Ok, here are the first two Laws of Thermodynamics.
The First Law of Thermodynamics:
In any process, the total energy of the universe remains constant.
The Second Law of Thermodynamics:
There is no process that, operating in a cycle, produces no other effect than the subtraction of a positive amount of heat from a reservoir and the production of an equal amount of work.
That's basically correct. I gather you copied it from some text book.
The rest of your post is cranky garbage. Let me make you a favor and shred it for you...
Evolution is not a theory; Special Creation is not a theory.
Both are models for explaining the origin
You contradicted yourself.
That's what atheory is: A model for explaining some observation.
Evolution would occur far too slow to be observed
You are mistaken.
Evolution has already been observed.
and the bulk of evolution would have occured in the distant past
Pointless statement because being in the distant past does not preclude observation
Becaise neither model can be "proven" this means that neither model can be "disproven".
Non-sequitur
The basic postulate of Evolution is a "law" of increasing organization, which introduces new systems into higher systems;
That one is a misconception about what the theory of evolution is.
The evolution model postulates an increase in useable energy, information, and complexity of living organisms.
More misconceptions.
Evolution model propses a contradiction to the Second Law of Thermodynamics.
Evolution does not occur as a "cycle that produces no other effect than the subtraction of a positive amount of heat from a reservoir and the production of an equal amount of work.", or any other equivalent statement.
Therefore the 2LoT has no application here...
Edited by fallacycop, : typos
™ Version 4.2