Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,760 Year: 4,017/9,624 Month: 888/974 Week: 215/286 Day: 22/109 Hour: 3/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Logic and Empiricism
New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 7 of 55 (398730)
05-02-2007 11:37 AM
Reply to: Message 6 by Nuggin
05-02-2007 11:25 AM


Re: Oops
There is no room for "faith" and "reasoning" in the same equation
Not neccessarily, but usually.
If someone had faith in two mutually exclusive things, they could use reasoning to realize that they must be mistaken somewhere.
as faith is "belief without evidence" and reasoning is dependant on examining the evidence.
Do you mean strictly objective evidence? I don't think evidence has the same meaning in both parts of your statement.
I agree that faith is belief without objective evidence but I don't think reasoning is dependent on only objective evidense. You can reason through hypothetical situations n'such. I'm thinking philosophy here... Lacking objective evidence doesn't mean you can't reason about something.
Also, people have reasons for their beliefs. Thier reasons are their evidence, it just that the evidence is not objective. So some might not consider it evidence at all. If that is the case, then reasoning is not dependent on "evidence" as in objective only evidence.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 6 by Nuggin, posted 05-02-2007 11:25 AM Nuggin has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 8 by crashfrog, posted 05-02-2007 11:42 AM New Cat's Eye has replied
 Message 55 by DominionSeraph, posted 09-08-2007 10:59 PM New Cat's Eye has not replied

  
New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 9 of 55 (398745)
05-02-2007 12:52 PM
Reply to: Message 8 by crashfrog
05-02-2007 11:42 AM


Re: Oops
Who says you can't have faith in two mutually exclusive things?
No, I guess you could. Technically, you could have faith in anything.
I wasn't trying to say that you couldn't.
It was counter to the claim:
Nuggin writes:
There is no room for "faith" and "reasoning" in the same equation
I was trying to come up with an example of how someone could use reasoning on faith, not make a claim about what people can have faith in. I prolly shouldn't have used the word "must".

This message is a reply to:
 Message 8 by crashfrog, posted 05-02-2007 11:42 AM crashfrog has not replied

  
New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 15 of 55 (398779)
05-02-2007 2:55 PM
Reply to: Message 11 by Nuggin
05-02-2007 1:52 PM


Re: Oops
You obviously don't know what faith is...

This message is a reply to:
 Message 11 by Nuggin, posted 05-02-2007 1:52 PM Nuggin has not replied

  
New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 22 of 55 (398980)
05-03-2007 10:04 AM
Reply to: Message 19 by Nuggin
05-02-2007 3:37 PM


Re: Oops
I see what you are saying, but I think we've spun off of my oringal point with is that
"Faith + Logic = scripture" is incorrect.
But if your reason for it being incorrect was wrong, wouldn't that suggest that it might not be incorrect?
I think that it is correct. You have some things that are of faith, that when you apply reasoning/logic to them, you get a set of beliefs, or 'scripture'.
I think that upthread jon was saying that 'scripture' means belief or that's what he meant, at least.
Now, I agree that you don't need the logic, but that doesn't make the statement incorrect.
Look at it this way:
liquid + heat = gas
Your argument is that heat is not required to go from liquid to gas (which is true because you could lower pressure) so the statement is incorrect. But you're wrong. The statement is correct, it just isn't the be-all end-all.
Make sense?
So can you admit that it is not incorrect now?
You should know that faith and reasoning can go hand in hand, and that they don't have to exclude each other.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 19 by Nuggin, posted 05-02-2007 3:37 PM Nuggin has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024