I see what you are saying, but I think we've spun off of my oringal point with is that
"Faith + Logic = scripture" is incorrect.
But if your reason for it being incorrect was wrong, wouldn't that suggest that it might not be incorrect?
I think that it is correct. You have some things that are of faith, that when you apply reasoning/logic to them, you get a set of beliefs, or 'scripture'.
I think that upthread jon was saying that 'scripture' means belief or that's what he meant, at least.
Now, I agree that you don't
need the logic, but that doesn't make the statement incorrect.
Look at it this way:
liquid + heat = gas
Your argument is that heat is not required to go from liquid to gas (which is true because you could lower pressure) so the statement is incorrect. But you're wrong. The statement is correct, it just isn't the be-all end-all.
Make sense?
So can you admit that it is not incorrect now?
You should know that faith and reasoning
can go hand in hand, and that they don't have to exclude each other.