Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,423 Year: 3,680/9,624 Month: 551/974 Week: 164/276 Day: 4/34 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Statistics 101
jar
Member (Idle past 415 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 2 of 199 (386465)
02-21-2007 10:42 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by nator
02-21-2007 10:31 PM


If you win, your odds are 1.

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by nator, posted 02-21-2007 10:31 PM nator has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 3 by nator, posted 02-21-2007 11:26 PM jar has replied
 Message 12 by crashfrog, posted 02-22-2007 10:16 AM jar has not replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 415 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 4 of 199 (386473)
02-21-2007 11:36 PM
Reply to: Message 3 by nator
02-21-2007 11:26 PM


Really?
The odds of winning the lotto can be a million to one, but if I win it on my first try, then those weren't my odds were they?
From what you quoted it sure looks like after the fact.
Which simply points out the idiocy of trying to apply statistics and science to miracles. All those who suggest such methods are simply being silly.
Miracles by definition are the result of an intentional act and are not, again by definition, repeatable. They are not subject to statistical analysis and any such efforts are simply a waste of time and a sure sign that the person suggesting such tests is pretty clueless about miracles.
If by some miracle someone wins the lotto on their first try, it matters not what the odds were.

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

This message is a reply to:
 Message 3 by nator, posted 02-21-2007 11:26 PM nator has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 7 by Modulous, posted 02-22-2007 2:20 AM jar has not replied
 Message 9 by riVeRraT, posted 02-22-2007 9:29 AM jar has replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 415 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 11 of 199 (386527)
02-22-2007 9:54 AM
Reply to: Message 9 by riVeRraT
02-22-2007 9:29 AM


Re: Well put jar
How can you explain the course of events that led that person to pick that number on the same day that the winning number came out?
There is your objective result, or you data, so now tell us nator, how did that person win? Keep in mind, that luck is not a scientific term.
When we are dealing strictly with the Lottery though, I agree with Schraf. There the answer is simply luck. Frankly, IMHO your position is even sillier than her's.

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

This message is a reply to:
 Message 9 by riVeRraT, posted 02-22-2007 9:29 AM riVeRraT has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 54 by riVeRraT, posted 02-22-2007 8:28 PM jar has replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 415 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 17 of 199 (386546)
02-22-2007 11:21 AM
Reply to: Message 16 by Modulous
02-22-2007 10:53 AM


The IRS will most certainly agree with you.

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

This message is a reply to:
 Message 16 by Modulous, posted 02-22-2007 10:53 AM Modulous has not replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 415 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 56 of 199 (386673)
02-22-2007 8:41 PM
Reply to: Message 54 by riVeRraT
02-22-2007 8:28 PM


Not just OT but really silly, absurd even.
BTW, siding with her, won't win her to God.
Now that is about as silly as anything anyone has ever posted.
Why would ANYONE ever want to "win someone to God?"
As for the rest, sure luck exists. It's not controllable or repeatable or subject to testing either.

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

This message is a reply to:
 Message 54 by riVeRraT, posted 02-22-2007 8:28 PM riVeRraT has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 60 by riVeRraT, posted 02-22-2007 9:04 PM jar has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024