crashfrog wrote:
Are you a "scientist" like you claimed to be? I'd like to read some of your published work, if so. (Do you save your nonsense just for us, or inflict it on the journals, too?) Can you pop me a few bibliographies? Email would be fine if you don't want to break anonymity.
I did what crashfrog requested of me by way of email. I did it in the spirit of friendship and with good intentions. Bad idea! Here is his email response:
quote:
Interesting, but it only makes it even more inexplicable that a
limnologist would make the astounding errors of basic science that
I've seen you make.
It's not out of pique that we're telling you these things. If you
could get over your obviously great infatuation with your own obtuse
metaphors and glib comebacks, you'd find yourself with considerable
opportunities to engage in constructive dialogue.
I'm just an interested amateur with aspirations, and I think it's
pretty clear you don't consider my contributions worth serious
consideration. But you did feel it was important to answer my
questions, I guess. Maybe that says something.
Well, now I feel like Charlie Brown right after Lucy pulled the football away. I should have known better, since I already knew this boy has a real big wad in his underwear.
”HM