Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9163 total)
1 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,419 Year: 3,676/9,624 Month: 547/974 Week: 160/276 Day: 0/34 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   too intelligent to actually be intelligent?
anglagard
Member (Idle past 858 days)
Posts: 2339
From: Socorro, New Mexico USA
Joined: 03-18-2006


Message 75 of 304 (390356)
03-19-2007 10:26 PM
Reply to: Message 29 by ICdesign
03-18-2007 9:55 PM


Re: back to my opening statement please
Well, you want to hear from others.
It is obvious to anyone who even just casually peruses the relevant literature that the resulting 'design' of living organisms is based upon the history of that said organism, not on the micromanagement of any supposed deity. Otherwise, such designs would be optimal as opposed to jerry-rigged, as is observed in nature.
Don't get mad, get educated!
Edited by anglagard, : signature

Light things float and heavy things sink - any unbiased kindergardner
The more we understand particular things, the more we understand God -Spinoza

This message is a reply to:
 Message 29 by ICdesign, posted 03-18-2007 9:55 PM ICdesign has not replied

anglagard
Member (Idle past 858 days)
Posts: 2339
From: Socorro, New Mexico USA
Joined: 03-18-2006


Message 239 of 304 (391321)
03-24-2007 2:23 PM
Reply to: Message 238 by ICdesign
03-24-2007 2:13 PM


Re: known & unknown
ICDESIGN writes:
Again, their are 112,000,000
links at Google that testify of a design with purpose and
intelligent genius. These are the true facts!
There are 160,000,000 that testify to design and random.
So what?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 238 by ICdesign, posted 03-24-2007 2:13 PM ICdesign has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024