Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,810 Year: 4,067/9,624 Month: 938/974 Week: 265/286 Day: 26/46 Hour: 1/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   for the record (re: guns thread)
ICANT
Member
Posts: 6769
From: SSC
Joined: 03-12-2007
Member Rating: 1.6


Message 145 of 305 (399628)
05-07-2007 1:36 AM
Reply to: Message 143 by Nuggin
05-06-2007 11:54 PM


Re-Gun Control
Wow. Just wow.
So if we banned guns in the USA that would solve our problem.
If so why did the reports in Britain show the 40% increase in crimes with guns in 4 years after handgun's were banned in 1997?
Page not found | National Review
Research by Jeff Miron at Boston University, examining homicide rates across 44 countries, found that countries with the strictest gun-control laws also tended to have the highest homicide rates. News reports in Britain showed how crimes with guns have risen 40 percent in the four years after handguns were banned in 1997. Police are extremely important in stopping crime, but almost always arrive on the scene after the crime occurs.

"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 143 by Nuggin, posted 05-06-2007 11:54 PM Nuggin has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 146 by Nuggin, posted 05-07-2007 2:05 AM ICANT has not replied
 Message 148 by nator, posted 05-07-2007 8:48 AM ICANT has not replied

ICANT
Member
Posts: 6769
From: SSC
Joined: 03-12-2007
Member Rating: 1.6


Message 223 of 305 (400056)
05-09-2007 11:54 PM


Re-Gun Control
nator writes:
It is quite difficult to beat or stab someone to death. It takes a long time.
There are thousands of people in the US that could kill you with their bare hands before you could pull a revolver from your purse and shoot them. Our armed forces teach people how to do this all the time.
Modulous writes:
Banning guns in the USA is far too late. I think the only sane solution would be to do as the Swiss do. Highly regulate the weapons
The US ranks 8th and Switzerland ranks 19th murders per capita with a gun.
Why is it that Jamaica with a handgun ban and only 1% of the people able to qualify to own a gun ranked 3rd behind only South Africa and Colombia in murders per capita.
Modulous writes:
As you admit later - restriction on 2nd ammendments rights are already a reality - so they are not impossible.
The Constitution grantees my rights to own and bear arms so that I can protect myself from my government and criminals of any type if it becomes necessary.
I don't know about the rest of you folks but they can have my guns when they pry them from my hands after I am dead.
BTW I have shot squirrels for food with my 22 pistol. When on the farm I used the 22 pistol to kill hogs on hog killing day. Single shot each animal. Weapons have many uses.

Replies to this message:
 Message 225 by Jon, posted 05-10-2007 12:57 AM ICANT has not replied
 Message 228 by Modulous, posted 05-10-2007 4:17 AM ICANT has not replied
 Message 230 by nator, posted 05-10-2007 8:19 AM ICANT has not replied

ICANT
Member
Posts: 6769
From: SSC
Joined: 03-12-2007
Member Rating: 1.6


Message 241 of 305 (400258)
05-11-2007 7:16 PM
Reply to: Message 233 by One_Charred_Wing
05-11-2007 12:36 AM


Re: Clarification
the gun can much more easily reach such a massive potential a lot faster. Jon? ICANT? Am I right on this?
Yes
Grenades and plastic even more massive potential.
Our forefathers fought (and many of them died) for freedom from government oppression, and because of that they put the 2nd amendment in the constitution.
Amendment 2 - Right to Bear Arms. Ratified 12/15/1791. Note
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
It does not say the Militia has the right. It says the People have the right.
The problem is how do you limit what arms a person is able to own without infringing on the rights of the people. The only legal way is to amend the constitution, which has to be ratified by 2/3 rds of the states.

"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 233 by One_Charred_Wing, posted 05-11-2007 12:36 AM One_Charred_Wing has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 242 by NosyNed, posted 05-11-2007 7:24 PM ICANT has not replied

ICANT
Member
Posts: 6769
From: SSC
Joined: 03-12-2007
Member Rating: 1.6


Message 244 of 305 (400263)
05-11-2007 7:53 PM
Reply to: Message 239 by Vacate
05-11-2007 5:41 PM


Re: Second Amendment
The second amendment may protect the possesion of firearms,
It does protect the possesion of arms. The only way to change it is a constitutional amendment. Requiring radification by 2/3 rd's of the states.
My weapon of choice is a bolt action springfield. You can get it in the mud, water, whatever. I can clean it in less than 2 minutes blindfolded. It is accurate at 500 yds to the point I can put 10 holes in a target at rapid fire that you can cover with your hand.
I would dare say there are hundreds of thousands of trained x military that can do the same. So don't sell the American People Short.

"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 239 by Vacate, posted 05-11-2007 5:41 PM Vacate has not replied

ICANT
Member
Posts: 6769
From: SSC
Joined: 03-12-2007
Member Rating: 1.6


Message 245 of 305 (400264)
05-11-2007 7:56 PM
Reply to: Message 243 by Jon
05-11-2007 7:32 PM


Re: freedom from oppression
The monarchy of the King of England. Unless he means religious dogma
I thought the church and state was the same then.

"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 243 by Jon, posted 05-11-2007 7:32 PM Jon has not replied

ICANT
Member
Posts: 6769
From: SSC
Joined: 03-12-2007
Member Rating: 1.6


Message 258 of 305 (400369)
05-12-2007 9:25 PM
Reply to: Message 250 by nator
05-11-2007 9:36 PM


Re: Misconceptions
So, is the yearly deaths of 30,000 people from guns (which includes homicide, suicide, and accidental shootings merely a misconception?
Actually 32,969 in 2003 last year I can find.
nator should we ban auto's?
http://www.iii.org/media/hottopics/insurance/test5/
In 2005, 43,443 people died in motor vehicle crashes and an additional 2,699,000 people were injured.
May 24, 2005 http://www.consumersunion.org/..._product_safety/002257.html
Three children killed each week in preventable auto-related deaths
As shown on this web site (e.g., see Table 1.2 of Death By Government), from 1900 through 1987 governments murdered near 170,000,000 people. With respect to this figure I am often asked how much of this occurred since the end of World War II in 1945. With the conclusion of that war and the discovery of the breadth and depth of the Holocaust, many demanded "Never Again." But our history since has rather been: "Again, again, again, and again."
From 1945 and up to 1987, about 76,000,000 people have been murdered in cold blood by one regime or another,
You can ban my automobile and take it away from me. But not my right to own and bear arms.
There is a lot of misconceptions about what a government can do when the citizens are unarmed.

"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 250 by nator, posted 05-11-2007 9:36 PM nator has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 269 by Nuggin, posted 05-13-2007 1:43 AM ICANT has replied

ICANT
Member
Posts: 6769
From: SSC
Joined: 03-12-2007
Member Rating: 1.6


Message 278 of 305 (400426)
05-13-2007 3:49 PM
Reply to: Message 274 by Jon
05-13-2007 1:32 PM


Re: Links and Statements
A landmine may make a big hole in the ground, but hey, if it kills off 56 invading Canadians
Jon as I remember landmines weren't that good at taking out human targets. It was ok for tanks and other vehicles.
A 30 cal or 60 cal machine gun would be much better to take out human targets.

"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 274 by Jon, posted 05-13-2007 1:32 PM Jon has not replied

ICANT
Member
Posts: 6769
From: SSC
Joined: 03-12-2007
Member Rating: 1.6


Message 279 of 305 (400427)
05-13-2007 4:21 PM
Reply to: Message 269 by Nuggin
05-13-2007 1:43 AM


Re: Icant - go back and read
Why can't you use a shotgun or a hunting rifle? Didn't you post earlier about how good you were with a bolt action?
My weapon of choice to fight with is a Springfield 30 cal. bolt action military rifle. I like it because of it's accuracy and the environment it can withstand and still be operational.
But everyone is not qualified expert marksman with one of these weapons. But with an m16 they would be just as lethal because of the extra round capability.
I notice you didn't mention the 170,000,000 people killed in the 87 years from 1900-1987 by their own governments. That comes to about 1 every 16.17 seconds.
This is the reason I said you can ban my automobile even take it away from me. But to get my guns there would only be one way like I posted in an earlier post. Message 223

"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 269 by Nuggin, posted 05-13-2007 1:43 AM Nuggin has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 287 by Nuggin, posted 05-14-2007 1:47 AM ICANT has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024