Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9162 total)
1 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 915,806 Year: 3,063/9,624 Month: 908/1,588 Week: 91/223 Day: 2/17 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   true religion
crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1466 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003


Message 25 of 84 (39872)
05-12-2003 10:35 PM
Reply to: Message 23 by mike the wiz
05-12-2003 10:26 PM


(ending replies here as i am sick of people coming back to me on this ,
If you don't want people to talk about your beliefs why do you voice them so publicly? If your faith can't survive a couple of questions best you keep it to yourself.
if i dont believe in trucks it doesn't mean one wont hit me if i walk on to a motorway ,
Interesting - so, you think that belief and faith might not be the best way to determine the way things really are and what our place in this world might be? Funny, that's what we've been saying all along.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 23 by mike the wiz, posted 05-12-2003 10:26 PM mike the wiz has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 27 by mike the wiz, posted 05-13-2003 5:18 PM crashfrog has replied

crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1466 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003


Message 28 of 84 (39973)
05-13-2003 5:26 PM
Reply to: Message 27 by mike the wiz
05-13-2003 5:18 PM


i dont recall saying my faith hasn't survived a topic,can you show me where i said this?
Then why withdraw? The way you're backing out of all your debates on this thread and others makes it seem like you're afraid to argue or something. It's like you're sticking your fingers in your ears and saying "I can't hear you!"
That's not a position suggestive of intellectual honesty. Consider the example of Truthlover, who (in my opinion) is as intellectually honest a person of faith as anyone is likely to come across. Does he say stuff like "I'm tired of evos arguing with me?" No. When he doesn't have an answer, he says so. That's honesty.
It looks like you're just retreating from questions you can't answer because you're afraid that if you don't have the answer it says something about your faith. To the contrary. If you don't have answers, no one's going to think worse of you or your faith if you just say so.
Take the last word, if that's important to you - but think about what I've said.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 27 by mike the wiz, posted 05-13-2003 5:18 PM mike the wiz has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 29 by mike the wiz, posted 05-13-2003 5:36 PM crashfrog has not replied

crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1466 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003


Message 35 of 84 (40319)
05-15-2003 8:43 PM
Reply to: Message 34 by mike the wiz
05-15-2003 8:10 PM


i did not make the bible up , it says everything in it is true and can you disprove it?
That's a great question for Rrhain! Since he's so certain that negatives can be proved, I'd like to see him tackle this one.
Now, me, I'd say that since Mike is making the positive claim ("the bible is true") it's up to him to support it. Otherwise we'd just yell "Prove it is!" "No, you prove it isn't!" back and forth.
Anyway, why would you use evidence from the bible to confirm the bible itself? That's circular reasoning - assuming what you are trying to prove.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 34 by mike the wiz, posted 05-15-2003 8:10 PM mike the wiz has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 36 by John, posted 05-16-2003 12:03 AM crashfrog has not replied
 Message 71 by Rrhain, posted 05-22-2003 6:33 AM crashfrog has not replied

crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1466 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003


Message 39 of 84 (40443)
05-16-2003 3:50 PM
Reply to: Message 38 by mike the wiz
05-16-2003 2:20 PM


all i was saying is that the word of God is not a fantasy.
Right, but it's indistinguishable from one. Like all special revalation, third parties can't tell the difference between somebody recieving private messages from god and somebody who's lying about it.
For all you know the bible is a work of fiction that people mistakenly believe. I would point out that (especially at the time the bible was written) there's significant financial reward for starting religions, especially ones that tell you to donate all your worldly goods to the church or you won't get into heaven.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 38 by mike the wiz, posted 05-16-2003 2:20 PM mike the wiz has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 40 by Dan Carroll, posted 05-16-2003 3:54 PM crashfrog has not replied
 Message 41 by Mister Pamboli, posted 05-16-2003 4:44 PM crashfrog has not replied

crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1466 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003


Message 50 of 84 (40703)
05-19-2003 9:31 PM
Reply to: Message 49 by mike the wiz
05-19-2003 9:18 PM


because God has always existed for me i cannot remember a certain time i didnt believe, i kind of always believed even by my own choice. (was not brain washed).
That doesn't even begin to answer the question. The question is, why must faith in God equate to a literal reading of the bible? Especially in the face of evidence (internal and external) against such a reading?
Plenty of people have faith in god but accept the findings of science. (I'm not one of them, but there are plenty.)
only God has only ever shown me what fully matters -his love for us,Jesus and having faith in him,which essentially is my point
Again, why does that have to mean creationism to you? I for one am curious.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 49 by mike the wiz, posted 05-19-2003 9:18 PM mike the wiz has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 53 by mike the wiz, posted 05-20-2003 10:31 AM crashfrog has replied

crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1466 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003


Message 56 of 84 (40771)
05-20-2003 2:45 PM
Reply to: Message 53 by mike the wiz
05-20-2003 10:31 AM


but the arguement was why have faith in God,
Schraf's question, if I read it right, asked you why faith in God has to mean faith in a literal reading of the bible. For many reasonable, faithful people, it doesn't. I'm just curious how you defend the literal interpretation.
because one man brought sin into the world and one man took it out therefore genesis is the foundation of my faith and creation.
Sure, but does it have to be literally, historically true to have that significance? I can appreciate that that's the foundation of your faith but it doesn't have to be a literal narrative to be the case. It could simply be a parable. It's possible for a story to express a truth without itself being literally true.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 53 by mike the wiz, posted 05-20-2003 10:31 AM mike the wiz has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 57 by mike the wiz, posted 05-20-2003 5:13 PM crashfrog has replied

crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1466 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003


Message 65 of 84 (40816)
05-20-2003 7:14 PM
Reply to: Message 57 by mike the wiz
05-20-2003 5:13 PM


there is no real reason to dismiss it as myth (genesis)even if there is an evolution theory.
A myth is not the same as a lie. The genesis story can be true in what it tells us about the relationship of God and humans - as well as the relationship between a man and a woman - without being a literal account.
The thing is, if it's a literal account, if you actually believe that the Genesis stories REALLY happened, you must admit that they would have left significant evidence for their occurance? Things that really happen tend to leave evidence that they happened.
This is not the case for the Genesis stories. There's significant evidence that they do not represent true historical narratives. Even in the text itself. (If I tell you a story that starts with "once upon a time", everyone who hears it knows that story didn't really happen. There are elements in the story of genesis that are the same kind of indicators.)
There's no reason you can't accept the truth of the thesis of the Genesis story (the need for man's redemption) but not the truth of the events described actually happening.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 57 by mike the wiz, posted 05-20-2003 5:13 PM mike the wiz has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 66 by truthlover, posted 05-20-2003 7:31 PM crashfrog has replied

crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1466 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003


Message 67 of 84 (40821)
05-20-2003 7:50 PM
Reply to: Message 66 by truthlover
05-20-2003 7:31 PM


The seven-day creation week, for one thing. Seven is a number often used in classical literature to suggest mysticism, or an innumerable amount. (This appears in other places in the bible. In the Oddessy, Odysseus spends "seven years" in a place when the story of what happens in that place is clearly fantastic. In parts of the narrative that are more realistic, he spends more normal amounts of time. Clearly the use of the number 7 is to suggest a mystic dimension to his stay at that place.)
The number 7 also appears in the story of Cain and Abel, when god marks Cain and commands that if any slay him, his punishment will be "sevenfold". God's not just doing math, here; he's suggesting that the punishment for killing Cain will be innumerably stronger.
There's much repetition of phrases, like "And it was so." Repetition is often used in myth to highlight a natural order to things.
To the modern reader these aren't as clear as "once upon a time", but to readers of antiquity they would have been clear indicators that they weren't reading history, but myth. Anyway these are just the few I could come up with on a cursory examination, a deeper study could uncover much more.
An interesting note: my fiance is working on her thesis, a look at matriarchal remnants in Russian folktales. She tells me that Russian folktales tend to end, not with "and they lived happily ever after", but something like "and I have been to their home where I drank their beer, but not a drop of it passed my lips." Simultaneously asserting the fictional veracity of the tale and the speaker's sobriety.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 66 by truthlover, posted 05-20-2003 7:31 PM truthlover has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024