Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,787 Year: 4,044/9,624 Month: 915/974 Week: 242/286 Day: 3/46 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Lying For Jesus Award
riVeRraT
Member (Idle past 442 days)
Posts: 5788
From: NY USA
Joined: 05-09-2004


Message 181 of 279 (381853)
02-02-2007 9:49 AM
Reply to: Message 147 by Taz
02-01-2007 2:28 PM


Re: Who represents who?
Why is it that christians like you always say that you speak out and protest against religious conmen and yet I've never actually see any example? Or is this one of those silent majority thing again?
Because when I do, you just breeze over it, because it doesn't rub you the wrong way. People are generally only remembered for the bad things they do.
It's not that I'm saying all you christians are bad. What I'm saying is from my perspective as an outsider it seems like 99% of christianity agree with all the crap televangelists preach and the other 1% always proclaim that there is a "silent majority" out there.
Your absolutely right.
I am forwarding your whoel reply to my Pastor.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 147 by Taz, posted 02-01-2007 2:28 PM Taz has not replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 420 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 182 of 279 (381886)
02-02-2007 10:54 AM
Reply to: Message 179 by riVeRraT
02-02-2007 9:45 AM


Re: Who represents who?
So just ignore the musslim extremeists?
Fundamentalists of any stripe are a threat. I never said ignore the Muslim extremists but quite frankly, they are no where near as big a threat as the Christian Cult of Ignorance.
BTW, I don't think that cleaning house will ever happen. People will always manage to be bad, and claim they are Christian.
So we shouldn't make the effort? How pathetic!

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

This message is a reply to:
 Message 179 by riVeRraT, posted 02-02-2007 9:45 AM riVeRraT has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 186 by Fosdick, posted 02-02-2007 1:04 PM jar has replied
 Message 202 by Hyroglyphx, posted 02-02-2007 9:14 PM jar has replied
 Message 255 by riVeRraT, posted 02-04-2007 1:42 PM jar has replied

  
Percy
Member
Posts: 22492
From: New Hampshire
Joined: 12-23-2000
Member Rating: 4.9


Message 183 of 279 (381901)
02-02-2007 11:45 AM
Reply to: Message 175 by Buzsaw
02-01-2007 11:25 PM


Re: Falwell Lies For Jesus?
Buzsaw writes:
All I can say my friend is that I hope folks allow you more leeway than you are allowing this good man when it comes to charges of lying when imo it would be more Christian to simply put it that you are in disagreement with his positions or that he could be mistaken in good faith.
You chastise us for rendering judgement on Falwell, yet you give Falwell a free pass for his expressions of hate and intolerance, for example his connection of 9/11 with secularists, gays, etc.? Why do you wish to yield Falwell the right to sit in judgement of others and not hold him to the Biblical prescription to "judge not that ye be not judged." You're sanctioning the behavior of people who place themselves above the Bible simply because they claim to be speaking for the Lord.
It isn't just Falwell. You're already on record as defending Hovind for tax evasion. Do you also defend Oral Roberts, his most extravagant misbehavior occurring when he declared that God would "call him home" if he didn't raise $8 million dollars? Do you also defend Jimmy Swaggert and his hypocrisy in preaching morality from the pulpit while trolling for prostitutes from his limo. Do you also defend Jim Bakker for defrauding his parishioners by selling over 100% shares in his Christian vacation resort? Do you also defend the shameless "faith healing for money" of Leroy Jenkins and Benny Hinn? Do you also defend the "pray for wealth" scam of Robert Tilton?
I ask why fundamentalists give a free pass to misbehaving fundamentalists, and you respond with a plea for giving a free pass to fundamentalists. Buz, do you recognize the irony of offering rebuttals that are actually examples of the very behavior you're trying to rebut?
--Percy
Edited by Percy, : Grammar.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 175 by Buzsaw, posted 02-01-2007 11:25 PM Buzsaw has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 185 by anastasia, posted 02-02-2007 12:04 PM Percy has not replied
 Message 193 by Buzsaw, posted 02-02-2007 7:34 PM Percy has replied

  
anastasia
Member (Idle past 5979 days)
Posts: 1857
From: Bucks County, PA
Joined: 11-05-2006


Message 184 of 279 (381903)
02-02-2007 11:47 AM
Reply to: Message 171 by ringo
02-01-2007 10:43 PM


Re: Falwell Lies For Jesus?
Ringo writes:
I've seen you explain in other threads that "catholic" means "universal" - that the "Catholic Church" encompasses all Christians (whether they want to be encompassed or not ).
LOL, no. That just means that the Catholic church will show uniformity of doctrine in wherever it is established.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 171 by ringo, posted 02-01-2007 10:43 PM ringo has not replied

  
anastasia
Member (Idle past 5979 days)
Posts: 1857
From: Bucks County, PA
Joined: 11-05-2006


Message 185 of 279 (381908)
02-02-2007 12:04 PM
Reply to: Message 183 by Percy
02-02-2007 11:45 AM


Re: Falwell Lies For Jesus?
Percy writes:
You chastise us for rendering judgement on Falwell, yet you give Falwell a free pass for his expressions of hate and intolerance, for example his connection of 9/11 with secularists, gays, etc.?
It is a common belief in Christianity that God will chastise the earth with war, violence, and calamity, in response to the sins of men. Falwell forgets that sin is in the heart and in the intentions, and that not one of us can be blamed more than another, nor profess to see the 'sin' of another.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 183 by Percy, posted 02-02-2007 11:45 AM Percy has not replied

  
Fosdick 
Suspended Member (Idle past 5526 days)
Posts: 1793
From: Upper Slobovia
Joined: 12-11-2006


Message 186 of 279 (381920)
02-02-2007 1:04 PM
Reply to: Message 182 by jar
02-02-2007 10:54 AM


Whatsa "cult"?
Fundamentalists of any stripe are a threat. I never said ignore the Muslim extremists but quite frankly, they are no where near as big a threat as the Christian Cult of Ignorance.
What’s a “cult”? What is “bigotry”? What is “ignorance”? What is “politically correct”? Whose opinion counts the most in a capitalistic democracy? In America, I see at least seven master cults, each with its own centralizing forces, opinions, or otherwise “attractors”:
1. The Cults of Bicamerality”religions mostly, the attractors are the laws of God.
2. The Cults of Consciousness”science mostly, the attractors are the laws of nature.
3. The Cults of Wealth”money mostly, the attractors are the laws of economics.
4. The Cults of Power”politics mostly, the attractors are the laws of political persuasion.
5. The Cults of Pleasure”hedonism mostly, the attractors are the sensory stimulants (including heterosexual ones).
6. The Cults of Homosexuality”gays mostly, the attractors are same-sex contact and commiseration.
7. The Cult of Mediocrity”everybody else mostly, the attractors are the popular social norms of the times.
You can belong to more than one cult, several if you wish. You can call members of other cults “bigots” if you choose to. And you can probably think of additional cults: poverty, NASCAR, dog owners, medical professionals, Jewish Mah Jung aficionados . My favorite cult is the Cult of Literacy”readers and writers mostly, the attractor is making sense and nonsense out of all the other cults
What’s the point here? Jerry Falwell and his Jesus Cult is not the only cult to be worried about. Cults usually are more arbitrary and capricious than they are sound and reliable; even the Cult of Science has its own screwball history. Once we believed in humors, ethers, and phlogiston. Now, we (some of us) believe in global warming, cold fusion, and tiny black holes.
”Hoot Mon

This message is a reply to:
 Message 182 by jar, posted 02-02-2007 10:54 AM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 187 by anastasia, posted 02-02-2007 3:12 PM Fosdick has not replied
 Message 189 by jar, posted 02-02-2007 4:34 PM Fosdick has not replied

  
anastasia
Member (Idle past 5979 days)
Posts: 1857
From: Bucks County, PA
Joined: 11-05-2006


Message 187 of 279 (381925)
02-02-2007 3:12 PM
Reply to: Message 186 by Fosdick
02-02-2007 1:04 PM


Re: Whatsa "cult"?
Hoot Mon writes:
What’s a “cult”? What is “bigotry”? What is “ignorance”? What is “politically correct”?
Ignorance may be combatted with knowledge. Hatred sounds just as ugly on the lips of those who would be 'educated' as it does on those who would be Christian.
Oscar Wilde, in De Profundis, writes:
Like all poetical natures he (Jesus) loved ignorant people. He knew that in the soul of one who is ignorant there is always room for a great idea. But he could not stand stupid people, especially those who are made stupid by education: people who are full of opinions not one of which they even understand, a peculiarly modern type, summed up by Christ when he describes it as the type of one who has the key of knowledge, cannot use it himself, and does not allow other people to use it, though it may be made to open the gate of God's Kingdom. His chief war was against the Philistines. That is the war every child of light has to wage. Philistinism was the note of the age and community in which he lived. In their heavy inaccessibility to ideas, their dull respectability, their tedious orthodoxy, their worship of vulgar success, their entire preoccupation with the gross materialistic side of life, and their ridiculous estimate of themselves and their importance, the Jews of Jerusalem in Christ's day were the exact counterpart of the British Philistine of our own.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 186 by Fosdick, posted 02-02-2007 1:04 PM Fosdick has not replied

  
ringo
Member (Idle past 438 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


Message 188 of 279 (381931)
02-02-2007 3:31 PM
Reply to: Message 180 by riVeRraT
02-02-2007 9:46 AM


Re: Who represents who?
riVeRraT writes:
Well then that is precisely the reason people have a hard time protesting against anyone then, isn't it?
Who promised you an easy ride?

Help scientific research in your spare time. No cost. No obligation.
Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC

This message is a reply to:
 Message 180 by riVeRraT, posted 02-02-2007 9:46 AM riVeRraT has not replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 420 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 189 of 279 (381947)
02-02-2007 4:34 PM
Reply to: Message 186 by Fosdick
02-02-2007 1:04 PM


Re: Whatsa "cult"?
Whose opinion counts the most in a capitalistic democracy?
Who is speaking about opinions?
Jerry Falwell is Willfully Ignorant and a liar. Those are not opinions, they are facts.

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

This message is a reply to:
 Message 186 by Fosdick, posted 02-02-2007 1:04 PM Fosdick has not replied

  
Quetzal
Member (Idle past 5898 days)
Posts: 3228
Joined: 01-09-2002


Message 190 of 279 (381949)
02-02-2007 4:45 PM
Reply to: Message 150 by Kader
02-01-2007 4:04 PM


Re: Who represents who?
I truly believe that they would start silencing there brothers..the one that took a wrong turn somewhere.
I think you may have put your finger on something there. There was never a shadow of a doubt in my mind that once the fundamentalists get rid of all us outsiders, they'll turn on each other like ravening dogs. Unfortunately, the likes of me won't be around to witness it...

This message is a reply to:
 Message 150 by Kader, posted 02-01-2007 4:04 PM Kader has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 191 by jar, posted 02-02-2007 6:05 PM Quetzal has replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 420 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 191 of 279 (381971)
02-02-2007 6:05 PM
Reply to: Message 190 by Quetzal
02-02-2007 4:45 PM


Who the Fundies will come after first
I think you may have put your finger on something there. There was never a shadow of a doubt in my mind that once the fundamentalists get rid of all us outsiders, they'll turn on each other like ravening dogs. Unfortunately, the likes of me won't be around to witness it...
You might be right but I fear that their first target will be folk like myself.

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

This message is a reply to:
 Message 190 by Quetzal, posted 02-02-2007 4:45 PM Quetzal has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 192 by Quetzal, posted 02-02-2007 6:21 PM jar has not replied
 Message 194 by anglagard, posted 02-02-2007 7:49 PM jar has not replied
 Message 195 by Fosdick, posted 02-02-2007 7:55 PM jar has not replied

  
Quetzal
Member (Idle past 5898 days)
Posts: 3228
Joined: 01-09-2002


Message 192 of 279 (381979)
02-02-2007 6:21 PM
Reply to: Message 191 by jar
02-02-2007 6:05 PM


Re: Who the Fundies will come after first
I'll save you a spot next to me when we go up against the wall...

This message is a reply to:
 Message 191 by jar, posted 02-02-2007 6:05 PM jar has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 199 by Buzsaw, posted 02-02-2007 8:53 PM Quetzal has replied

  
Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 193 of 279 (381992)
02-02-2007 7:34 PM
Reply to: Message 183 by Percy
02-02-2007 11:45 AM


Re: Falwell Lies For Jesus?
Percy writes:
You chastise us for rendering judgement on Falwell, yet you give Falwell a free pass for his expressions of hate and intolerance, for example his connection of 9/11 with secularists, gays, etc.?
If you go back I asked that you apprise us as to what lies Falwell was telling. I'm still waiting for the specifics on that. I'm not aware of hatefulness from him. As for intolerance, he threatens no one that I know of for their views or lifestyles. He, like the rest of us, work to get legislation passed for whatever we may be advocating. He preaches the Biblical principles regarding sex et al. Is that bad for a Biblical preacher?
9/ll/secularists/gays? I'm not aware of that. What's up there?
As I said you still have failed to identify the specific lies. As to the rest, until you specify what hate and unwaranted intolerance, I reserve judgement.
Percy writes:
Why do you wish to yield Falwell the right to sit in judgement of others and not hold him to the Biblical prescription to "judge not that ye be not judged." You're sanctioning the behavior of people who place themselves above the Bible simply because they claim to be speaking for the Lord.
1. If you specify where he's placing himself above the Bible, I'd like to address that.
2. Teaching and preaching Biblical principles is what preachers are suppose to do. If you see that as judging where do yo draw the line between judging and admonishing/teaching?
Percy writes:
It isn't just Falwell. You're already on record as defending Hovind for tax evasion.
If you go back and read me, you'll see that I was reserving judgement until it is established that he was indeed breaking the law since many have gotten by for decades using loopholes etc. I remained neutral as to judgement until the verdict was out. It appears that he ran out of loopholes and deserves some punishment. I'm not sure about 10 years without parole, if that's what he got. That seems quite harsh.
Percy writes:
Do you also defend Oral Roberts, his most extravagant misbehavior occurring when he declared that God would "call him home" if he didn't raise $8 million dollars?
You likely either forgot or missed it. I've gone on record as veheminently condemning this outrageous and egregious conduct. I've never lent any support to this con artist.
Percy writes:
Do you also defend Jimmy Swaggert and his hypocrisy in preaching morality from the pulpit while trolling for prostitutes from his limo. Do you also defend Jim Bakker for defrauding his parishioners by selling over 100% shares in his Christian vacation resort?
Of course not. You sure do have a low estimate of the ole man, my friend. It's a bit disheartening to see that I've given you that low estimation of my moral standards. I would have assumed you would know the answers to such questions from positions I've taken at EvC on morality and such.
Percy writes:
Do you also defend the shameless "faith healing for money" of Leroy Jenkins and Benny Hinn? Do you also defend the "pray for wealth" scam of Robert Tilton?
God has healed me by anointing by local church elders as per James 5:14 but have always taken the position that the methodology of these kind of faith healers is not Biblical. No, I don't defend them. So far as asking money for legitimate air time, it depends on how it is used and whether the work is honoring to God and his word.
Percy writes:
I ask why fundamentalists give a free pass to misbehaving fundamentalists, and you respond with a plea for giving a free pass to fundamentalists. Buz, do you recognize the irony of offering rebuttals that are actually examples of the very behavior you're trying to rebut?
That's certainly not a lie, Percy but it's very false in that you paint me as allowing free pass across the board to fundies, including the bad guys. Now, you're turning on me in judgement. I certainly hope in the judgement, God will allow you more leeway than you're willing to allow Biblical fundies. You and your friends here act as though a few bad guys are representative of the millions of Biblical fundies including myself who love God and honor his word.

BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW ---- Jesus said, "When these things begin to come to pass, then look up, and lift up your heads, for your redemption draws near." Luke 21:28

This message is a reply to:
 Message 183 by Percy, posted 02-02-2007 11:45 AM Percy has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 220 by Percy, posted 02-03-2007 11:19 AM Buzsaw has replied

  
anglagard
Member (Idle past 863 days)
Posts: 2339
From: Socorro, New Mexico USA
Joined: 03-18-2006


Message 194 of 279 (381997)
02-02-2007 7:49 PM
Reply to: Message 191 by jar
02-02-2007 6:05 PM


Re: Who the Fundies will come after first
You might be right but I fear that their first target will be folk like myself.
This may not be a comforting thought, but if history is any guide, including the history of this forum, you are very likely to be correct in this observation.
What fundamentalists consider 'heretics' seem to always be considered a greater threat than any external religion. Look at all those witchburnings and the Catholic vs Protestant warfare that took place while the Ottomans besieged Vienna.
I guess people like myself who adhere to the numerically smaller 'outsider' beliefs will be second. Larger competing religions will be third, then Athiests, Catholics, other Protestants, then finally each other.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 191 by jar, posted 02-02-2007 6:05 PM jar has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 196 by Buzsaw, posted 02-02-2007 8:39 PM anglagard has replied

  
Fosdick 
Suspended Member (Idle past 5526 days)
Posts: 1793
From: Upper Slobovia
Joined: 12-11-2006


Message 195 of 279 (381999)
02-02-2007 7:55 PM
Reply to: Message 191 by jar
02-02-2007 6:05 PM


Re: Who the Fundies will come after first
Quetzal wrote:
I think you may have put your finger on something there. There was never a shadow of a doubt in my mind that once the fundamentalists get rid of all us outsiders, they'll turn on each other like ravening dogs. Unfortunately, the likes of me won't be around to witness it...
jar responded:
You might be right but I fear that their first target will be folk like myself.
Children, children, the boogy man doesn't live under your beds any more. You'd think all the Christian ignoramuses have AIDS or somethings, and all they got is one old dead Jesus. If it's the "ravening dogs" of Christian evangelism you fear most, I'd say your priorities are messed up. I fear that poverty and crime will bite our fat American ass much more severely than the evangelicals. And when I think about who is really out to get me on a daily basis, I think of today's teenagers on meth, driving around fast and loose in their zipmobiles, while talking on their cell phones and smoking cigarettes. Pimple farmers!
”Hoot Mon
Edited by Hoot Mon, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 191 by jar, posted 02-02-2007 6:05 PM jar has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 197 by Buzsaw, posted 02-02-2007 8:49 PM Fosdick has replied
 Message 218 by Quetzal, posted 02-03-2007 10:48 AM Fosdick has replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024