Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9162 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 915,806 Year: 3,063/9,624 Month: 908/1,588 Week: 91/223 Day: 2/17 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   How can Biologists believe in the ToE?
AdminNosy
Administrator
Posts: 4754
From: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Joined: 11-11-2003


Message 2 of 304 (392566)
04-01-2007 11:39 AM


Thread moved here from the Proposed New Topics forum.

AdminNosy
Administrator
Posts: 4754
From: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Joined: 11-11-2003


Message 33 of 304 (393474)
04-05-2007 10:56 AM


Topic Warning
ICANT's laundry list of questions will destroy this thread with topic digressions.
ICANT: As suggested pick individual questions and open threads for each. Try to go back to what you should have learned and pick those actually relevant to evolutionary biology.
I'm closing the topic for a couple of hours to allow everyone to note that they should avoid ICANT laundry list.

AdminNosy
Administrator
Posts: 4754
From: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Joined: 11-11-2003


Message 105 of 304 (419765)
09-04-2007 5:03 PM
Reply to: Message 104 by EighteenDelta
09-04-2007 4:33 PM


Misaimed Reply?
I think, 18D, that you intended to reply to Vashgun and not Dr. A.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 104 by EighteenDelta, posted 09-04-2007 4:33 PM EighteenDelta has not replied

AdminNosy
Administrator
Posts: 4754
From: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Joined: 11-11-2003


Message 148 of 304 (420314)
09-07-2007 12:33 PM


Topic!!!
The list of so called scientists who disagree with the ToE are NOT on topic here.
If Q wants to defend an obviously overstuffed list then it should be taken elsewhere. Small suspensions to anyone carrying on with this.
Edited by AdminNosy, : correct author

AdminNosy
Administrator
Posts: 4754
From: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Joined: 11-11-2003


Message 236 of 304 (426549)
10-07-2007 1:06 PM
Reply to: Message 233 by IamJoseph
10-07-2007 12:07 PM


Definition of Speech
You will not bring up a concept for which you have no ability to define. You use the term bugubleblab (but spell it speech) without being able to articulate what it is. In fact you now say it can't be defined.
There for you will not bring it up again! You may go back to your speech thread and define your terms. Until you do that you will not clutter up other theads ith bugubleblab.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 233 by IamJoseph, posted 10-07-2007 12:07 PM IamJoseph has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 241 by IamJoseph, posted 10-07-2007 9:41 PM AdminNosy has replied

AdminNosy
Administrator
Posts: 4754
From: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Joined: 11-11-2003


Message 245 of 304 (426621)
10-08-2007 1:02 AM
Reply to: Message 241 by IamJoseph
10-07-2007 9:41 PM


24 hours IaJ
This isn't the speech thread. You haven't defined it yet. You are not allowed to mention bugableblab until you have defined it in the appropriate thread.
I'm giving you 24 hours to think about it.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 241 by IamJoseph, posted 10-07-2007 9:41 PM IamJoseph has not replied

AdminNosy
Administrator
Posts: 4754
From: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Joined: 11-11-2003


Message 254 of 304 (427243)
10-10-2007 3:41 PM
Reply to: Message 253 by bernerbits
10-10-2007 1:32 PM


Topic!!
bernerbits, the topic here is NOT human speech. Please avoid encouraging topic diversions. Thanks.
I know you are new here. It is very hard not to chase the red herrings all over the place. We all get trapped by that.
It is possible to earn short suspensions if you do so.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 253 by bernerbits, posted 10-10-2007 1:32 PM bernerbits has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 255 by bernerbits, posted 10-10-2007 4:07 PM AdminNosy has not replied

AdminNosy
Administrator
Posts: 4754
From: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Joined: 11-11-2003


Message 303 of 304 (440882)
12-15-2007 1:54 AM
Reply to: Message 302 by RAZD
12-15-2007 1:51 AM


Ok back to the actual topic now please.
No more off track discussion please.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 302 by RAZD, posted 12-15-2007 1:51 AM RAZD has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024