Seems to me you are try to say that there are unatural things in existance. If this is so, would you care to point them out? I can't think of one unatural thing.
As for evil:
Evil is what ever you call it. What is evil from your point of view is not from mine. I concider filling childrens heads with religious nonsense evil, I bet you don't.
Seeing as we can't agree on what evil is
in the real concrete world we can conclude it exist only as a subjective point of reference.
As for faults or imbalances:
These are differences: nothing more, nothing less. We may find them acceptable or not
according to our belieifs about reality.
Rob writes:
Under your own philosophy, we have no basis upon which to judge Mr. Cho (or president Bush)other than some illusory perception created by our society (which itself is also perfectly natural).
This is correct appart from the bit about
illusory percpetion.
Rob writes:
There is no such thing as truth, and no such thing as a lie. You are Bush, and Bush is me, and I am a rock, and Hoot Mon is litterally an owl.
This is of course, bollocks.
Rob writes:
Razd, according to your own philosophy... conceit is perfectly natural. Yet... you imply fault or imbalance is contained therein.
Razd is correct, conciet is natural to human beings. Again however fault or imbalance is simply words used to desribe a sense of valance attatched to the character trait 'conceit'.