Why Are Christians Afraid To Doubt?

Am I to understand you invented a straw man Christianity in order to dispute what I said, and then decided to convert to it in order to conform to the rules? Puh-leeze!Well, you got me to smile. Gotta split.

Either way, the premise that we can rely on answers because we used logic to obtain them is clearly falsified. Knowledge obtained in this way is very much subject to error."Logic is not a tool which can guarantee perfect results". Would that be a better way to put it?And lest we think logic is perfect, where did we get it? Was the source subject to error?

I confess there is no evidence which circular reasoning cannot reject. End of discussion. Fine. Have you any plausible scenario by which the martyrs who testified to the resurrection of Jesus were deceived? If so, you're welcome to submit it. If not, please say so. My observations give me no evidence with which I might honestly dispute this statement.

I think what crashfrog proposes is that if a liar managed to infiltrate a Christian church, it invalidates Christian beliefs. Or if a liar wrote a fake Bible, it invalidates the true Bible. Or if a liar merely formed his own belief system, and called himself a Christian.Maybe it would take more than one. Maybe a handful. I was trying to help clarify the situation; but I guess we'll have to wait for crashfrog to give us a logical number. And maybe some reasoning to back up this contention.