Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,422 Year: 3,679/9,624 Month: 550/974 Week: 163/276 Day: 3/34 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   More Evidence of Evolution - Geomyidae and Geomydoecus
NosyNed
Member
Posts: 9003
From: Canada
Joined: 04-04-2003


Message 3 of 96 (388919)
03-08-2007 7:14 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by crashfrog
03-08-2007 3:41 PM


The problem with this kind of support
This is good stuff Crash! And, as usual, you do a good job of presenting an analysis of an inference from it.
But there is a big problem with this kind of support for the evolutionary model --- it is too good.
It is detailed, rather precise and supports careful analysis (even including mathematics). It is powerful as science.
The problem is the folks that need "proof" are operating on a level of knowledge and conceptual understanding (and in some cases intelligence) that is light years below this. To them this sounds like cleaverly constructed baffle-gab. No light bulbs light up above their heads; no "ah-ha"s escape their lips. They can't even read what you've posted with any comprehension. The concepts are all alien to them.
These folk are operating as if we should find a fish fossil with fully formed, clawed, reptilian forearms for front fins. They have no hope of getting this.
ABE
'sides - they don't want to.
Edited by NosyNed, : a further tought

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by crashfrog, posted 03-08-2007 3:41 PM crashfrog has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 4 by crashfrog, posted 03-08-2007 7:42 PM NosyNed has not replied

  
NosyNed
Member
Posts: 9003
From: Canada
Joined: 04-04-2003


Message 8 of 96 (388968)
03-09-2007 1:21 PM
Reply to: Message 7 by MartinV
03-09-2007 1:19 PM


contradicting the source
It would be helpful if you explained your reasoning behind this.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 7 by MartinV, posted 03-09-2007 1:19 PM MartinV has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 9 by Chiroptera, posted 03-09-2007 1:42 PM NosyNed has not replied
 Message 10 by MartinV, posted 03-09-2007 2:03 PM NosyNed has not replied

  
NosyNed
Member
Posts: 9003
From: Canada
Joined: 04-04-2003


Message 15 of 96 (388986)
03-09-2007 3:36 PM
Reply to: Message 12 by MartinV
03-09-2007 2:31 PM


MV's critisism is?
It's only proof for darwinists.I see explanation that two unrelated organisms speciate in the same way via undirected random mutation picked up by natural selection as utterly ridiculous and as darwinistic fancy.
Yea, yea, you don't have to repeat yourself. We know what you think.
What exactly is wrong with the reasoning presented in this particular case and what alternative explanation do you have?
It seems you are, yet again, simply ranting with no foundation for your own personal idiosyncratic opinions.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 12 by MartinV, posted 03-09-2007 2:31 PM MartinV has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024