This is good stuff Crash! And, as usual, you do a good job of presenting an analysis of an inference from it.
But there is a big problem with this kind of support for the evolutionary model --- it is too good.
It is detailed, rather precise and supports careful analysis (even including mathematics). It is powerful as science.
The problem is the folks that need "proof" are operating on a level of knowledge and conceptual understanding (and in some cases intelligence) that is light years below this. To them this sounds like cleaverly constructed baffle-gab. No light bulbs light up above their heads; no "ah-ha"s escape their lips. They can't even read what you've posted with any comprehension. The concepts are all alien to them.
These folk are operating as if we should find a fish fossil with fully formed, clawed, reptilian forearms for front fins. They have no hope of getting this.
ABE
'sides - they don't want to.
Edited by NosyNed, : a further tought