|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
Thread ▼ Details |
Member (Idle past 5189 days) Posts: 649 From: Melbourne, Australia Joined: |
|
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: Christianity Today: Atheism is the only rational outlook. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Phat Member Posts: 18338 From: Denver,Colorado USA Joined: Member Rating: 1.0 |
Phat writes: Jesus did make a path possible, where before Him there was no path. Jar writes: If that is true the God is even more evil than anyone could imagine. Of course, within the context of the belief, Jesus existed before any other human..so there was no lack of a path at any point in any humans personal history.
Jar writes: Left to us by whom? A message by definition needs to originate from a messenger.
Regardless of the reality of the Jesus story, it still is left to us to make the message, interpret the message and act on the message.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
jar Member (Idle past 421 days) Posts: 34026 From: Texas!! Joined: |
Of course, within the context of the belief, Jesus existed before any other human..so there was no lack of a path at any point in any humans personal history. Another silly soundbite theology. That one is really stupid and negates ANY possible purpose to Jesus life among us.
Left to us by whom? A message by definition needs to originate from a messenger. Really? Another silly soundbite. That is just more of the woo-woo factor silliness. Who is the messenger in a tree ring or waves on the sea or clouds in the sky? We are critters that look for patterns and then try to figure out why they exist. We are the messenger. Aslan is not a Tame Lion
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Phat Member Posts: 18338 From: Denver,Colorado USA Joined: Member Rating: 1.0 |
nemesis_juggernaut writes: The hilarious thing to me is that more atheists, arguably far smaller in number than theists, spend more time at Christian websites than Christians do. Now, why is that? Ringo writes: Same reason as why the monkey house at the zoo is so popular. "They're so much like us." "They're almost human." I can see and appreciate logical thought. I am personally curious why some people are so resistant to belief...as if they are afraid they will look stupid or something. Santa Claus is one thing. The idea of a Creator who interacts or has interacted personally with humanity is quite another, at least in my acceptance. I suppose that I really should stop worrying about changing or indoctrinating people!
Jar writes: Christians should definitely question whether "Jesus is the way, the truth, and the light" and if they do so honestly, they will find that Jesus is not the way, the truth, and the light and that that is simply another of the soundbite nonsense phrases beloved of those who want to keep folk ignorant. My defenses came up when I heard your assertion. I suppose that I shouldn't care what you say....IF my faith is strong, I don't have to accept being part of some mystical cult of ignorance either!
subbie writes: Jesus as the Way is also based on Faith and not Reason. I agree with you that Christians who attempt to logically prove their faith are often attacking monsters instead of simply allowing windmills to move hot air! I get irritated at Jar when he mocks belief statements as silly soundbites and then retorts with soundbites of his own. The votes were for the position that atheism is the only rational position. That isn't a vote "against" Christianity. It's simply an acknowledgment that Christianity is based on faith, not reason. Two of his more famous ones?1) It's Just That Simple 2) The Christian Cult Of Ignorance While it can be argued that much of Christian fundamentalist/charismatic belief theology is ignorant of the real world, I personally do not believe that I am willfully ignorant by believing that Jesus is The Way, Truth, and Light.
Ringo writes: I disagree quite passionately! My Belief system encourages daily prayer and meditation. What makes you think that communing with God is in any way dysfunctional or promoting willful ignorance? "Who" killed God is anybody who looks at the situation rationally, who doesn't need to postulate a supernatural cause for the wind and the rain, who doesn't need to consult a "Supreme Being" for every tidbit of advice on life. I think that people look for too many answers in test-tubes and secular psychological paradigms instead of praying and meditating and allowing the human subconscious to intermingle in Communion with the Divine and provide answers unobtainable through secular humanism and scientific empiricism.
Jar writes: It is my belief that He (or She) had to become human in order to show us a pattern to follow. Yes, it is a personal belief. No, it is not something that I want everyone to blindly agree with. Who is the messenger in a tree ring or waves on the sea or clouds in the sky? We are critters that look for patterns and then try to figure out why they exist. We are the messenger. If you disagree with the premise that Jesus is the answer, you better have a darn good reason why you can boldly proclaim your own intellect as the answer. Call me stupid, but I believe that my intellect left to its own devices inevitably disintegrates into Ego, Selfishness, and self-centered versus altruistic patterning.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
mark24 Member (Idle past 5222 days) Posts: 3857 From: UK Joined: |
Phat,
I can see and appreciate logical thought. I am personally curious why some people are so resistant to belief...as if they are afraid they will look stupid or something. If I accepted something that would affect my behaviour throughout my life without evidence, I would not only look stupid, I would actually be stupid, surely?
Santa Claus is one thing. The idea of a Creator who interacts or has interacted personally with humanity is quite another, at least in my acceptance. Why? There's no reason to accept either, I don't see how either proposition is qualitatively different.
If you disagree with the premise that Jesus is the answer, you better have a darn good reason why you can boldly proclaim your own intellect as the answer. Call me stupid, but I believe that my intellect left to its own devices inevitably disintegrates into Ego, Selfishness, and self-centered versus altruistic patterning. The reason I don't accept that "Jesus is the answer" is because there is no reason whatsoever to accept the premise. I believe that qualifies as "a darn good reason", don't you? That you implode into ego, selfishness, & self-centered "patterning" when your intellect is left to its own devices is a comment on you, not us. Moreover, it's a pretty piss-poor excuse for accepting the evidential equivalent of the tooth fairy as Absolute Fact. When my intellect is left to its own devices, logic, reason & what Xians call the golden rule wins through. Mark There are 10 kinds of people in this world; those that understand binary, & those that don't
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ringo Member (Idle past 439 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined: |
Phat writes: I am personally curious why some people are so resistant to belief... It's not resistance to belief per se - it's resistance to dependance on belief. Belief should never be anything but a fall-back position - it should never try to trump knowledge.
...as if they are afraid they will look stupid or something. It's not fear of "looking" stupid so much as fear of being stupid. A stupid person can have the strongest faith in the world. Does it make him less stupid?
Santa Claus is one thing. The idea of a Creator who interacts or has interacted personally with humanity is quite another, at least in my acceptance. "In my acceptance", there is no difference whatsoever between belief in Santa Claus and (some people's) belief in God. Go ahead, start a topic. I dare ya.
What makes you think that communing with God is in any way dysfunctional or promoting willful ignorance? Once again, it's the reliance on "communion with God" that is "dysfunctional". The typical Christian modus operandi is to "ask God for guidance" and "consult the scriptures" before making a decision. But in what way did that decision not come from your own mind? If the results are good, you give God the credit. If the results are bad, you blame yourself - you weren't listening hard enough. How is that not dysfunctional?
I think that people look for too many answers in test-tubes and secular psychological paradigms... The question is, "Do the test-tubes and psychological paradigms work?"
... instead of praying and meditating... And how does praying and meditating work in comparison? When your car won't start, do you pray or do you open the hood? When you have a pain, do you pray or do you go to the doctor? There's nothing wrong with praying while looking under the hood or while on your way to the doctor - but prayer is not a substitute for practical action.
... allowing the human subconscious to intermingle in Communion with the Divine... 'Twas brillig and the slithy toves.....
... answers unobtainable through secular humanism and scientific empiricism. Do you decide the answers are "unobtainable" before or after you try to find them? Edited by Ringo, : "unattainable" --> "unobtainable". Help scientific research in your spare time. No cost. No obligation. Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
jar Member (Idle past 421 days) Posts: 34026 From: Texas!! Joined: |
If you disagree with the premise that Jesus is the answer, you better have a darn good reason why you can boldly proclaim your own intellect as the answer. That is all we have to work with Phat. Aslan is not a Tame Lion
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
New Cat's Eye Inactive Member |
all I see in the link is a poll about divorce...
What were the results of the "Atheism is..." poll?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
dwise1 Member Posts: 5951 Joined: Member Rating: 5.1 |
Read on through the thread.
After about 94% of the responses agreed that atheism is the only rational outlook, they pulled the poll off the page. With no announcement that they had done it. The divorce poll was there before along with the atheism poll. I believe that it was the previous poll.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
AdminAsgara Administrator (Idle past 2330 days) Posts: 2073 From: The Universe Joined: |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
dwise1 Member Posts: 5951 Joined: Member Rating: 5.1 |
"In my acceptance", there is no difference whatsoever between belief in Santa Claus and (some people's) belief in God. Go ahead, start a topic. I dare ya. There was an excellent article on that very subject that was posted on our church bulletin board for a long time. I sure wish I had run a xerox of it before it was taken down (I asked, but nobody in the office could find it). Most people's ideas of God were formed when they were children and, as they matured, they failed to go back and revised those ideas. So most people have immature and childish ideas and beliefs about God. "God as Santa Claus" or "God as Cop" or "God as Big Brother" (as in "1984") or "God as Dutch Uncle". Since "sound bites" are being thrown around here, I'll offer one that's most commonly associated with our church:"To question is the answer." We need to constantly question our beliefs and our understandings. Because we are human, most of our beliefs and our understanding of things, including of our beliefs, are mistaken. Only by questioning what we think we know and understand can we detect when we're mistaken. By refusing or neglecting to question anything, we run the certain risk of holding blindly to childish beliefs which are certainly wrong.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
jar Member (Idle past 421 days) Posts: 34026 From: Texas!! Joined: |
There are two types of people.
There are those who look for Answers to Questions. There are those who look for Answers to Question. Aslan is not a Tame Lion
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Asgara Member (Idle past 2330 days) Posts: 1783 From: Wisconsin, USA Joined: |
Reminds me of one of my favorite quotes...
quote: Edited by Asgara, : added to quote
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
nator Member (Idle past 2197 days) Posts: 12961 From: Ann Arbor Joined: |
quote: It has nothing at all to do with looking stupid. It has everything to do with actually being stupid. Making decisions based upon reason or evidence or thinking through the consequences for me and others seems like a good way to go. Instead making decisions based upon "woo" or what somebody else told me "the big woo in the sky" wants me to do seems foolish and thoughtless at best and downright dangerous at worst. It is a lot easier to not take personal responsibility for your own choices and instead "give up your life to God", but I think that's ultimately just lazy.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
riVeRraT Member (Idle past 443 days) Posts: 5788 From: NY USA Joined: |
My defenses came up when I heard your assertion. I suppose that I shouldn't care what you say....IF my faith is strong, I don't have to accept being part of some mystical cult of ignorance either! Well put, and I feel the same way. Only one thing is clear when it comes to the gospel according to jar, and that is that nothing is ever actually totally clear. The only impression I get from all of jar's writings on a whole is that he is conforming to the world, and being part of the world, to try and do.... what? Of course as Christians we should all be part of the world, but in our hearts we belong to God.
I get irritated at Jar when he mocks belief statements as silly soundbites and then retorts with soundbites of his own. This is the gospel according to jar AAAAmen... now kneel.
I disagree quite passionately! My Belief system encourages daily prayer and meditation. What makes you think that communing with God is in any way dysfunctional or promoting willful ignorance? I think that people look for too many answers in test-tubes and secular psychological paradigms instead of praying and meditating and allowing the human subconscious to intermingle in Communion with the Divine and provide answers unobtainable through secular humanism and scientific empiricism. w00t!
Call me stupid, but I believe that my intellect left to its own devices inevitably disintegrates into Ego, Selfishness, and self-centered versus altruistic patterning. And that is where religion starts, well put phat, love ya man!
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
riVeRraT Member (Idle past 443 days) Posts: 5788 From: NY USA Joined: |
Making decisions based upon reason or evidence or thinking through the consequences for me and others seems like a good way to go. Well it is a good thing lewis and clark, or columbus didn't think that way.
It is a lot easier to not take personal responsibility for your own choices and instead "give up your life to God", but I think that's ultimately just lazy. This kind of thought process has been expressed many times in this forum. This is a huge mistake. At no time are we giving up our personal responsibility for our choices. And if you are truely giving up your life to God, then things do not get lazy. things like forgiveness and helping others, or loving them, come at a cost of putting aside our own personal desires. Intially this is hard to do, but then God makes up for it somehow, and that is where the battle ensues.
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024