You have just posited an 'absolute morality'. And your absolute is relative.
No Rob, he did not.
Nor has he said that Absolutes do not exist. Only fools like Ravi use such a silly argument as your's (but I imagine even Ravi knows how silly an argument it is, he just also knows that the folk he markets to will buy it without even thinking about it).
As you said, morality exists or it does not. It cannot be both absolute and relative. Why is this so hard for some of you?
Sorry charley but just more jabberwocky. An apple exists or does not exist, but it's color will be relative to its stage of maturity, its variety and the part observed.
Morality may well absolutely exist and still be relative.
AbE:
Nor as usual, does anything in your post have any relevance or relation to the question being asked.
The search to determine whether M-Theory and String theory etc are valid scientific theories also has absolutely nothing to do with morality. Your posts once again try to change the subject to irrelevant issues simply to disrupt learning and keep folk in ignorance.
Edited by jar, : add relevancy issue
Aslan is not a
Tame Lion