posts: 1857
From: Bucks County, PA
Joined: 11-05-2006


Message 131 of 279 (381367)
01-30-2007 6:54 PM
Reply to: Message 122 by nator
01-30-2007 7:56 AM


Re: Who represents who?
nator writes:
I guess, though, that you can't give any reason at all for why Christian leaders do not stand up and publicly reject Falwell and his ilk.
Ok, fine, you asked for it. Remember the Pater Noster? Thy kingdom come, Thy will be done on earth as it is in heaven?
Do you seriously think any good Catholic trusts in men, and their justice? Do you think we believe speaking out against men solves spiritual problems?
Edited by anastasia, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 122 by nator, posted 01-30-2007 7:56 AM nator has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 132 by ringo, posted 01-30-2007 6:59 PM anastasia has replied

  
ringo
Member (Idle past 433 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


Message 132 of 279 (381369)
01-30-2007 6:59 PM
Reply to: Message 131 by anastasia
01-30-2007 6:54 PM


anastasia writes:
Do you think we believe speaking out against men solves spiritual problems?
What part of "If thy brother trespass against thee, rebuke him" do you not understand?

Help scientific research in your spare time. No cost. No obligation.
Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC

This message is a reply to:
 Message 131 by anastasia, posted 01-30-2007 6:54 PM anastasia has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 133 by anastasia, posted 01-30-2007 7:34 PM ringo has replied

  
anastasia
Member (Idle past 5974 days)
Posts: 1857
From: Bucks County, PA
Joined: 11-05-2006


Message 133 of 279 (381378)
01-30-2007 7:34 PM
Reply to: Message 132 by ringo
01-30-2007 6:59 PM


Ringo writes:
What part of "If thy brother trespass against thee, rebuke him" do you not understand?
Oh, sorry, have you got Falwell's phone number. Let the rebuking begin!
Saint Michael the Archangel,
defend us in battle.
Be our protection against the wickedness and snares of the devil.
May God rebuke him, we humbly pray;
and do Thou, O Prince of the Heavenly Host -
by the Divine Power of God -
cast into hell, satan and all the evil spirits,
who roam throughout the world seeking the ruin of souls.
Amen.
Oh, wait, I have been connected straight to God.
Edited by anastasia, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 132 by ringo, posted 01-30-2007 6:59 PM ringo has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 134 by ringo, posted 01-30-2007 7:46 PM anastasia has not replied

  
ringo
Member (Idle past 433 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


Message 134 of 279 (381384)
01-30-2007 7:46 PM
Reply to: Message 133 by anastasia
01-30-2007 7:34 PM


anastasia writes:
Oh, sorry, have you got Falwell's phone number. Let the rebuking begin!
Falwell trespasses publicly, so the rebuke should be public too, not private by phone. You can start by rebuking him here and by rebuking what he stands for instead of defending Christians who turn a blind eye.

Help scientific research in your spare time. No cost. No obligation.
Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC

This message is a reply to:
 Message 133 by anastasia, posted 01-30-2007 7:34 PM anastasia has not replied

  
AdminSchraf
Inactive Member


Message 135 of 279 (381421)
01-30-2007 10:16 PM
Reply to: Message 128 by New Cat's Eye
01-30-2007 1:44 PM


content removed.
Edited by AdminSchraf, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 128 by New Cat's Eye, posted 01-30-2007 1:44 PM New Cat's Eye has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024