Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 63 (9162 total)
6 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 916,398 Year: 3,655/9,624 Month: 526/974 Week: 139/276 Day: 13/23 Hour: 1/0


EvC Forum ⇒ Science Forums ⇒ Geology and the Great Flood ⇒

The Flood

Thread ▼ Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   The Flood
anastasia
Member (Idle past 5974 days)
Posts: 1857
From: Bucks County, PA
Joined: 11-05-2006

Normal Thread Display
Message 33 of 188 (383906)
02-09-2007 2:21 PM 		Reply to: Message 1 by Hyroglyphx
02-08-2007 1:57 PM

nemesis writes:
​
The second question is geared towards biblicists. This study, conducted in 1993, has had virtually no coverage. And of that which is mentioned, it is routinely dumbed down in an apparent view of it being inconsequential. Do you find it disheartening that some people have divorced themselves from this discovery, and if so, do you attribute it to them denying it over its greater implications-- such as, the denial of the Bible's historicity?
​
I am being humorous, and I promise not to post any more in this thread where honest scientific points are being made, but IMO there is nothing to date in the way of science that will make the Bible more likely to be true in its account of the Great Flood. All we have are basins filling and oceans spilling, where in the Bible, it clearly RAINED.
This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Hyroglyphx, posted 02-08-2007 1:57 PM Hyroglyphx has replied
Replies to this message:
 Message 57 by Hyroglyphx, posted 02-11-2007 11:05 AM anastasia has not replied
  
Date format: mm-dd-yyyy
Timezone: ET (US)
  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024