Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,426 Year: 3,683/9,624 Month: 554/974 Week: 167/276 Day: 7/34 Hour: 1/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   A personal morality
New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 167 of 196 (394107)
04-09-2007 4:33 PM
Reply to: Message 166 by Stile
04-09-2007 4:16 PM


Re: Talkin' 'bout my morality...
-obviously, your feeling of yourself (your conscience) will keep you from doing this thing.
That's the point though, when my conscience alone is not enough. If I realized that some behavior was immoral but did it anyways.
You don't always have to listen to your conscience.
At that point you can still turn to God.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 166 by Stile, posted 04-09-2007 4:16 PM Stile has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 169 by Stile, posted 04-09-2007 5:24 PM New Cat's Eye has replied

  
New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 171 of 196 (394232)
04-10-2007 11:56 AM
Reply to: Message 168 by ringo
04-09-2007 4:37 PM


Re: Talkin' 'bout my morality...
What if your conscience was having an "allergic reaction"?
Its a possibility, but I don't know how I would be able to tell.
Long question short: Can you trust your conscience?
I think I can. How can anyone know?
If nobody is hurt, how do you know an action is "wrong"?
I guess you have to trust your conscience.
If I tell a lie and nobody knows its false and nobody gets hurt, I would still consider it immoral.
If I'm defending myself, and the other guy does get hurt, I wouldn't neccessarily consider it immoral.
Somebody getting hurt is not enough info to determine if it is moral or not. You have to go with your gut, I guess. Or society.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 168 by ringo, posted 04-09-2007 4:37 PM ringo has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 174 by ringo, posted 04-10-2007 12:47 PM New Cat's Eye has not replied

  
New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 172 of 196 (394233)
04-10-2007 12:09 PM
Reply to: Message 170 by crashfrog
04-09-2007 7:34 PM


Re: Talkin' 'bout my morality...
Why does your conscience say they're immoral?
I don't know.
Its more of a pass/fail response, it doesn't give an explanation.
Why are they bad just because it goes against your conscience?
That's how I tell if things are bad.
Isn't it possible that your "conscience" is just your internalized tendency to conform to the moral standards of your community? (I would say that the Milgram experiment definitely suggests that it is.)
Its more of a possibility, it probably is.

But let me get back to the atheist = more immorality thing. I think its best to give an example here.
The last time I got into a bar fight, it was both of our faults and we both wanted to fight. Now, before the fight, my fists clinched up, my heart sped up, I started feeling more like an animal. I started feeling farther away from god. When I feel like that, and think about god, I realize that I should stop and think about what I'm doing and how it isn't the right thing to do. Its that seperation from god that makes me feel like I'm sinning and makes me think that my action was wrong. I should try to avoid fighting. But, the last time, I did fight. I didn't think about god and I wanted to fight. Now, without god, I don't think that I was behaving immorally. He wanted to fight, I wanted to fight, let's get it on. But with god, I do think I was behaving immorally as I was seperating myself from him. My conscience told me that I was wrong and that I shouldn't have fought. But when I think about the situation as if I was an atheist, I don't see anything wrong with it. If I didn't believe in god, I would have gotten into more fights.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 170 by crashfrog, posted 04-09-2007 7:34 PM crashfrog has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 175 by crashfrog, posted 04-11-2007 11:15 AM New Cat's Eye has not replied
 Message 176 by nator, posted 04-11-2007 6:00 PM New Cat's Eye has replied

  
New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 173 of 196 (394235)
04-10-2007 12:18 PM
Reply to: Message 169 by Stile
04-09-2007 5:24 PM


Re: Talkin' 'bout my morality...
Fair enough. I think we've gotten as far as we can go in our conversation
I doubt that
My point is only that God is not needed for Morality. As in, God is not needed for all Morality.
I'd change that to belief in God is not needed for Morality. But that is just my opinion, because without god, we are amoral beasts.
If your point is that you personally need God in order to behave morally. Then I accept your point.
My point wasn't that I need god to behave morally, it was that without my belief in god, I would behave more immorally.
No, you don't always have to listen to your conscience. My entire point, however, is that moral people do just that.
Yes, but what if their conscience is wrong and they are actually NOT behaving morally.... just like visa versa.
In any case, thanks again CS for discussing things with me.
No problem, I like you.
If nothing else, it helps me write out and further understand my own thoughts and feelings.
No, there's something else too.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 169 by Stile, posted 04-09-2007 5:24 PM Stile has seen this message but not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 177 by nator, posted 04-11-2007 6:10 PM New Cat's Eye has replied

  
New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 178 of 196 (394821)
04-13-2007 11:13 AM
Reply to: Message 177 by nator
04-11-2007 6:10 PM


Re: Talkin' 'bout my morality...
When people have damage to the ventromedial prefrontal cortex of the brain, they become sociopaths.
This part of the brain, just like every other part of the brain, evolved, and it doesn't take a huge leap to understand how the ability to empathise with and feel remorse for hurting others would be adaptive in a social species.
A physical explanation for a phenomenon does not preclude god's involvement.
Without God, then, we would still have a conscience and wouldn't be amoral beasts.
A fine opinion, but I disagree.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 177 by nator, posted 04-11-2007 6:10 PM nator has not replied

  
New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 179 of 196 (394826)
04-13-2007 11:43 AM
Reply to: Message 176 by nator
04-11-2007 6:00 PM


Re: Talkin' 'bout my morality...
None of the unbelievers I know personally have ever been in a bar fight.
That must be because being a believer makes you fight
It just isn't something that grown ups in my world do.
Well, they do in southern Illinois.
That "feeling" you talk about having, that voice that you hear that says "This is a bad idea, you shouldn't be doing this even though you want to right now"; everybody (who isn't a sociopath) has that voice inside of them. That is your conscience.
Some people attibute it to God, others don't.
I know what my conscience is. I don't attribute it to god alone.
When my conscience isn't getting the job done, I can turn to god to pick up the slack.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 176 by nator, posted 04-11-2007 6:00 PM nator has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 180 by nator, posted 04-13-2007 9:51 PM New Cat's Eye has replied

  
New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 181 of 196 (395188)
04-15-2007 1:37 PM
Reply to: Message 180 by nator
04-13-2007 9:51 PM


Re: Talkin' 'bout my morality...
You, a believer, an educated professional, and an adult, are claiming that morality comes from God, and you rely on God to tell you that getting into bar fights is wrong when your conscience fails you.
You've misunderstood me.
Its not that I need god to tell me that getting into bar fights is wrong, its that god helps in preventing me from doing something that I know is wrong.
quote:
When my conscience isn't getting the job done, I can turn to god to pick up the slack.
That's still your conscience.
Some people attribute it (or in your case, a part of it) to God (or their long-dead Grandmother, or someone else they wouldn't want to disappoint), but everybody has it.
I don't think its my conscience. Of course everybody has it. Even though everybody has it, that doesn't mean it isn't from god. If it was from god, unbelievers would still have it even though they don't believe in him.

None of the unbelievers I know get into bar fights, nor have they engaged in violence since they were immature children.
I guess that's just more evidense that believing makes you get into bar fights
And they're gonna be fucked when they actually need to use violence.
Bar fighting is all culture. It doesn't matter if you're a believer or mature.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 180 by nator, posted 04-13-2007 9:51 PM nator has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 182 by ringo, posted 04-15-2007 2:11 PM New Cat's Eye has replied
 Message 183 by nator, posted 04-16-2007 8:16 AM New Cat's Eye has replied

  
New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 184 of 196 (395393)
04-16-2007 10:24 AM
Reply to: Message 182 by ringo
04-15-2007 2:11 PM


Re: Talkin' 'bout my morality...
Catholic Scientist writes:
Bar fighting is all culture. It doesn't matter if you're a believer or mature.
So culture trumps belief. If you were born into a Buddhist culture, you'd be a Buddhist. If you were born into an atheist culture, you'd be an atheist.
Doesn't that suggest that your morality is not belief-based?
Sure, from the get-go. But if you go and change your beliefs, it would affect your morality.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 182 by ringo, posted 04-15-2007 2:11 PM ringo has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 186 by ringo, posted 04-16-2007 11:04 AM New Cat's Eye has replied

  
New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 185 of 196 (395395)
04-16-2007 10:48 AM
Reply to: Message 183 by nator
04-16-2007 8:16 AM


Re: Talkin' 'bout my morality...
But then you are merely dismissing the evidence from neuroscience regarding the role of the ventromedial frontal cortex in producing the conscience.
No, I was typing about something other than my conscience.
To follow your lead, it means that God's ability to instill morality and a conscience in people can be stymied by a brain injury.
Not necessarily.
Why must you always twist and turn what I'm saying?
It is so annoying.
See, here's what my non-God, brain-based, unbeliever morality tells me about that.
We're not even talking about the same thing.
then you don't go to the bars where the fights happen
Wow, that's just brilliant
Not only are we not on the same page, we're not even in the same book.

See, to me, part of growing up is learning how to deal with people and situations without resorting to violence.
Bad people look for people like you to prey upon.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 183 by nator, posted 04-16-2007 8:16 AM nator has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 187 by nator, posted 04-16-2007 11:45 AM New Cat's Eye has replied

  
New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 188 of 196 (395422)
04-16-2007 1:32 PM
Reply to: Message 186 by ringo
04-16-2007 11:04 AM


Re: Talkin' 'bout my morality...
But if you go and change your beliefs, it would affect your morality.
So you keep saying, but how?
I don't see what the problem is, I mean, how wouldn't it?
If your beliefs on what is moral changes, certainly your morality would change. If your source for guidelines on morality changed (i.e religion) then your morality would change.
If your morality is not belief-based, how can changing your beliefs change your morality?
Changing your beliefs can affect how much influence your culture has.
If your feet hurt, how can changing your tie relieve the pain?
If it weighs less

This message is a reply to:
 Message 186 by ringo, posted 04-16-2007 11:04 AM ringo has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 190 by ringo, posted 04-16-2007 1:51 PM New Cat's Eye has replied

  
New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 189 of 196 (395426)
04-16-2007 1:44 PM
Reply to: Message 187 by nator
04-16-2007 11:45 AM


Re: Talkin' 'bout my morality...
Your assertions don't constitute a real argument in favor of the existence of anything beyond a brain-based conscience.
Oh well.
Well, actually, yes, this is the logical conclusion of what you are claiming.
Only with your faulty premises.
It is not "twisting" what you are saying to apply your claims to the issue and follow where they lead.
Your error is that your not following my claims. You twist and then follow.
Aren't you claiming that at least some of what we call the human conscience is NOT produced in the brain and is instilled in us by God?If what you say is true, it shouldn't be possible to remove this God-given conscience through damage to the brain, right?
Wrong. That's not what I'm saying.
I'll tell you what, any time you end a sentence with ",right?" or ",no?", you're probably wrong about what I'm saying.

I don't have time right now to give you the detailed explanation you need for what I thought was a fairly simple concept to understand.
And given your intentions for only twisting what I'm trying to say, it will be pretty low on my "To Do" list.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 187 by nator, posted 04-16-2007 11:45 AM nator has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 193 by nator, posted 04-16-2007 4:58 PM New Cat's Eye has not replied

  
New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 191 of 196 (395451)
04-16-2007 3:33 PM
Reply to: Message 190 by ringo
04-16-2007 1:51 PM


You've agreed that we learn our morality from the culture we are born into.
So?, That's how it starts. It doesn't mean that it can't change afterwards. You think your morality is unchangeable?
Changing your religion (or changing to atheism) doesn't change what was trained into you at an early age.
It doesn't change what was trained but it could change what training you dismiss, or what addition training you accept.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 190 by ringo, posted 04-16-2007 1:51 PM ringo has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 192 by ringo, posted 04-16-2007 4:04 PM New Cat's Eye has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024