Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 63 (9162 total)
1 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 916,332 Year: 3,589/9,624 Month: 460/974 Week: 73/276 Day: 1/23 Hour: 1/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Creationist Reasoning for Rubisco's Flaw
mjfloresta
Member (Idle past 6011 days)
Posts: 277
From: N.Y.
Joined: 06-08-2006


Message 31 of 33 (363889)
11-15-2006 9:54 AM
Reply to: Message 30 by joeferrari15
11-14-2006 11:33 PM


Re: Rubisco's "Flaw" = good and necessary "design".
Here's the link - Just a moment...

This message is a reply to:
 Message 30 by joeferrari15, posted 11-14-2006 11:33 PM joeferrari15 has not replied

  
sico
Junior Member (Idle past 6260 days)
Posts: 2
Joined: 02-24-2007


Message 32 of 33 (386909)
02-24-2007 5:33 PM
Reply to: Message 7 by AnswersInGenitals
11-04-2006 5:21 PM


Re: Creation science has the only supportable answer.
Im a genetics degree student and thought I would correct or answer a statement/ question made by yourself.You said:
From these statements, we must conclude that the concentration of oxygen in the atmosphere is significantly higher in hot, dry climes than in cool, wet ones. Do you have some references to back up this inference?
The reason why plants specifically xerophytes are thought to have evolved C4 and CAM pathway to overcome Rubisco's afinity for Oxygen is not due to higher oxygen levels in the atmosphere of hot arid environments, but due to the fact that plants in these environments close their stomata to reduce water loss(by transpiration)and so also reduce the amounts of CO2 that they can take in, effectively starving the Calvin cycle of CO2.As the levels of CO2 begin to decrease due lack of intake and use in Calvin cycle, the ratio of O2 to CO2 inside the leaf increases, increasing the chances that rubisco will bind O2 rather than CO2.
This however is rerely a problem for plants in more temperate climates so there has been little or no selection pressures to evelove this kind of pathway in these environments.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 7 by AnswersInGenitals, posted 11-04-2006 5:21 PM AnswersInGenitals has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 33 by sico, posted 02-24-2007 5:51 PM sico has not replied

  
sico
Junior Member (Idle past 6260 days)
Posts: 2
Joined: 02-24-2007


Message 33 of 33 (386910)
02-24-2007 5:51 PM
Reply to: Message 32 by sico
02-24-2007 5:33 PM


Re: Creation science has the only supportable answer.
sorry didnt read the whole of the page

This message is a reply to:
 Message 32 by sico, posted 02-24-2007 5:33 PM sico has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024