Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
6 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,455 Year: 3,712/9,624 Month: 583/974 Week: 196/276 Day: 36/34 Hour: 2/14


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   How accurate is this email?
Hyroglyphx
Inactive Member


Message 1 of 93 (385627)
02-16-2007 1:22 PM


SEVENTEEN WAYS TO BE A GOOD LIBERAL
1. You have to be against capital punishment, but support abortion on demand.
2. You have to believe that businesses create oppression but governments create prosperity.
3. You have to believe that guns in the hands of law-abiding citizens are more of a threat than nuclear weapons technology in the hands of Iran , China and/or North Korea.
4. You have to believe that there was no art before federal funding.
5. You have to believe that global temperatures are less affected by cyclical changes in the earth's climate and more affected by soccer moms driving SUVs.
6. You have to believe that gender roles are artificial, but being homosexual is natural.
7. You have to believe that the AIDS virus is spread by a lack of federal funding.
8. You have to believe that the same teacher who can't teach 4th-graders how to read is somehow qualified to teach those same kids about sex.
9. You have to believe that hunters don't care about nature, but PETA activists do.
10. You have to believe that self-esteem is more important than actually doing something that might merit it.
11. You have to believe the NRA is bad because it supports certain parts of the Constitution, while the ACLU is good because it
supports gutting certain parts of the Constitution.
12. You have to believe that taxes are too low, but ATM fees are too high.
13. You have to believe that Margaret Sanger and Gloria Steinem are more important to American history than Thomas Jefferson, George Washington, or Abraham Lincoln.
14. You have to believe that standardized tests are racist, but racial quotas and set-asides are not.
15. You have to believe that the only reason socialism hasn't worked anywhere it's been tried is because the right people haven't been in charge.
16. You have to believe that homosexual parades displaying drag queens and transvestites should be constitutionally protected, and manger scenes at Christmas should be illegal.
17. You have to believe that this message is a part of a vast right-wing conspiracy.

"A man can no more diminish God's glory by refusing to worship Him than a lunatic can put out the sun by scribbling the word, 'darkness' on the walls of his cell." -C.S. Lewis

Replies to this message:
 Message 2 by Percy, posted 02-16-2007 1:34 PM Hyroglyphx has replied
 Message 3 by Omnivorous, posted 02-16-2007 1:38 PM Hyroglyphx has replied
 Message 5 by Dan Carroll, posted 02-16-2007 1:41 PM Hyroglyphx has replied
 Message 10 by PaulK, posted 02-16-2007 1:54 PM Hyroglyphx has not replied
 Message 11 by Lithodid-Man, posted 02-16-2007 4:56 PM Hyroglyphx has not replied
 Message 12 by Chiroptera, posted 02-16-2007 5:12 PM Hyroglyphx has not replied
 Message 14 by crashfrog, posted 02-16-2007 6:27 PM Hyroglyphx has not replied
 Message 20 by alacrity fitzhugh, posted 02-17-2007 1:09 AM Hyroglyphx has replied
 Message 21 by tudwell, posted 02-17-2007 1:29 AM Hyroglyphx has replied
 Message 23 by ringo, posted 02-17-2007 10:54 AM Hyroglyphx has not replied
 Message 25 by Rob, posted 02-17-2007 11:13 AM Hyroglyphx has not replied
 Message 32 by Dr Adequate, posted 02-19-2007 6:47 PM Hyroglyphx has not replied

Hyroglyphx
Inactive Member


Message 4 of 93 (385633)
02-16-2007 1:39 PM
Reply to: Message 2 by Percy
02-16-2007 1:34 PM


Email
Did you want to provide attribution for this, or is it just sheer coincidence that this is already on the web?
No, it isn't mine. That's why I entitled the thread, "How accurate is this email?"

"A man can no more diminish God's glory by refusing to worship Him than a lunatic can put out the sun by scribbling the word, 'darkness' on the walls of his cell." -C.S. Lewis

This message is a reply to:
 Message 2 by Percy, posted 02-16-2007 1:34 PM Percy has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 6 by NosyNed, posted 02-16-2007 1:45 PM Hyroglyphx has not replied

Hyroglyphx
Inactive Member


Message 7 of 93 (385636)
02-16-2007 1:47 PM
Reply to: Message 3 by Omnivorous
02-16-2007 1:38 PM


Humor
I think this e-mail accurately typifies the sources and qualities of your political beliefs.
Is that what you wanted to know?
Sorry, I know its inflammatory. It was just so funny.

"A man can no more diminish God's glory by refusing to worship Him than a lunatic can put out the sun by scribbling the word, 'darkness' on the walls of his cell." -C.S. Lewis

This message is a reply to:
 Message 3 by Omnivorous, posted 02-16-2007 1:38 PM Omnivorous has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 8 by NosyNed, posted 02-16-2007 1:49 PM Hyroglyphx has not replied
 Message 9 by Omnivorous, posted 02-16-2007 1:52 PM Hyroglyphx has not replied
 Message 13 by PaulK, posted 02-16-2007 5:25 PM Hyroglyphx has not replied

Hyroglyphx
Inactive Member


Message 15 of 93 (385763)
02-16-2007 11:57 PM
Reply to: Message 5 by Dan Carroll
02-16-2007 1:41 PM


quote:
You have to be against capital punishment, but support abortion on demand.
Generally speaking, sure. What's your point?
That its ironic.
quote:
You have to believe that businesses create oppression but governments create prosperity.
Not really, no.
Generally speaking that would seem to be the case.
you'll probably hear most liberals say how stupid it was for Bush to invade Iraq, thus prompting Iran and North Korea to restart their nuclear programs.
You think that Iran and North Korea have been trying to get hold of nuclear weaponry because of the invasion of Iraq? I'm not seeing the correlation. Can you connect the dots for me?
quote:
You have to believe that there was no art before federal funding.
No, just that more art is a good thing, so it should probably be funded.
By the Federal Government though?
You realize that cyclical changes in the earth's climate are gonna happen, and therefore it's stupid to send them all out of whack by pumping noxious gases into the air.
Anthropogenic global warming is real. Its caused in part by carbon dioxide and methane gases. We should all stop breathing and eating beans in order to save the environment.
quote:
You have to believe that gender roles are artificial, but being homosexual is natural.
Sure. What's your point?
I think the point is that one doesn't make sense without the other. If gender roles are artificial then wouldn't that extend to homosexuality as well?
quote:
You have to believe that the AIDS virus is spread by a lack of federal funding.
Nope. Just that blocking funding to the research of any disease hampers the ability to find a vaccine.
But there already is an exorbitant amount of funding. Every pharmaceutical company in the world has vested interests in finding a vaccine. That's beau coup bucks for them.
You believe that we should pump money into the schools so we can effectively teach children to read. While they're there, it's probably a good idea for them to learn about sex.
Call me old fashion, but I think schools should be going to an actual education. Its the job of parents to teach their kids about sex, not some fruitloop that I didn't give permission to.
It is crazy to assume that those who are crazy about the life of animals care more about nature than those who shoot them, I'll give you that.
I don't like sport hunters at all. I think its a pointless, machismo endeavor. However, I think PETA goes overboard. They love the muskrat more than they love their own children.
quote:
You have to believe that self-esteem is more important than actually doing something that might merit it.
Not really sure where that's even coming from, so no.
I think the writer is poking fun at the celebration of mediocrity.
although I think the NRA is a bunch of gun-obsessed weirdos, I do think that as long as the 2nd amendment is on the books, it should be followed.
I guess you have a point. The NRA might endorse a 50 caliber sniper rifle with depleted uranium rounds as a perfectly normal gun for home defense.
I, for one, would rather my money be used for schools, and roads, and all sorts of things that will benefit me, than be pumped into building a bank manager's summer home.
That's not how it works.
Are there any liberals who hate the founding fathers? (Especially Thomas Jefferson? What?)
No, its just a joke. The writer is probably wondering why Sanger and Steinem are more celebrated than people who have made actual contributions to society. Being uppity isn't exactly a coveted virtue.
quote:
You have to believe that standardized tests are racist, but racial quotas and set-asides are not.
Aw, I can almost see the "straight white christian men are the ones who really have it rough" argument forming. When are you gonna get around to telling us about the time someone cracked your skull open, by the way?
Excuse me? The time somebody cracked open my skull? I've never said anything like at all.
I would probably go ahead and disagree with any theory about socialism that doesn't get how socialism works.
..... okay.
As has been explained to you over and over (and over and over) again, liberals don't think manger scenes should be illegal.
Just everything else associated with Jesus then?

"A man can no more diminish God's glory by refusing to worship Him than a lunatic can put out the sun by scribbling the word, 'darkness' on the walls of his cell." -C.S. Lewis

This message is a reply to:
 Message 5 by Dan Carroll, posted 02-16-2007 1:41 PM Dan Carroll has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 16 by kuresu, posted 02-17-2007 12:16 AM Hyroglyphx has replied
 Message 17 by BMG, posted 02-17-2007 12:29 AM Hyroglyphx has replied
 Message 18 by ringo, posted 02-17-2007 12:31 AM Hyroglyphx has replied
 Message 19 by Jaderis, posted 02-17-2007 12:51 AM Hyroglyphx has replied
 Message 28 by Jon, posted 02-17-2007 12:50 PM Hyroglyphx has replied
 Message 30 by Dan Carroll, posted 02-17-2007 6:53 PM Hyroglyphx has not replied
 Message 34 by FliesOnly, posted 02-20-2007 8:02 AM Hyroglyphx has not replied

Hyroglyphx
Inactive Member


Message 29 of 93 (385831)
02-17-2007 12:57 PM
Reply to: Message 16 by kuresu
02-17-2007 12:16 AM


only if you consider the foetus to be living.
????
What else is a fetus? Inorganic matter? Of course they are "living." Do you think a fetus magically comes alive when he/she passes through the birth canal?
actually, neoliberals are all for globalization. not the liberals you mean, though.
There are many shades of liberalism that in some cases seem to be a dichotomy, such as the transition from Red to Green. Which liberals do you think I was referring to?
quote:
You think that Iran and North Korea have been trying to get hold of nuclear weaponry because of the invasion of Iraq? I'm not seeing the correlation. Can you connect the dots for me?
sure. what's the best time to steal from the cookie jar? when mom's busy scolding your brother and not able to either catch/punish you.
I didn't see that as being the reason listed by Dan. Not that matters because both nations have been caught stealing not just a few cookies, but the whole jar.
we're tied up in Iraq. why do you think we set a second carrier group to the gulf? because Iran definitely thinks we're busy in Iraq, and can't punish Iran. If we weren't in Iran, sending the second carrier group wouldn't be necessary.
Okay, well if that's what you mean, I agree with you. There is little doubt in my mind that Abamandndidinahidadajad (did I spell that correctly ) feels like the US military is stretched thin.
butter vs. bullets. I prefer butter. besides, what agency has the reach (and money) to aid art like the feds?
The function of the government is clearly defined in the Constitution. Art isn't anywhere in that. I love art as much as the next guy, but that is a personal endeavor, not a government subsidized program. To me that's like the government funding the next Ozzy tour because music is an art form. It seems wholly inappropriate.
gender roles are the "male bread winner" and the "female homemaker". we put them into place. it's not exactly natural--go back in history, way back when we lived in small groups, and there was a more even and egalitarian split in duties. hell, you can still see that with some Nat. Am. tribes.
What are talking about? Wasn't this characterization exacerbated by the evolutionary point of view of hunter-gatherers? History definitely tells us of strong gender roles throughout many different cultures that never came in to contact with one another. Nature doled out those roles, but some people want to pretend that they are the concoction of of organized religion.
homosexuality is just as natural as heterosexuality. most likely. I haven't heard if they determined whether or not our DNA is invovled. however, our DNA is definitely not involved in making women homemakers and men breadwinners.
There is no determinant cause for homosexuality. They've been looking in to that for some time, which tells me that there are probably numerous factors, such as a conglomerate of psychology and physiology. Mostly psychological I would say. As far as gender roles are concerned, this push to androgenize the lot of us seems to make no sense. If we are supposed to consolidate the sexes where the sexes are virtually identical, then that would nullify homo and heterosexuality. If males are attracted to other men, that's because they desire male attributes sexually, right? If straight men like women its because they desire female attributes sexually, right? If we turn in to this androgenous lump, would there even be sexuality? If so, what would it look like?
i'd argue, though, that sex ed is just as real, and important education as the rest. fun fact (and funny)--the one school system in colorado that teaches abstinence only sex ed is the same school system with the highest rate of teen pregnancy in this state.
I don't think schools should teach either. I think schools should be worried about teaching mathematics, science, history, language, etc. Things like drivers ed and sex ed should be something that parents should be teaching their kids. Schools should be focused on more specialized things.
a time and place for everything. you know, the ACLU has defended the rights of christians to display manger scenes (and to not play basketball on sunday). I don't care if you display a manger scene, esp. if it's on your property. if not on your property, though, like, say, public property, could you at least include all the other relavent religions?
If that much time is invested on a plastic or ceramic baby Jesus, think of how much more worthwhile their lives could be invested in actual things of interest. If that is taboo then how do you feel about firehouses, police stations, or other forms of local governments that take it upon themselves to support presidential elections? I have seen numerous government institutions that openly supported John Kerry in the 2004 elections. Is it more appropriate for a government entity to openly support a specific candidate than it is to traditionally display a manger on a holiday DEDICATED to Christ???? The holiday is a religious one.

"A man can no more diminish God's glory by refusing to worship Him than a lunatic can put out the sun by scribbling the word, 'darkness' on the walls of his cell." -C.S. Lewis

This message is a reply to:
 Message 16 by kuresu, posted 02-17-2007 12:16 AM kuresu has not replied

Hyroglyphx
Inactive Member


Message 36 of 93 (386212)
02-20-2007 11:31 AM
Reply to: Message 17 by BMG
02-17-2007 12:29 AM


quote:
You think that Iran and North Korea have been trying to get hold of nuclear weaponry because of the invasion of Iraq? I'm not seeing the correlation. Can you connect the dots for me?
Iraq did not have nuclear weapons, and the U.S invaded. If Iraq had had nuclear weapons the U.S would very likely think twice about invading. If Iran and North Korea have nuclear weapons...
You think that Iran and N. Korea suddenly decided to expand their armament to include nuclear weapons because of the Iraq war..? That is pure fantasy. Making nuclear reactors, finding and synthesizing the necessary materials, arming the warheads, etc, is a long and arduous process. That means these programs have been going on for years and have no connection to the Iraq war. In fact, all nations were at relative peace with both these nations until they started their nuclear programs. This is a UN issue, not solely a US concern. Most nations have taken issue with these two countries because both have broken treaties.
quote:
Anthropogenic global warming is real. Its caused in part by carbon dioxide and methane gases. We should all stop breathing and eating beans in order to save the environment.
You probably know as well as I do that this is a straw-argument.
........ That was obviously a parody..... But if you want to actually stop breathing to mitigate global warming, don't let me stop you.
quote:
Just everything else associated with Jesus then?
Another straw argument. I don't believe liberals are against "everything associated with Jesus", but everything associated with Jesus on public property.
Hyperbole is for effect. It doesn't literally include everyone. Just those that take on asinine arguments, like, "Baby Jesus hurts my feelings."

"A man can no more diminish God's glory by refusing to worship Him than a lunatic can put out the sun by scribbling the word, 'darkness' on the walls of his cell." -C.S. Lewis

This message is a reply to:
 Message 17 by BMG, posted 02-17-2007 12:29 AM BMG has not replied

Hyroglyphx
Inactive Member


Message 37 of 93 (386213)
02-20-2007 11:35 AM
Reply to: Message 18 by ringo
02-17-2007 12:31 AM


What does homosexuality have to do with gender roles? Males are still males and females are still females.
The real question is why gender roles are something to look down on in straights, but something applauded in homosexuals. There seems to be some disparity. Why is that?

"A man can no more diminish God's glory by refusing to worship Him than a lunatic can put out the sun by scribbling the word, 'darkness' on the walls of his cell." -C.S. Lewis

This message is a reply to:
 Message 18 by ringo, posted 02-17-2007 12:31 AM ringo has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 40 by ringo, posted 02-20-2007 12:18 PM Hyroglyphx has not replied
 Message 77 by Jaderis, posted 02-21-2007 1:20 AM Hyroglyphx has not replied

Hyroglyphx
Inactive Member


Message 38 of 93 (386214)
02-20-2007 11:46 AM
Reply to: Message 19 by Jaderis
02-17-2007 12:51 AM


Pharmaceutical industry
quote:
Every pharmaceutical company in the world has vested interests in finding a vaccine. That's beau coup bucks for them.
I am not advocating any kind of conspiracy theory here, just posing a question.
Why would any pharmaceutical company interested solely in "beau coup" bucks (not saying they necessarily are...just following the line of thought) be interested in creating a vaccine or a cure which is a one time investment by individuals and would have to be priced relatively low over creating expensive medicines (cocktails of medicines, even) which have to be taken EVERY DAY by those afflicted.
Disease maintenance seems like it's more of a financial windfall than a vaccine or cure would be.
Good point. But even if they did come up with a vaccine that would wipe out the disease, the inoculation process would still generate a huge revenue. Plus, the company who invented the treatment would be in good standing with the public as great philanthropists. They would be looked to for the next crisis or crises.
But I've always wondered how much the pharmaceutical companies really want a complete cure. As you've shared it would be much more lucrative for them to come up with drugs that force the affected population to take them on a daily basis. Lets face it, they need sick people. I'm not suggesting that there is any kind of conspiracy. But I have wondered just how much they actually care about healing people from their ailments completely.

"A man can no more diminish God's glory by refusing to worship Him than a lunatic can put out the sun by scribbling the word, 'darkness' on the walls of his cell." -C.S. Lewis

This message is a reply to:
 Message 19 by Jaderis, posted 02-17-2007 12:51 AM Jaderis has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 39 by crashfrog, posted 02-20-2007 12:13 PM Hyroglyphx has not replied

Hyroglyphx
Inactive Member


Message 41 of 93 (386221)
02-20-2007 12:39 PM
Reply to: Message 20 by alacrity fitzhugh
02-17-2007 1:09 AM


Your message
quote:
1. You have to be against capital punishment, but support abortion on demand.
Support both.
Look, I didn't write this piece so if you have any bones of contention, take it up with the writer. This is obviously supposed to be a joke. Its poking fun at how many people of a liberal persuasion unyieldingly support abortion for any and all reasons. Likewise, those same people seem to be against the death penalty which is reserved for homicidal offenders. The irony is that they condemn the innocent but free the guilty. Make sense?
quote:
You have to believe that guns in the hands of law-abiding citizens are more of a threat than nuclear weapons technology in the hands of Iran China and/or North Korea.
Own guns, in fact most of my family does.
Perhaps you do. But the fact remains that many leftist luminaries do not in any way support the Second Amendment.
The only ones who fall for gender roles are males who are worried about being emasculated.
No one is worried about the fall of gender roles because they can't stop nature. Gender roles have to do with natural predilections, whereas people avowed against them have to inevitably try and subvert nature and go right to nurture.
And conservatives feel that that same teacher who cannot teach 4th graders properly should try teaching religion.
Uhhh...... What?
You have to believe the ACLU is bad because it supports certain parts of the Constitution, while believing the NRA is good because it
supports allowing automatic weapons.
Converting a weapon to an automatic is remarkably easy. As long as they have a weapon that can convert I think they'll be happy.

"A man can no more diminish God's glory by refusing to worship Him than a lunatic can put out the sun by scribbling the word, 'darkness' on the walls of his cell." -C.S. Lewis

This message is a reply to:
 Message 20 by alacrity fitzhugh, posted 02-17-2007 1:09 AM alacrity fitzhugh has not replied

Hyroglyphx
Inactive Member


Message 44 of 93 (386226)
02-20-2007 12:54 PM
Reply to: Message 21 by tudwell
02-17-2007 1:29 AM


Answering the critics
quote:
You have to be against capital punishment, but support abortion on demand.
Two completely different issues. But as others have said previously, "So?"
I don't support either abortion or the death penalty, but the irony I was speaking of is that its the killing of an innocent life, but the sparing of a guilty one who has taken other innocent lives. That's ironic.
quote:
You have to believe that businesses create oppression but governments create prosperity.
I believe both can be, and often are, a source of oppression.
As with anything I guess.
I don't know about 4th graders, but I certainly think middle schoolers should have sex ed. Sex is a subject, just like math or history, that they need to learn, and who better to teach them than a trained professional?
Trained in what? Sex? Since when is sex an academic endeavor? If sex education was merely about physiology, there would be some science behind it. And in that way I see it as completely applicable. But sex education is more about telling kids to wear condoms and less to do with any actual academic standard. I don't think its the school's place to teach kids about things their parents should be doing.
Interesting to note, the site Percy linked to in Message 2 doesn't contain the word "gutting".
I'm simply relaying the email as it was sent to me. But I like Percy's link better because it pokes fun at both sides.
I don't think standardized tests are racist.
But a lot of people do. Which is pretty silly considering the root of 49 has nothing to do with race.
I do, however, think racial quotas are racist.
Agreed.
I don't think socialism will ever work.
Unless we heal ourselves on an individual level it just won't happen. The idealization of socialism and communism is great. I don't think anyone disagrees with the basic premise. Unfortunately, the ideology writes checks that it can't cash.

"A man can no more diminish God's glory by refusing to worship Him than a lunatic can put out the sun by scribbling the word, 'darkness' on the walls of his cell." -C.S. Lewis

This message is a reply to:
 Message 21 by tudwell, posted 02-17-2007 1:29 AM tudwell has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 46 by crashfrog, posted 02-20-2007 1:15 PM Hyroglyphx has replied

Hyroglyphx
Inactive Member


Message 47 of 93 (386233)
02-20-2007 1:15 PM
Reply to: Message 28 by Jon
02-17-2007 12:50 PM


quote:
You think that Iran and North Korea have been trying to get hold of nuclear weaponry because of the invasion of Iraq? I'm not seeing the correlation. Can you connect the dots for me?
If you saw a crazed psycho running down the street stabbing everyone he met, wouldn't you remove your handgun from your purse and ready yourself for the fight? I mean, it's not like you can just pick up your country and run inside.
What did this have anything to do with what I posted?
quote:
By the Federal Government though?
I guess we could always ask Britain to fund it for us.
Or here's an idea. How about people fund it themselves like every one else in the world has to do? The sole function of the government is to protect its citizens. Art doesn't factor in to that.
quote:
Call me old fashion, but I think schools should be going to an actual education. Its the job of parents to teach their kids about sex, not some fruitloop that I didn't give permission to.
Then let the parents teach, and when the kids get to school, they will be a good week ahead of the rest of the students whose parents were too busy working two jobs just so they could pay for the food and rent which aren't completely covered by the low government funding for such things that help people with low incomes and requires that they still slave like mine monkeys.
Strawman. Just because some people spend less time with their kids than they like doesn't mean they can't take five minutes out of their day to learn about the birds and the bees. But this is besides the point. Schools are to foster academic learning, not learn about social ideas. If they are going to teach about social mores, then they could also teach how to have effective relationships, not how to place a piece of plastic on your penis. America is already woefully behind academically as it is. I think we need all of the alloted time going to learning.

"A man can no more diminish God's glory by refusing to worship Him than a lunatic can put out the sun by scribbling the word, 'darkness' on the walls of his cell." -C.S. Lewis

This message is a reply to:
 Message 28 by Jon, posted 02-17-2007 12:50 PM Jon has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 48 by crashfrog, posted 02-20-2007 1:18 PM Hyroglyphx has not replied

Hyroglyphx
Inactive Member


Message 59 of 93 (386275)
02-20-2007 5:09 PM
Reply to: Message 46 by crashfrog
02-20-2007 1:15 PM


Re: Answering the critics
Another way to look at it is preserving the lives of sentient humans, and not allowing those lives to be irrevocably altered by that which has no sentience. That's consistent.
We'll be sure to pull the plug on you in the event you lose consciousness. That aside, you do realize that even a fetus is sentient, (as if that were an argument for the cause). They are completely aware even if they don't yet possess the intellectual capacity to know where they are. But if you still want to assert this, when exactly does "sentience" develop in humans? Magically at birth?
Since condoms go on the penis, how is that not about physiology?
Then so is putting your shoes on by the same premise.
Since you seem to agree that standardized tests are in fact "racist," can you explain to all of us what it is that makes it racist? Because I'm mystified at how such an argument ever formulated in the first place.
But it's not. And so many of the supposedly-universal situations and examples are universal only to white people - which is what makes them racist.
Did you know that, even in the 70's, IQ tests - supposedly designed to measure intelligence absent any culturally-confounding factors - used examples of bowling scoring to test intelligence? Absent any explanation of the rules of bowling, of course. Now, I'm a white guy from Minnesota, and even I don't know how to score bowling. Because I hate bowling. Can you imagine growing up in a community where nobody ever bowled, and then seeing that question on a test? How many points did you just lose from your putative "intelligence" because you weren't a white person from the suburbs?
This sounds like a legitimate grievance so long as they did not, in fact, explain the scoring system used in the game of bowling. This is an interesting topic and I'd like to go more in to detail on it. I'm gonna write up a thread on IQ when I'm done with this post.
I think socialism works pretty well when all participants know each other pretty well. For instance, families are nearly universally socialist. Churches, too. Socialism is, in fact, one of the most common "emergent" economies at small scales. So to say it doesn't work is to ignore the myriad examples of socialism working just fine in a number of situations. You just don't think of them as "socialist", usually, but that's exactly what they are.
Love should be socialist, not an economy. Anyway, maybe I'll expound on that later, but I want to delve in to the IQ thread right now.

"A man can no more diminish God's glory by refusing to worship Him than a lunatic can put out the sun by scribbling the word, 'darkness' on the walls of his cell." -C.S. Lewis

This message is a reply to:
 Message 46 by crashfrog, posted 02-20-2007 1:15 PM crashfrog has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 62 by crashfrog, posted 02-20-2007 5:58 PM Hyroglyphx has replied

Hyroglyphx
Inactive Member


Message 65 of 93 (386297)
02-20-2007 7:03 PM
Reply to: Message 62 by crashfrog
02-20-2007 5:58 PM


Re: Answering the critics
If I'm ever in the same state Terri Schaivo was? Please do. I've made such wishes known to my wife and family.
If you want a DNR order, you have to annotate that specifically in a living will. If it ain't on paper, it never happened. That's just the way it goes. If you haven't drafted one yet, I suggest you do that, otherwise, in the event that you find yourself in a persistent vegetative state, their testimony alone may not be enough to pull the plug.
quote:
They are completely aware even if they don't yet possess the intellectual capacity to know where they are.
Fallacy of the looming caveat, if you'll pardon the expression. That's like saying "I don't have any debts, except my car payments, my mortgage, three credit cards, and I'm into Vinnie the Shark to the tune of 50 grand. Other than that, though, I'm living debt-free!"
Crash, the point that you are glibly overlooking is that infants do not have the intellectual capacity to understand their own life either. Therefore, you saying that they aren't sentient is specious at best. Aside from which, sentience is basically the lowest rung of consciousness. Fetus' can feel pain, have self-preservation mechanisms, and therefore, are sentient. They simply have not the capacity to understand themselves. But then again, that's what life is. Every day, my son and daughter learn more about themselves and become more aware of themselves in relation to their immediate environment. We could even extend that to adults.
It's the lack of intellectual capacity that renders them non-sentient. I mean, at some states of development we're talking about an organism that has no brain.
But you would have to then include infants and even toddlers in that equation. Surely you aren't advocating that they can be aborted in this stage in life, are you?
No, not magically at birth. It's a slow process that's commensurate with the absorption of language (which is, in my opinion, why children raised without language never develop above animal-like behavior.)
That's silly. So a mute or deaf person is not sentient because they can't absorb language the same way we can? At the nanosecond of conception we are beginning our life as new beings and slowly absorbing everything. I assume you've heard of the studies where babies of almost all mammals can identify their mothers voice or call. How? Because they've been listening to it during their gestation. They may not have an intellectual understanding of it, but its a clear mark of sentience, isn't it?
quote:
Then so is putting your shoes on by the same premise.
Um... ok? Can I assume from this remark that your next objection will be to the idea of schools teaching children how to tie their shoes?
No, I'm just illustrating that teaching pubescent boys how to put a condom on does not constitute a physiology lesson.
What's next with you, NJ? You think teaching children their colors and shapes violates the First Amendment? It's always a pleasure to see what outlandish, idiosyncratic legal theory you'll gift us with, next.
Outlandish? Its real simple Crash. There is no major or minor academic endeavor that would solely be geared towards teaching people how to practice safe sex. Rather, there are fields of study that seek to consolidate it in to their curriculum. School is not the appropriate place to be teaching sex ed. Parents should be teaching their kids about it. Now, again, if they were simply teaching the science of sex, I have no problem, whatsoever, with that. That's applicable. There is some academic reasons behind it. But scant focus is applied to this aspect. Really its just a soapbox for some blowhard to blather on about clandestine sexual trysts and to condone kids having sex. And they look dumbfounded as to why kids are still pregnant. That's because your education is inept. Kids and adults are inundated with sexual imagery morning, noon, and night. You want to take away gender roles? Turn on a major media outlet, virtually any cable station, and see what kind of "roles" are being portrayed. That's what shapes their identities. If you really want to gender norming to be the wave of the future, then look no further VH1, MTV, and BET which basically teach kids how they should act.
Heh... And they call Christians sheep, as they bleat the night away.
quote:
Since you seem to agree that standardized tests are in fact "racist," can you explain to all of us what it is that makes it racist?
I did explain. What are you still confused about?
You gave one example, bowling, which has nothing to do with race. Unless you think that some races are some how predisposed to liking bowling, whereas others aren't, I don't see a connection.
Let's say that they did explain the system, and then asked you to score a picture of some pins.
Since bowling is a sport more likely to have been played by whites than by other ethnicities, isn't that question still biased in favor of whites?
Would it be racist if you took an IQ test that talked about a game played in some area of the world that we knew little about? Or would you say that its just a bad question because it requires the people to understand the rules of the game?
The reason I never bowl is because I don't know how to score it. Even with the instructions written right out there, it doesn't make any sense to me.
I don't really like or dislike bowling. I'm kind of indifferent to it. But anyway, the scoring system is pretty easy. You just count up the number of pins knocked down to tally your score.
Do you remember when we talked about privilege? And one of those privileges was the privilege of having your culture considered "normal"? Like there's black culture, and asian culture, and then... where's white culture? It's all those things that don't seem like they're part of a culture to you - because you're a white person in white culture.
Right, but that's about culture, not about race. Case in point: If an African was asked to take an IQ test and one of the questions was about basketball, it would be culturally unfair to assess his intelligence based on a game he didn't understand. And yet, an African American might know every aspect of the game because he has a cultural advantage. Both are from the same race, but they come from different cultures. That's why I agree that using bowling was a bad idea, for cultural reasons or a lack of exposure to the rules of the game, but not because of race.
Love should be socialist. I like the way you put that.
Thanks

"A man can no more diminish God's glory by refusing to worship Him than a lunatic can put out the sun by scribbling the word, 'darkness' on the walls of his cell." -C.S. Lewis

This message is a reply to:
 Message 62 by crashfrog, posted 02-20-2007 5:58 PM crashfrog has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 70 by docpotato, posted 02-20-2007 8:17 PM Hyroglyphx has not replied
 Message 73 by crashfrog, posted 02-20-2007 11:04 PM Hyroglyphx has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024