If nothing is imperfect, then doesn't that suggest that everything IS perfect o.O? And if everything is perfect, then wouldn't that include nothing ? Regardless, "nothing is imperfect" is pretty much a false statement, don't you think?
Maybe the question is: Is nature perfect or imperfect? I would posit that nature is only perfectly imperfect. There really is no perfect equality, no perfect vacuum, no absolute zero, no evolutionary progress, no ontological purpose, no hope for entropy reversal or eternal Truth, just a profusion of chaos that has little swirls of order here and there to make us think we can claim some measure of perfection in an imperfect world.
Nature would have to have a purpose to be perfect. (And why would God need to roll the dice so often if He really had a purpose?)
”HM