Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,833 Year: 4,090/9,624 Month: 961/974 Week: 288/286 Day: 9/40 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   "New genetic material" --- QUESTION
SR71
Member (Idle past 6243 days)
Posts: 38
Joined: 05-07-2006


Message 1 of 10 (390780)
03-21-2007 9:18 PM


I have a question that should be pretty simple for most of you to answer. I have a teacher who loves to preach (I'm in High school), and I just let him do it. I don't want a confrontation ruining my grade as it has in the past. He says some pretty offensive things, for example, "Atheism spits in the face of logic" etc. Anyway, this is not my question, it's just background.
This is a Spanish class, and the other day we couldn't do Spanish classwork because the day was messed up due to state testing. So we talked about other things. The discussion led to him stating that the earth is only 6000 years old (talking about global warming). Blah blah blah, he ends up saying how ridiculous it is to say that Species + Species = New Species, which is apparently his idea of macroevolution.
I straightened some things up, and he produced many new excuses which I've heard before thanks to this forum. One thing he said, though, was something I couldn't talk about due to lack of knowledge. He stated that new genetic material cannot enter the gene pool. Obviously you can see how this is necessary for evolution to happen. He said he majored in Biology in college for a while, and that this is one of the most fundamental concepts of biology.
Can you explain this for me? I don't plan on confronting him with the information, I am just curious. And I am totally expecting to find out that it's complete bullshit.
Edited by Adminnemooseus, : Added the "bolding".

Replies to this message:
 Message 3 by crashfrog, posted 03-21-2007 10:23 PM SR71 has replied
 Message 6 by Allopatrik, posted 03-22-2007 12:38 PM SR71 has not replied
 Message 7 by Dr Adequate, posted 03-22-2007 1:51 PM SR71 has not replied

  
SR71
Member (Idle past 6243 days)
Posts: 38
Joined: 05-07-2006


Message 4 of 10 (390838)
03-22-2007 9:27 AM
Reply to: Message 3 by crashfrog
03-21-2007 10:23 PM


quote:
Well, that's clearly false. Mutation is one way that new genetic material enters gene pools, and genetic material can move from one gene pool to another as individuals move from one population to another.
This makes me glad that my reply to him was "I don't believe that." I couldn't make a definite statement, because I simply didn't know for sure. But I knew that it would be a major problem with any theory of evolution and nobody would believe it.
quote:
Suffice to say, it is not. It may be a fundamental principle that he's pulled out of his ass, but it has nothing to do with the biology that represents consensus science.
I love it! I won't tell him this, as much as I'd love to, but it's good to know.
quote:
Where did he "major in biology", anyway? Bob Jones University?
Haha! I'm pretty sure he went to LSU like almost everyone around here. Either way, he changed his major to some foreign literature degree.
Edited by SR71, : Quote tags messed up

This message is a reply to:
 Message 3 by crashfrog, posted 03-21-2007 10:23 PM crashfrog has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 5 by Chiroptera, posted 03-22-2007 10:12 AM SR71 has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024