Is "Goddidit" an already presumed option in evc debate topics?

An offtopic question from
Abiogenesis
Message 60 by jar
So, jar was stating that abiogenesis was THE only option for the first life to come by. I replied to jar saying that first life could have always come by a supernatural act of creation.
The problem is that I knew that he already knew that, and already knew what his next reply would be like (above^). Which was, that presuming god did the first life would give science no new information or anything to work on.
I knew that already, but just wanted to point out that there is always the possibility of the supernatural.So, I (or anyone else) shouldn't need to make that remark that god is the second option when dealing with issues like this just to go over this futile conversation over again and sometimes dragging the whole topic off point.So... To stop these useless reminders, is "goddidit" always an already presumed option when discussing evolution related topics?I know I probably misrepresented jar in some ways, so an apology in advance PS.
(I'm sensing a lot of pink unicorn replies)Edited by Neutralmind, : No reason given.Edited by Neutralmind, : No reason given.

Thread copied to the Is "Goddidit" an already presumed option in evc debate topics? thread in the Miscellaneous Topics in Creation/Evolution forum, this copy of the thread has been closed.