Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
0 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,484 Year: 3,741/9,624 Month: 612/974 Week: 225/276 Day: 1/64 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Limits on Abortion
nator
Member (Idle past 2192 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 125 of 230 (387858)
03-03-2007 7:59 AM
Reply to: Message 123 by Dr Jack
03-03-2007 7:54 AM


Re: hypocrites
Here's my source, which I linked to previously:
Page Not Found | Guttmacher Institute

This message is a reply to:
 Message 123 by Dr Jack, posted 03-03-2007 7:54 AM Dr Jack has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 128 by Dr Jack, posted 03-03-2007 8:05 AM nator has not replied

  
nator
Member (Idle past 2192 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 157 of 230 (387982)
03-03-2007 8:23 PM
Reply to: Message 144 by Hyroglyphx
03-03-2007 4:34 PM


Re: Answering the detractors
quote:
When you tell your family or friends that you are pregnant, the first thing that comes to their mind is to congratulate you.
If I was pregnant and then told my husband, he would NOT congratulate me, believe me.
It would be a bad, bad day.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 144 by Hyroglyphx, posted 03-03-2007 4:34 PM Hyroglyphx has not replied

  
nator
Member (Idle past 2192 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 160 of 230 (387988)
03-03-2007 8:31 PM


still no response to my posts...
Still waiting...

  
nator
Member (Idle past 2192 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 195 of 230 (388128)
03-04-2007 6:55 PM
Reply to: Message 182 by anastasia
03-04-2007 2:25 PM


Re: Obvious Examples
And, what? You honestly can't figure out why national organizations that claim to oppose abortion are completely uninterested in promoting policies that reduce abortions?
quote:
Apparently, no one has figured it out. If you know the answer, why is this question even still a question?
Ana, you are far too intellignet for this response.
You show all the signs of mere coyness.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 182 by anastasia, posted 03-04-2007 2:25 PM anastasia has not replied

  
nator
Member (Idle past 2192 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 196 of 230 (388132)
03-04-2007 7:08 PM
Reply to: Message 190 by Hyroglyphx
03-04-2007 3:37 PM


Re: Proactive solution...
quote:
Everybody knows, including young children, how babies are made. We all know what contraceptives are. We all know about venereal diseases.
That is incredibly NOT true.
Here is a list of common myths regarding contraception and sex and STD's:
Birth Control and Contraception Myths
Here's more:
http://www.teengrowth.com/index.cfm?action=info_article&I...
...and more:
http://www.ppae.ab.ca/index.php?m=3&s=1

This message is a reply to:
 Message 190 by Hyroglyphx, posted 03-04-2007 3:37 PM Hyroglyphx has not replied

  
nator
Member (Idle past 2192 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 204 of 230 (388206)
03-05-2007 8:43 AM
Reply to: Message 198 by Hyroglyphx
03-04-2007 9:14 PM


Re: What countries? U.S. history.
quote:
And since conception does not occur instantaneously, there is enough time to take the morning-after-pill which will do nothing if the fertilization process has already begun or it will stop that implantation of a fertilized egg.
Huh?
But I thought that you believed that life begins when the egg is fertilized? Most of the time, this occurs sometime during the egg's trip along the fallopian tubes, before it gets into the uterus.
If you are purposely preventing the implantation of a fertilized egg, you are preventing the implantation of a human being, aren't you?
If I have misunderstood your position, please correct me.
When, exactly, do you believe a human being exists?
As a post script, I'd also like to know if and when you are going to address any of my later posts in this thread.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 198 by Hyroglyphx, posted 03-04-2007 9:14 PM Hyroglyphx has not replied

  
nator
Member (Idle past 2192 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 206 of 230 (388225)
03-05-2007 9:53 AM
Reply to: Message 202 by Rahvin
03-05-2007 5:05 AM


Re: What countries? U.S. history.
Really good post, Rahvin.
Thank you.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 202 by Rahvin, posted 03-05-2007 5:05 AM Rahvin has not replied

  
nator
Member (Idle past 2192 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 214 of 230 (388272)
03-05-2007 1:27 PM
Reply to: Message 210 by Hyroglyphx
03-05-2007 12:35 PM


Re: Answering the detractors
quote:
There is a fixed point... Its at conception. The nano-second a sperm fertilizes an egg is the precise point in time where a brand new person generates. Call it God or call it nature, but it is more than evident that this is the case.
So, does this mean that you wish to collect all of the menstrual fluid of sexually active women, since there are better than 50% chance that there will be a person in there?
Shouldn't all of those people get decent burials if they are deceased, or be frozen, and later implanted into uteruses, if they are still viable?
Edited by nator, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 210 by Hyroglyphx, posted 03-05-2007 12:35 PM Hyroglyphx has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024