Secularists are trying to say the Grand Canyon is a couple of billion or so years old and yet the Mississippi is a mere 10000 years old. What gives here?? It appears they are trying to have it both ways so as to cover for both the deep GC and the relatively shallow Mississipi Valley as well as the relatively nonpronounced and small Mississippi Delta.
The average "secularist" will also tell you that it's the COLORADO river which flows through the bleedin' Grand Canyon, not the freakin' MISSISSIPPI river. It's this peculiar secularist ritual we have called "getting the frickin' facts right".
Sheesh, you guys.
This particular "secularist" would also like to remind you that there is a difference between the age of the rocks at the Grand Canyon site and the age of the canyon.
Some of the rocks are indeed 2 billion years old, but the canyon started being carved mere millions of years ago.
In the same way, a Renaissance scultor can carve a Jurrasic rock: the rock is millions of years old; the sculpture is centuries old; there is no contradiction here, as you'd have figured out if you'd spent ten seconds thought on the subject. But I guess thinking is a "secularist" thing.
I see there's quite a dispute at the GC Park Service about allowing the sales of an AIG book so as for both arguments to be available to the public.
Creationist rubbish about the Grand Canyon is already available to the public. If there is any dispute, it is over whether the Park Service should promulgate this trash.
If it's all up to the standard you've set here, then the answer is "no".
Can you give me any links referring to this dispute?
Edited by Dr Adequate, : No reason given.
Edited by Dr Adequate, : No reason given.
Edited by Dr Adequate, : No reason given.