Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9162 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 915,817 Year: 3,074/9,624 Month: 919/1,588 Week: 102/223 Day: 13/17 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Intelligent Design (ID) Creationist(s) - (Michael Behe, the prime example)
DrJones*
Member
Posts: 2284
From: Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Joined: 08-19-2004
Member Rating: 6.8


Message 39 of 47 (397665)
04-27-2007 1:04 AM
Reply to: Message 37 by Buzsaw
04-26-2007 7:27 PM


Re: Some blurbs from the Discovery Institute
For one thing I can argue empirically that my hypothesis satisfies 1LoT if it is true.
Great please provide the empirical evidence for "god" as it is described in yoru hypothesis.

Just a monkey in a long line of kings.
If "elitist" just means "not the dumbest motherfucker in the room", I'll be an elitist!
*not an actual doctor

This message is a reply to:
 Message 37 by Buzsaw, posted 04-26-2007 7:27 PM Buzsaw has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 40 by Buzsaw, posted 04-27-2007 9:58 AM DrJones* has replied

  
DrJones*
Member
Posts: 2284
From: Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Joined: 08-19-2004
Member Rating: 6.8


Message 41 of 47 (397740)
04-27-2007 3:24 PM
Reply to: Message 40 by Buzsaw
04-27-2007 9:58 AM


Re: Empirical Data
My claim is that my eternal universe hypothesis is empirically 1LoT compatable as stated if true.
You keep saying that word. I do not think it means what you think it means. What experiments have you done to determine that your hypothesis is compatible with the first law of thermodynamics?

Just a monkey in a long line of kings.
If "elitist" just means "not the dumbest motherfucker in the room", I'll be an elitist!
*not an actual doctor

This message is a reply to:
 Message 40 by Buzsaw, posted 04-27-2007 9:58 AM Buzsaw has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 42 by Buzsaw, posted 04-27-2007 10:17 PM DrJones* has replied

  
DrJones*
Member
Posts: 2284
From: Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Joined: 08-19-2004
Member Rating: 6.8


Message 43 of 47 (397845)
04-27-2007 11:01 PM
Reply to: Message 42 by Buzsaw
04-27-2007 10:17 PM


Re: Empirical Data
Please understand that I'm not claiming my hypothesis to be empirical.
really? then why did you say:
My claim is that my eternal universe hypothesis is empirically 1LoT compatable as stated if true.
why do you need testing outside of 1LoT to determine whether it is compatible with that science law?
when you say:
My claim is that my eternal universe hypothesis is empirically 1LoT compatable as stated if true.
you're saying that you have experimental data that shows that your hypothesis is compatible with the first law of thermo.
You people are bankrupt as to any explanation of where all the energy originated from.
And you are as equally bankrupt when it comes to where your "god" comes from. You sweep it all under the rug with the answer "he's always existed".
to addess your edit:
What I am claiming to be empirical is that my ID/energy hypothesis passes the 1LoT test.
what experiments ahve you done to show that your hypothesis passes the test? To dumb it down for you empirical=experimental, if you're claiming that your hypothesis is somehow empirically sound it means that you have experimental data to back it up.
Edited by DrJones*, : No reason given.
Edited by DrJones*, : No reason given.
Edited by DrJones*, : No reason given.

Just a monkey in a long line of kings.
If "elitist" just means "not the dumbest motherfucker in the room", I'll be an elitist!
*not an actual doctor

This message is a reply to:
 Message 42 by Buzsaw, posted 04-27-2007 10:17 PM Buzsaw has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024