Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 63 (9162 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 916,336 Year: 3,593/9,624 Month: 464/974 Week: 77/276 Day: 5/23 Hour: 0/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   A Deteriorating State :: Morality in the 21st Century
AdminModulous
Administrator
Posts: 897
Joined: 03-02-2006


Message 31 of 65 (401466)
05-20-2007 4:48 AM


Atheism
Atheism is in danger of becoming the central focus of this topic.
There are several threads out there: Atheism Examined or the still open Get Over Your Fear of Atheism
The question asked in the OP is: Does the state of our morality still risk such deterioration at the hands of the virus of religious fundamentalism? Where do we stand?

New Members should start HERE to get an understanding of what makes great posts.
Comments on moderation procedures (or wish to respond to admin messages)? - Go to:
General discussion of moderation procedures
Thread Reopen Requests
Considerations of topic promotions from the "Proposed New Topics" forum
Other useful links:
Forum Guidelines, Observations about Evolution and This could be interesting....

  
purpledawn
Member (Idle past 3476 days)
Posts: 4453
From: Indiana
Joined: 04-25-2004


Message 32 of 65 (401478)
05-20-2007 7:15 AM
Reply to: Message 1 by Jon
05-19-2007 3:25 AM


Re: Morality in the 21st Centurty
quote:
Is religious fundamentalism bringing our moral system down faster than Agnostic beliefs can rebuild it?
What examples do you have of religious fundamentalism actually bringing "our" moral system down?
The group in the article is probably hurting their own cause because of their methods. Did they succeed in changing anyone's moral behavior?
quote:
religious fundamentalism moves unchecked but for the few skeptical minds of an all-too-easily-convinced populace. Is it spreading too fast?
What do you mean unchecked? Unchecked for what? What evidence shows you that fundamentalism is actually spreading?
quote:
The students, the school officials, the news report, and I would imagine the general public all have shown a distaste for the message. Is this a sign of an improving morality for our nation and world, or is the mere existence of this group a sign of a worsening society?
By going into a school under false pretenses, the group undermines their own message. They didn't stick to the program they promised. I think the existence of the group is par for the course. IMO, there are always going to be dissatisfied groups.

"Peshat is what I say and derash is what you say." --Nehama Leibowitz

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Jon, posted 05-19-2007 3:25 AM Jon has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 35 by iceage, posted 05-20-2007 1:36 PM purpledawn has replied
 Message 37 by Jon, posted 05-20-2007 4:10 PM purpledawn has replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 412 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 33 of 65 (401494)
05-20-2007 9:48 AM
Reply to: Message 1 by Jon
05-19-2007 3:25 AM


Moral Systems?
The principal, equally as shocked, gave an apology for originally inviting the group to the school.
You have to wonder about the competence of the principal, since the agenda of "You Can Run but You Can't Hide" as well as JYP is pretty well known and clearly stated by them in all of their literature and even their website.
The issue in your example is not in the agenda of the speakers, but rather the absurd statement that the principal was surprised or shocked. For that to be true the principal was either woefully negligent in doing even a cursory diligence or dumber than a red brick. It is far more reasonable that the agenda was known beforehand but that the principal misjudged what the reaction of the students would be.
As to the question asked, which seems unrelated to the example you used, you asked:
Is religious fundamentalism bringing our moral system down faster than Agnostic beliefs can rebuild it?
I am curious how you think the example you cite has anything to do with morality?

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Jon, posted 05-19-2007 3:25 AM Jon has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 36 by Jon, posted 05-20-2007 4:09 PM jar has not replied

  
anglagard
Member (Idle past 855 days)
Posts: 2339
From: Socorro, New Mexico USA
Joined: 03-18-2006


Message 34 of 65 (401519)
05-20-2007 1:24 PM
Reply to: Message 20 by Nuggin
05-20-2007 1:37 AM


Re: Morality in the 21st Centurty
My position is that morality is both subjective and relative but according to current utilitarian standards, it is actually increasing over time. The argument is in the now closed thread Message 1
Naturally there are other standards than the greatest good for the greatest number, such as those found among bigots, ultranationalists, and religious fanatics.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 20 by Nuggin, posted 05-20-2007 1:37 AM Nuggin has not replied

  
iceage 
Suspended Member (Idle past 5933 days)
Posts: 1024
From: Pacific Northwest
Joined: 09-08-2003


Message 35 of 65 (401523)
05-20-2007 1:36 PM
Reply to: Message 32 by purpledawn
05-20-2007 7:15 AM


Re: Morality in the 21st Centurty
pd writes:
What examples do you have of religious fundamentalism actually bringing "our" moral system down?
Examples?
Historically...
  • Several Crusades
  • Various Inquisitions
  • Burning of "witches" (thou shalt not suffer a witch a to live)
  • Promotion of slavery (Jefferson Davis boasted slavery was established by decree of Almighty God...it is sanctioned in the Bible)
    Contemporary...
  • God hates fags
  • Waco and Jonestown
  • Murder of doctors (after all abortion cheapens life)
  • Polygamy (Mormon and Islam)
  • Jesus (hell) Camp
  • Jihad
  • Honor Killings
    Edited by iceage, : No reason given.

  • This message is a reply to:
     Message 32 by purpledawn, posted 05-20-2007 7:15 AM purpledawn has replied

    Replies to this message:
     Message 38 by purpledawn, posted 05-20-2007 5:22 PM iceage has replied
     Message 55 by ICANT, posted 05-22-2007 12:51 AM iceage has not replied

      
    Jon
    Inactive Member


    Message 36 of 65 (401549)
    05-20-2007 4:09 PM
    Reply to: Message 33 by jar
    05-20-2007 9:48 AM


    Re: Moral Systems?
    I am curious how you think the example you cite has anything to do with morality?
    Well, the purpose of the group was to spread flawed morals. Now, there were a lot of pissed off students, and a deal of angry teachers as well. But, one could imagine, there were also a small sect in that crowd that either agreed fully with the group's message, or was swayed from a previous system of morality.
    This ties in with the main topic of the post, which is whether or not the religious fundamentalists are ripping society's morality apart through efforts such as this. Or whether there are enough people like the students who walked out that realize what they did was wrong.
    Either the mindset of the group is spreading, or it isn't. I'm not exactly sure where the world stands in regards to that, so I asked the question here And was primarily prompted to think of it because of that news report.
    The issue in your example is not in the agenda of the speakers, but rather the absurd statement that the principal was surprised or shocked. For that to be true the principal was either woefully negligent in doing even a cursory diligence or dumber than a red brick. It is far more reasonable that the agenda was known beforehand but that the principal misjudged what the reaction of the students would be.
    That's a very interesting observation! I was wondering myself how someone could bring in a group like that without ever checking their website. Perhaps the principal knew all along!
    Jon

    This message is a reply to:
     Message 33 by jar, posted 05-20-2007 9:48 AM jar has not replied

      
    Jon
    Inactive Member


    Message 37 of 65 (401550)
    05-20-2007 4:10 PM
    Reply to: Message 32 by purpledawn
    05-20-2007 7:15 AM


    Re: Morality in the 21st Centurty
    What examples do you have of religious fundamentalism actually bringing "our" moral system down?
    The group in the article is probably hurting their own cause because of their methods. Did they succeed in changing anyone's moral behavior?
    Actually, I wasn't trying to make an argument. I was just asking a question, which this quote answers
    What do you mean unchecked? Unchecked for what? What evidence shows you that fundamentalism is actually spreading?
    Everything always spreads.
    Jon

    This message is a reply to:
     Message 32 by purpledawn, posted 05-20-2007 7:15 AM purpledawn has replied

    Replies to this message:
     Message 39 by purpledawn, posted 05-20-2007 5:30 PM Jon has not replied

      
    purpledawn
    Member (Idle past 3476 days)
    Posts: 4453
    From: Indiana
    Joined: 04-25-2004


    Message 38 of 65 (401556)
    05-20-2007 5:22 PM
    Reply to: Message 35 by iceage
    05-20-2007 1:36 PM


    Changing Moral System
    purpledawn writes:
    What examples do you have of religious fundamentalism actually bringing "our" moral system down?
    Maybe I misunderstood what Jon was saying (which seems to be par for the course); but when he said "bringing our moral system down", my impression is that he is talking about our current secular moral system actually changing. I didn't think he was talking about the behavior of specialty groups.
    quote:
    God hates fags
    Waco and Jonestown
    Murder of doctors (after all abortion cheapens life)
    Polygamy (Mormon and Islam)
    Jesus (hell) Camp
    Jihad
    Honor Killings
    How have any of those things changed our current secular moral system for the worst?

    "Peshat is what I say and derash is what you say." --Nehama Leibowitz

    This message is a reply to:
     Message 35 by iceage, posted 05-20-2007 1:36 PM iceage has replied

    Replies to this message:
     Message 50 by iceage, posted 05-21-2007 1:39 AM purpledawn has not replied

      
    purpledawn
    Member (Idle past 3476 days)
    Posts: 4453
    From: Indiana
    Joined: 04-25-2004


    Message 39 of 65 (401557)
    05-20-2007 5:30 PM
    Reply to: Message 37 by Jon
    05-20-2007 4:10 PM


    Re: Morality in the 21st Centurty
    Let me try this another way.
    What do you mean by bringing our moral system down?
    quote:
    Everything always spreads.
    One of these days you will learn to stop making absolute statements. You know as well as I do that that isn't a true statement.
    What makes you feel that fundamentalism is a virus or is spreading?

    "Peshat is what I say and derash is what you say." --Nehama Leibowitz

    This message is a reply to:
     Message 37 by Jon, posted 05-20-2007 4:10 PM Jon has not replied

      
    fallacycop
    Member (Idle past 5539 days)
    Posts: 692
    From: Fortaleza-CE Brazil
    Joined: 02-18-2006


    Message 40 of 65 (401564)
    05-20-2007 6:06 PM
    Reply to: Message 18 by Jon
    05-20-2007 12:41 AM


    Re: Morality in the 21st Centurty
    People say that there is a monster in Loch Ness. ... Is it not the more credible stance to conclude that the beastie does not exist? While, at the same time, acknowledging my limitations in proving this non-existence?
    No. The most credible and honest stance is to 'not conclude he does exist.'
    By what you`ve been saying in this thread, we all must conclude that you`re agnostic about the tooth fary, santa claus, the easter bunny, the loch ness monster, UFOs, the invisible pink unicorn, the flying spaghetti monster, the one eye on horn flying people eater, and the christian god. If that`s really the most credible, honest, and logic stance, as you say, then I would rather be insane.
    OFF TOPIC - Please Do Not Respond to this message or continue in this vein.
    Take comments to the Moderation Thread.
    AdminPD
    Edited by fallacycop, : typos
    Edited by AdminPD, : Warning

    This message is a reply to:
     Message 18 by Jon, posted 05-20-2007 12:41 AM Jon has not replied

      
    nator
    Member (Idle past 2188 days)
    Posts: 12961
    From: Ann Arbor
    Joined: 12-09-2001


    Message 41 of 65 (401574)
    05-20-2007 7:05 PM
    Reply to: Message 4 by Jon
    05-19-2007 6:00 AM


    Re: Morality in the 21st Centurty
    quote:
    What's the difference between a liberal and religious fundamentalist?
    Usually education.

    This message is a reply to:
     Message 4 by Jon, posted 05-19-2007 6:00 AM Jon has replied

    Replies to this message:
     Message 43 by Chiroptera, posted 05-20-2007 8:01 PM nator has not replied
     Message 44 by Jon, posted 05-20-2007 10:09 PM nator has replied

      
    nator
    Member (Idle past 2188 days)
    Posts: 12961
    From: Ann Arbor
    Joined: 12-09-2001


    Message 42 of 65 (401575)
    05-20-2007 7:23 PM
    Reply to: Message 22 by Jon
    05-20-2007 1:54 AM


    Re: Morality in the 21st Centurty
    So, what characterizes all liberals and religious fundamentalists such that they can be considered one and the same?
    Defining your terms would be welcome.
    Edited by nator, : No reason given.

    This message is a reply to:
     Message 22 by Jon, posted 05-20-2007 1:54 AM Jon has replied

    Replies to this message:
     Message 45 by Jon, posted 05-20-2007 10:22 PM nator has replied

      
    Chiroptera
    Inactive Member


    Message 43 of 65 (401580)
    05-20-2007 8:01 PM
    Reply to: Message 41 by nator
    05-20-2007 7:05 PM


    quote:
    What's the difference between a liberal and religious fundamentalist?
    Usually education.
    *snicker*

    Actually, if their god makes better pancakes, I'm totally switching sides. -- Charley the Australopithecine

    This message is a reply to:
     Message 41 by nator, posted 05-20-2007 7:05 PM nator has not replied

      
    Jon
    Inactive Member


    Message 44 of 65 (401603)
    05-20-2007 10:09 PM
    Reply to: Message 41 by nator
    05-20-2007 7:05 PM


    Re: Morality in the 21st Centurty
    quote:
    What's the difference between a liberal and religious fundamentalist?
    Usually education.
    So, as one becomes more educated, one also becomes more liberal? Will you back up that that is usually the case?

    This message is a reply to:
     Message 41 by nator, posted 05-20-2007 7:05 PM nator has replied

    Replies to this message:
     Message 46 by nator, posted 05-20-2007 10:39 PM Jon has replied

      
    Jon
    Inactive Member


    Message 45 of 65 (401608)
    05-20-2007 10:22 PM
    Reply to: Message 42 by nator
    05-20-2007 7:23 PM


    Re: Morality in the 21st Centurty
    So, what characterizes all liberals and religious fundamentalists such that they can be considered one and the same?
    Defining your terms would be welcome.
    Not all liberals, just liberals in general. Liberal, conservative, religious fundamentalist, atheist, Christian, Muslim, Hindu, etc. are all systems of morality/beliefs. Agnosticism is the method of logical evaluation of only those things known, with no assumptions, upon which science, truth, and knowledge are built.
    Jon

    This message is a reply to:
     Message 42 by nator, posted 05-20-2007 7:23 PM nator has replied

    Replies to this message:
     Message 47 by nator, posted 05-20-2007 10:52 PM Jon has not replied

      
    Newer Topic | Older Topic
    Jump to:


    Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

    ™ Version 4.2
    Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024