|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
EvC Forum active members: 65 (9162 total) |
| |
popoi | |
Total: 915,817 Year: 3,074/9,624 Month: 919/1,588 Week: 102/223 Day: 0/13 Hour: 0/0 |
Thread ▼ Details |
|
|
Author | Topic: Should Evolution and Creation be Taught in School? | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
fooj Junior Member (Idle past 6121 days) Posts: 22 Joined: |
The title of my topic should give you a clue as to what situation you are in. You need a job in a public school. I don't think you have a chance to get a fair hearing. Historical Geography? My personal belief is that altho I am a YECer, I don't think creationism should be taught in public schools. (Moreover, I yet to see where evolution is used in technological applications.)
Edited by fooj, : bad grammar.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
fooj Junior Member (Idle past 6121 days) Posts: 22 Joined: |
quote:A theory (aka strong conclusion) which brings with it no discernable technological benefits cannot be a fact. Edited by fooj, : bad posting result.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
fooj Junior Member (Idle past 6121 days) Posts: 22 Joined: |
quote:Biology would exist with Darwin's theory; Geology is just earth physics; and medicine never needed Darwin's theory when DNA was discovered.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
fooj Junior Member (Idle past 6121 days) Posts: 22 Joined: |
quote:The method for decoding DNA comes with genes, thus I disagree that genetics is based upon Darwin's Theory of evolution. While it is true that most geologists have the premise of an old earth, a young earth geology fits in well with Gold's theory of a hot biosphere. Secondly, astronomy borders on psuedoscience by giving us theories of light years and black holes. I subscribe to the nuclear plasmologist's theory of astronomy. There was no big bang, the universe gave no indication of when it began but life on earth began suddenly. Lastly, while the theory of Gold's and the nuclear plasmologist are technically discoveries made by two evolutionists, they fit in well with a young earth creationist model. No light years, no fossil fuels, no black holes. C has always been about the max speed of an electron. (I believe photons are much faster than 186K-miles/sec.) There will never be overwhelming proof of an old earth at this rate.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
fooj Junior Member (Idle past 6121 days) Posts: 22 Joined: |
I meant a nuclear plasmologist's theory. I wish I knew the guy's name. He discovered galaxies, "gas clouds", stars all exhibit plasma matter like behavior.
Edited by fooj, : Adding some detail.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
fooj Junior Member (Idle past 6121 days) Posts: 22 Joined: |
quote:The worldwide flood was not dependent on any DNA bottlenecks. Rather bottlenecks would prevent a good outcome from a flood which is described in genesis. (eg, fresh water mixing with salt water). The flood merely curtained the mountains or hills; and there was an ideal gene pool from which everything spring. DNA became limited by change in atmosphere, and inbreeding became a problem. I don't believe most fossils are flood related though, since the earth was cleaved after the flood. This happened because of the waters on the high place (translated heaven) broke. quote:I think you are overeacting. If it is not plausible fact as you say, noone will waste their time teaching it. You also have failed to show how genetics can be random. Since the tools for decoding are in the organism and since 'primates' are not like bugs, they could not have speciated into human beings. There is no mechanism in the sperm of apes and primates to suggest the ability to speciate. quote:I think it is relevent to point out when an unusual model is forced into an old-earth chronology, when it points the other way.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
fooj Junior Member (Idle past 6121 days) Posts: 22 Joined: |
plamacist then. The reference is still very obscure. I wish I could find it.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
fooj Junior Member (Idle past 6121 days) Posts: 22 Joined: |
quote:Electrons have been observes to go very close to C, but photons are likely too fast to be seen going places. Since light is either made of electrons or photon then light is either at the speed of C or much faster. If light is electrons, then everyone is wrong. I very much doubt light is loose electrons, but I could be wrong.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
fooj Junior Member (Idle past 6121 days) Posts: 22 Joined: |
quote:C is actually the speed of electromagnetic wave propagation. If the electron makes photons by decaying, that suggests photons are much faster than an electron which would be C. I don't make these things up; some just don't understand the facts well. Edited by fooj, : No reason given.
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024