Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 63 (9162 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 916,332 Year: 3,589/9,624 Month: 460/974 Week: 73/276 Day: 1/23 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Pro-Brownback, Anti-Heliocentrism???
Taz
Member (Idle past 3310 days)
Posts: 5069
From: Zerus
Joined: 07-18-2006


Message 10 of 16 (401846)
05-22-2007 1:08 PM


I just read through it.
While I am still undecided as to whether this is a spoof or not, and I've seen some pretty convincing spoofs in my life, Sisyphus does have a point in the following.
quote:
“I think NASA has proven that the earth moves through space. Intrasolar probes have to retarget to the new location of Terra when they’re sending information back.”
That’s a situation in which it’s mathematically convenient to consider the Earth as moving. But objects only move relative to other objects. You can easily allow that one object (the Earth) holds still, in accordance with Scripture and the empirical evidence of those of us on Earth. That NASA has decided to view the Earth as moving was their moral and mathematical decision, not an Absolute Fact.
Ok, bare with me for a moment. Just imagine the Earth being truly fixed while the rest of the universe revolves around the Earth. Stop it. Just suspend your disbelief for a second. Also, ignore the fact that there is nothing that we know of that would hold Earth in a fixed position. Just imagine that the Earth is truly fixed with everything else moving around it.
The result would be just the same as if the Earth is orbiting the sun.
I think this guy has a point... if you ignore everything we know about physics.
Added by edit.
By the way, this is my favorite one.
quote:
I am sorry, Sisyphus, but you are wrong. The Earth revolves around the Sun. Our Sun revolves around the center of our solar system. Our solar system is moving through space.
Please visit our Vatican Website for clarification on valid science here:
Pontifical Academy of Sciences - Index
Peace be with you, my son.
- The Pope
Comment by The Pope ” May 21, 2007 @ 2:42 pm
Edited by Tazmanian Devil, : No reason given.


We are BOG. Resistance is voltage over current.
Disclaimer:
Occasionally, owing to the deficiency of the English language, I have used he/him/his meaning he or she/him or her/his or her in order to avoid awkwardness of style.
He, him, and his are not intended as exclusively masculine pronouns. They may refer to either sex or to both sexes!

Replies to this message:
 Message 11 by RAZD, posted 05-22-2007 2:17 PM Taz has replied

  
Taz
Member (Idle past 3310 days)
Posts: 5069
From: Zerus
Joined: 07-18-2006


Message 13 of 16 (401867)
05-22-2007 3:23 PM
Reply to: Message 11 by RAZD
05-22-2007 2:17 PM


Re: framed by the references - test your relatives?
RAZD, didn't I say to ignore everything we know about physics? The author of that blog did exactly that, and because of it the fixed Earth makes perfect sense. Remember that Einsteinian and Newtonian physics are wrong and that the metric system is pure evil. Your proposed experiments use all of these.
Enjoy


We are BOG. Resistance is voltage over current.
Disclaimer:
Occasionally, owing to the deficiency of the English language, I have used he/him/his meaning he or she/him or her/his or her in order to avoid awkwardness of style.
He, him, and his are not intended as exclusively masculine pronouns. They may refer to either sex or to both sexes!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 11 by RAZD, posted 05-22-2007 2:17 PM RAZD has not replied

  
Taz
Member (Idle past 3310 days)
Posts: 5069
From: Zerus
Joined: 07-18-2006


Message 14 of 16 (401868)
05-22-2007 3:25 PM
Reply to: Message 12 by cavediver
05-22-2007 3:12 PM


Re: Parody
Once upon a time I spent a couple hours reading through the teens 4 christ crap. It's places like that that makes me glad I'm not a monkey... I mean christian.


We are BOG. Resistance is voltage over current.
Disclaimer:
Occasionally, owing to the deficiency of the English language, I have used he/him/his meaning he or she/him or her/his or her in order to avoid awkwardness of style.
He, him, and his are not intended as exclusively masculine pronouns. They may refer to either sex or to both sexes!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 12 by cavediver, posted 05-22-2007 3:12 PM cavediver has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024