Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,422 Year: 3,679/9,624 Month: 550/974 Week: 163/276 Day: 3/34 Hour: 1/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   True science follows the evidence wherever it leads (The design of the eye)
sidelined
Member (Idle past 5929 days)
Posts: 3435
From: Edmonton Alberta Canada
Joined: 08-30-2003


Message 32 of 49 (389547)
03-14-2007 7:31 AM
Reply to: Message 1 by ICdesign
03-12-2007 9:51 PM


ICDESIGN
In my opinion Intelligent Design is a fact not a theory. True science follows the evidence wherever it leads so lets look at the evidence closest to home for each of us, the human body. When we examine the human body we find complex systems working together that enable us to do very amazing things such as walk, talk, hear, eat, think, heal, etc. Now each of these systems are extremely complex are they not? Complexity requires forethought.
I have some questions. Is the intelligence part of intelligent design, which you propose is responsible for complexity, more complex than that which has been designed?
If not, how did it come to be capable of design of processes more complex than itself? In other words what mechanism allows it to circumvent this?
If so, and the intelligent design is more complex than that which it designed, then what intelligent design designed this complexity?
Edited by sidelined, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by ICdesign, posted 03-12-2007 9:51 PM ICdesign has not replied

sidelined
Member (Idle past 5929 days)
Posts: 3435
From: Edmonton Alberta Canada
Joined: 08-30-2003


Message 35 of 49 (389649)
03-14-2007 6:21 PM
Reply to: Message 34 by ICdesign
03-14-2007 6:14 PM


Knoockout punch completely misses its target
ICDESIGN
unlike the other Terminator, "I won't be back"
Well that is a shame since I will assume that you are not capable of answering my post #32 and will have to guess that it is because you cannot back up your arguements at all.
See YA'
Edited by sidelined, : No reason given.

"The world is so exquisite, with so much love and moral depth, that there is no reason to deceive ourselves with pretty stories for which there's little good evidence. Far better, it seems to me, in our vulnerability, is to look Death in the eye and to be grateful every day for the brief but magnificent opportunity that life provides." - Carl Sagan, Billions and Billions

This message is a reply to:
 Message 34 by ICdesign, posted 03-14-2007 6:14 PM ICdesign has not replied

sidelined
Member (Idle past 5929 days)
Posts: 3435
From: Edmonton Alberta Canada
Joined: 08-30-2003


Message 42 of 49 (389668)
03-14-2007 7:42 PM
Reply to: Message 41 by RAZD
03-14-2007 7:33 PM


Re: THE KNOCK OUT PUNCH & JUDY SHOW
RAZD
Heck, RAZD, he didn't even take the time to explain intelligent design itself when I offered to explore the consequences of it. I think it would have been a perfect time to step up to the plate and take a swing.
Shame that the amateurs never get past their egos long enough to make it into the big leagues eh?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 41 by RAZD, posted 03-14-2007 7:33 PM RAZD has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024