Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,784 Year: 4,041/9,624 Month: 912/974 Week: 239/286 Day: 46/109 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Intelligent Design (ID) Creationist(s) - (Michael Behe, the prime example)
Archer Opteryx
Member (Idle past 3624 days)
Posts: 1811
From: East Asia
Joined: 08-16-2006


Message 20 of 47 (396276)
04-19-2007 1:44 PM
Reply to: Message 19 by Rob
04-19-2007 10:22 AM


Re: 'Stand firm' indeed
Rob:
Reminds me of the story I heard yesturday about Alexander Solzhenitsyn.
He was forced into a concentration camp by Stalin for daring to question and critique the system.
Here we go again.
Most people see a difference between a free exchange of ideas and imprisonment in a Soviet gulag. But not Rob. In the weird Parallel Universe of Rob, it's the apex of torture to have people actually disagree with you in a forum you voluntarily joined in search of a debate.
To hear Rob tell it, criticism of any view he espouses--no matter how badly reasoned or stated the view may be even by his own admission--is injustice on a par with imprisonment in a Soviet gulag, stoning in a Middle Eastern courtyard, and dismemberment in the Circus Maximus.
Somehow, I doubt the real victims of persecutions would see it this way. A real martyr would likely think Rob and other message board whiners have it pretty easy.
Imagine sadistic Roman guards offering victims strapped to a stake as lions bear down on them a choice of sufferings. The guards tell their hapless victims that instead of this present predicament they may instead endure the unimaginable suffering of being disagreed with on an Internet forum. How long do you think these poor people would agonize over that nightmarish dilemma?
My guess is that most would snap up the offer on the spot.
Rob: if you want to know about real persecution, move to China or North Korea. I am not kidding. It is entirely possible to arrange this. People in those places are enduring real censorship and face serious consequences for themselves and their families for any kind of dissent. If you want to buck up the morale of a comrade, you can get yourself into prisons there (it's easy to do) where any cheer you can offer would be welcome to your unjustly abused cell mates. If you intend to congratulate yourself on your sufferings, those are excellent places to begin earning the right.
Until you've done that, cut the whining. You operate in a free society where views may be openly expressed. You benefit from this freedom every day--then complain about the very plurality of views it allows as if it were repression. What a crock.
You're no martyr. You're just spoiled.
Grow up.
_
Edited by Archer Opterix, : html.

Archer
All species are transitional.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 19 by Rob, posted 04-19-2007 10:22 AM Rob has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 21 by Rob, posted 04-19-2007 2:10 PM Archer Opteryx has replied

  
Archer Opteryx
Member (Idle past 3624 days)
Posts: 1811
From: East Asia
Joined: 08-16-2006


Message 22 of 47 (396318)
04-19-2007 4:06 PM
Reply to: Message 21 by Rob
04-19-2007 2:10 PM


Re: Debate, Acronyms, etc.
the fact is that there is a connection between physical persecution and cover up, and intellectual persecution and cover up.
No doubt about it, Rob.
Open debate is not a cover-up, though. Anything can emerge. That's the thing about it that bugs you.
Of course, it's also the thing about it you want to exploit.
It's no secret that pain sometimes results from open debate. That's why a certain decorum is called for to keep an open society functioning. Even so, most people in the world will gladly opt for the pains of freedom over the pains of oppression.
Just be accurate, if you must discuss it, about the kind of pain you are enduring. It's a free-society pain. You are not in a gulag. You are not in the company of those who are daily arrested or executed for what you believe. I hope you never are; no one should have to endure that. Out of respect for those who do endure it, though, if nothing else, please quit equating message-board annoyances to that level of sacrifice.
Sorry about my level of passion in the last post. As you can imagine, these are not abstract matters in my neighbourhood.
Ok...so you don't want to hear it from me...
If an idea is worthwhile I don't much care where it comes from. If an idea is dumb I don't much care where it comes from, either.
It is nice to see a Rob thought coming from Rob himself, though, rather than being lobbed over a wall covered with literary scraps. You've made some noticeable changes lately in that department. The change in style couldn't have been easy but it makes a big difference.
Back to Buz, as you say.
For my part I don't see why Buz can't choose his own acronym. There's YEC, there's OEC, there's ID. There can well be more. For me it just testifies to the growing diversity (fragmentation?) of anti-evolution belief. Biblical literalists, under environmental stress as a species since the 1870s, are searching for the mutation that will ensure the survival of the fundamentalist genome.
Still, Ringo and others have a point from the scientific perspective about the Y. Saying 'I'm a YCC not a YEC' is not the abracadabra to get Buz out of science problems. He's still denying vast body of science knowledge.
_

This message is a reply to:
 Message 21 by Rob, posted 04-19-2007 2:10 PM Rob has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 24 by Rob, posted 04-19-2007 6:42 PM Archer Opteryx has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024