Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 63 (9162 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 916,385 Year: 3,642/9,624 Month: 513/974 Week: 126/276 Day: 23/31 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Limits on Abortion
Dan Carroll
Inactive Member


Message 46 of 230 (387428)
02-28-2007 1:47 PM
Reply to: Message 9 by Hyroglyphx
02-24-2007 9:54 PM


What I mean is that if there is a high probability of death for both parties, you must opt to save the mother because the child will die regardless.
Why both parties? If just the mother's life is in danger, doesn't she have the right to kill in self-defense?

"I know some of you are going to say 'I did look it up, and that's not true.' That's 'cause you looked it up in a book. Next time, look it up in your gut."
-Stephen Colbert

This message is a reply to:
 Message 9 by Hyroglyphx, posted 02-24-2007 9:54 PM Hyroglyphx has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 75 by Hyroglyphx, posted 03-01-2007 11:59 AM Dan Carroll has replied

  
crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1487 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003


Message 47 of 230 (387435)
02-28-2007 2:18 PM
Reply to: Message 44 by Hyroglyphx
02-28-2007 1:37 PM


Re: Probability
Excuse me? Your scenarios are ridiculous and I already explained them thoroughly.
No, you just dismissed them without addressing them. And you've completely ignored the fact that these things happen in countries that criminalize abortion. Miscarriage becomes a crime; mothers become criminals when they're blamed for miscarrying "on purpose."
You took this thread to another level.
Yeah - to the level of "thinking about the consequences of the policies you advocate." In other words I took it to the level you should have taken it to, yourself.
Which you would have taken it to if this was about saving "innocent lives", not shaming sluts. You said yourself this was about "selfish women". What is that if not slut-shaming?
My desire to have abortion banned is because it is tantamount to murder.
Yet, you've shown no interest in telling us how you would enforce such a ban, or how you would prosecute cases of what you describe as "murder." You must realize that an unenforced ban doesn't save any "lives", right?
The only reason that wouldn't concern you is because you're being disingenuous, and this isn't about saving anybody at all - this is about making sure that sexually active women know exactly what you think of them. Slut-shaming, in other words. Why else would you be motivated to talk about "selfishness"?
Its the intent. It always boils down to the intent.
And how would you determine intent? That's the question you're begging, and avoiding. For the third time, now. Amazing how obvious it is that you're not at all concerned about stopping abortions - you're concerned with the sex lives of women. It's embarrassingly prurient on your part.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 44 by Hyroglyphx, posted 02-28-2007 1:37 PM Hyroglyphx has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 77 by Hyroglyphx, posted 03-01-2007 1:01 PM crashfrog has replied

  
DrJones*
Member
Posts: 2285
From: Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Joined: 08-19-2004
Member Rating: 7.2


Message 48 of 230 (387439)
02-28-2007 2:31 PM
Reply to: Message 40 by Hyroglyphx
02-28-2007 10:42 AM


Re: Probability
No, not at all
Then how will you know if the miscarriage is a miscarriage or a "miscarriage"?

Just a monkey in a long line of kings.
If "elitist" just means "not the dumbest motherfucker in the room", I'll be an elitist!
*not an actual doctor

This message is a reply to:
 Message 40 by Hyroglyphx, posted 02-28-2007 10:42 AM Hyroglyphx has not replied

  
DrJones*
Member
Posts: 2285
From: Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Joined: 08-19-2004
Member Rating: 7.2


Message 49 of 230 (387441)
02-28-2007 2:37 PM
Reply to: Message 44 by Hyroglyphx
02-28-2007 1:37 PM


Re: Probability
When somebody dies mysteriously, there is always an autopsy performed
How much of an autopsy can you do on a 1 month old fetus that has been "miscarried"?

Just a monkey in a long line of kings.
If "elitist" just means "not the dumbest motherfucker in the room", I'll be an elitist!
*not an actual doctor

This message is a reply to:
 Message 44 by Hyroglyphx, posted 02-28-2007 1:37 PM Hyroglyphx has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 80 by Hyroglyphx, posted 03-01-2007 4:29 PM DrJones* has not replied

  
Hyroglyphx
Inactive Member


Message 50 of 230 (387446)
02-28-2007 3:44 PM
Reply to: Message 33 by RAZD
02-27-2007 10:39 PM


Re: Who is ...
An unwanted fetus forces itself upon the woman, and rather relentlessly.
An unwanted fetus forces itself upon the woman? Are you being jocular?

"A man can no more diminish God's glory by refusing to worship Him than a lunatic can put out the sun by scribbling the word, 'darkness' on the walls of his cell." -C.S. Lewis

This message is a reply to:
 Message 33 by RAZD, posted 02-27-2007 10:39 PM RAZD has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 53 by docpotato, posted 02-28-2007 5:26 PM Hyroglyphx has not replied
 Message 54 by RAZD, posted 02-28-2007 6:38 PM Hyroglyphx has replied

  
Hyroglyphx
Inactive Member


Message 51 of 230 (387458)
02-28-2007 4:25 PM
Reply to: Message 34 by nator
02-27-2007 10:56 PM


Re: Probability
But juggs, this is MURDER in the first degree, isn't it? Why wouldn't law enforcement use fake clinics and pose as doctors to sting people planning to commit premeditated murder?
Because abortion is not illegal. But in the event it was, what you are describing would be entrapment.
Are you willing to send 13 year old incest victims to prison for decades, or life?
13 year olds don't go to jail for life. They serve a sentence in juvenile detention centers and then when they come of age, they are either released, serve parole, or are recommended to the adult prison system.
Are you willing to send mothers and fathers to prison as accessories to murder?
If they are in fact accessories, why wouldn't we?
But, are you willing to send a 13 year old molestation victim to prison because she planned and carried out a premeditated murder?
Is there any difference from being dismembered in the womb than there is a woman who gives birth and throws their baby in a dumpster? If you say, no, then why?
Because this is what you are calling abortion. Premeditated murder.
Right?
If you knowingly and intentionally kill an innocent person, that is what constitutes murder. So, yes, its premeditated murder. Why shouldn't it be. When a madman stabs a pregnant woman in the stomach, killing both mother and child, he is charged with double-homicide, is he not? Where then is the line of demarcation for becoming a human? Whether or not the mom says so?
If you really believe that aborting a fetus is exactly the same as stabbing a newborn in the face with a sharp metal object, then why all the pussy-footing around my questions, juggs?
I haven't had a chance to respond to you once on this thread, so where am I "pussy-footing?" This reply is the beginning of our dialogue.
I think most people who advocate for forced pregnancy and childbirth haven't bothered to think for a single moment about the ramifications of such a thing.
Explain to me the ramifications. My wife had a child before she was able to properly care for her. What did she do? She did the unselfish, and far more difficult thing to do, which is give her up for adoption. Now she lives in a loving family and we visit her at least once a year. Tragic, isn't it? But maybe you're right. Perhaps she would have been better off being torn limb from limb.
So, since most fertilized eggs never implant in a woman's uterus, should we begin to collect all women's menstrual discharge to search for those precious babies?
What part of "intent" do you folk not understand? If there is a miscarriage, there isn't anything you can do about that. But placing a shop-vac in your birth canal, you can choose not to do. Food for thought.
Edited by nemesis_juggernaut, : typo

"A man can no more diminish God's glory by refusing to worship Him than a lunatic can put out the sun by scribbling the word, 'darkness' on the walls of his cell." -C.S. Lewis

This message is a reply to:
 Message 34 by nator, posted 02-27-2007 10:56 PM nator has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 52 by Dan Carroll, posted 02-28-2007 4:34 PM Hyroglyphx has not replied
 Message 57 by macaroniandcheese, posted 02-28-2007 7:18 PM Hyroglyphx has not replied
 Message 62 by nator, posted 02-28-2007 8:51 PM Hyroglyphx has not replied

  
Dan Carroll
Inactive Member


Message 52 of 230 (387460)
02-28-2007 4:34 PM
Reply to: Message 51 by Hyroglyphx
02-28-2007 4:25 PM


Re: Probability
13 year olds don't go to jail for life.
Sigh.
Sigh again.
Sigh once more.
Seriously, NJ. Just ten seconds on google before you post. That's all I ask.

"I know some of you are going to say 'I did look it up, and that's not true.' That's 'cause you looked it up in a book. Next time, look it up in your gut."
-Stephen Colbert

This message is a reply to:
 Message 51 by Hyroglyphx, posted 02-28-2007 4:25 PM Hyroglyphx has not replied

  
docpotato
Member (Idle past 5067 days)
Posts: 334
From: Portland, OR
Joined: 07-18-2003


Message 53 of 230 (387480)
02-28-2007 5:26 PM
Reply to: Message 50 by Hyroglyphx
02-28-2007 3:44 PM


Re: Who is ...
Hey, we live in the same city. Let me come over, stay at your house for nine months, and all the while I'll eat your food, punch you in the stomach, and then forcibly stretch your genitals before I leave! Don't want me there? Fuck you! I'm stayin' and you can't kill me!
Oh yeah, and ejecting me from your house will kill me too.
Edited by docpotato, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 50 by Hyroglyphx, posted 02-28-2007 3:44 PM Hyroglyphx has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 70 by FliesOnly, posted 03-01-2007 6:57 AM docpotato has not replied

  
RAZD
Member (Idle past 1425 days)
Posts: 20714
From: the other end of the sidewalk
Joined: 03-14-2004


Message 54 of 230 (387490)
02-28-2007 6:38 PM
Reply to: Message 50 by Hyroglyphx
02-28-2007 3:44 PM


Re: Who is ...
An unwanted fetus forces itself upon the woman, and rather relentlessly.
An unwanted fetus forces itself upon the woman? Are you being jocular?
That you don't see or consider the validity of this argument is very telling.
You think it must be a {joke} rather than confront the reality of the situation.
Of course that also means that maternity clothes are a big scam as women don't really need them eh? All the stuff you hear about "morning sickness" is also a put on yes?
It's all in the head isn't it NJ?
Are you really that clueless?

Join the effort to unravel AIDS/HIV, unfold Proteomes, fight Cancer,
compare Fiocruz Genome and fight Muscular Dystrophy with Team EvC! (click)


we are limited in our ability to understand
by our ability to understand
RebelAAmericanOZen[Deist
... to learn ... to think ... to live ... to laugh ...
to share.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 50 by Hyroglyphx, posted 02-28-2007 3:44 PM Hyroglyphx has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 87 by Hyroglyphx, posted 03-01-2007 9:55 PM RAZD has replied

  
macaroniandcheese 
Suspended Member (Idle past 3948 days)
Posts: 4258
Joined: 05-24-2004


Message 55 of 230 (387491)
02-28-2007 6:59 PM
Reply to: Message 42 by FliesOnly
02-28-2007 11:29 AM


Re: Probability
when my mother miscarried in 1980, they investigated her to make sure she hadn't done it on purpose... and this was with legal abortions.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 42 by FliesOnly, posted 02-28-2007 11:29 AM FliesOnly has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 71 by FliesOnly, posted 03-01-2007 7:01 AM macaroniandcheese has not replied

  
macaroniandcheese 
Suspended Member (Idle past 3948 days)
Posts: 4258
Joined: 05-24-2004


Message 56 of 230 (387492)
02-28-2007 7:02 PM
Reply to: Message 43 by nator
02-28-2007 12:42 PM


Re: let's interject some facts
studies are of the devil!!!
especially yours.
we've been discussing the fact that abortion rates and unplanned pregnancy rates are directly related to quality sex education and contraceptive availability and use. they have ignored it since day one.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 43 by nator, posted 02-28-2007 12:42 PM nator has not replied

  
macaroniandcheese 
Suspended Member (Idle past 3948 days)
Posts: 4258
Joined: 05-24-2004


Message 57 of 230 (387496)
02-28-2007 7:18 PM
Reply to: Message 51 by Hyroglyphx
02-28-2007 4:25 PM


Re: Probability
Is there any difference from being dismembered in the womb than there is a woman who gives birth and throws their baby in a dumpster? If you say, no, then why?
you say that as though there's any members to dis. most abortions happen before there are any members.
13 year olds don't go to jail for life. They serve a sentence in juvenile detention centers and then when they come of age, they are either released, serve parole, or are recommended to the adult prison system.
HA!
When a madman stabs a pregnant woman in the stomach, killing both mother and child, he is charged with double-homicide, is he not?
thanks to laws passed by pro-lifers for the specific purpose of making this argument. what does the bible say about a man who kills a pregnant woman or causes her to miscarry?
Where then is the line of demarcation for becoming a human?
birth.
Perhaps she would have been better off being torn limb from limb.
probably, considering the horrible psychological disfunctions caused by abandonment issues. visitation or not. but this isn't an argument unless every pro-lifer volunteers to adopt every child destined for abortion. do you know how many children are in the system? until there are no children waiting for homes, this arguments is flawed.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 51 by Hyroglyphx, posted 02-28-2007 4:25 PM Hyroglyphx has not replied

  
tudwell
Member (Idle past 5998 days)
Posts: 172
From: KCMO
Joined: 08-20-2006


Message 58 of 230 (387499)
02-28-2007 7:46 PM
Reply to: Message 44 by Hyroglyphx
02-28-2007 1:37 PM


Re: Probability
If there is trauma shown, that's a lead you follow.
If a woman fell down the stairs, there would be trauma whether it was intentional or not. How would you tell if it's intentional?
It always boils down to the intent.
And you can't determine intent through an autopsy, meaning you would have to investigate every single miscarriage, if an intentional miscarriage is illegal.
The OP was simply asking pro-lifers what circumstances would they allow an abortion. I gave one. You took this thread to another level.
Actually, this is exactly what I wanted the thread to be. I wanted to examine your proposed limits on abortion, not just hear them. I think it's going quite well.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 44 by Hyroglyphx, posted 02-28-2007 1:37 PM Hyroglyphx has not replied

  
Hyroglyphx
Inactive Member


Message 59 of 230 (387501)
02-28-2007 8:12 PM
Reply to: Message 36 by FliesOnly
02-28-2007 8:30 AM


Re: Probability
You have pregnant women at the top of the stairs. Because of people like you, NJ, abortions are now illegal. Now, this women really doesn't want to have a baby so she purposefully throws herself down the stairs in an attempt to have a miscarriage. How would examining her uterus determine if she purposefully threw herself down the stairs or not? Get it? How will you find out if she accidentally tripped or if she fell on purpose?
Read what I'm saying because I've explained very clearly. The ambivalence is all on your side of the table. If you come home one day and you find a family of yours dead at the bottom of the stairs in a pool of blood, are you going to throw your hands in the air in incredulity, and say, "Well, we don't if they tripped or if they were pushed. What on earth are we to do?"
You get someone to investigate it. Its the same with the hypothetical scenario. Its entirely possible that many people have been murdered on a stair case, whether pregnant or not, that got away. But you don't use this as some sort of reason re-legalize abortion in the event that some people get away with it. If they escape human justice, let be on their conscience until a Higher Authority deals with the act.
So what I think Crashfrog is trying to get across is that are numerous ways one could feign a miscarriage quite legally. And under your proposed idea...every instance in which a miscarriage occurred would have to be investigated as murder.
No, it really wouldn't. It would be handled like any other gynecological exam. If abortion were illegal then gynecologists would likely be mandated to speak out should any suspicions of a self-induced abortion present themselves. If the gynecologist lied for the mother because he was sympathetic to the pro-abortion movement, then let that be on his conscience too until a Higher Authority deals with it.

"A man can no more diminish God's glory by refusing to worship Him than a lunatic can put out the sun by scribbling the word, 'darkness' on the walls of his cell." -C.S. Lewis

This message is a reply to:
 Message 36 by FliesOnly, posted 02-28-2007 8:30 AM FliesOnly has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 60 by DrJones*, posted 02-28-2007 8:25 PM Hyroglyphx has not replied
 Message 64 by crashfrog, posted 02-28-2007 10:34 PM Hyroglyphx has not replied
 Message 72 by FliesOnly, posted 03-01-2007 7:49 AM Hyroglyphx has not replied

  
DrJones*
Member
Posts: 2285
From: Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Joined: 08-19-2004
Member Rating: 7.2


Message 60 of 230 (387502)
02-28-2007 8:25 PM
Reply to: Message 59 by Hyroglyphx
02-28-2007 8:12 PM


Re: Probability
quote:
every instance in which a miscarriage occurred would have to be investigated as murder.
No, it really wouldn't.
Then how would you determine what was a legitimate miscarriage and what wasn't?
You get someone to investigate it.
So you do want to launch a police investigation into every miscarriage.

Just a monkey in a long line of kings.
If "elitist" just means "not the dumbest motherfucker in the room", I'll be an elitist!
*not an actual doctor

This message is a reply to:
 Message 59 by Hyroglyphx, posted 02-28-2007 8:12 PM Hyroglyphx has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024