|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
EvC Forum active members: 66 (9164 total) |
| |
ChatGPT | |
Total: 916,475 Year: 3,732/9,624 Month: 603/974 Week: 216/276 Day: 56/34 Hour: 2/2 |
Thread ▼ Details |
Member (Idle past 6097 days) Posts: 65 From: Los Angeles, California Joined: |
|
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: The God of the Bible is Evil | |||||||||||||||||||||||
ringo Member (Idle past 434 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined: |
...show what in the OT leads you to believe that God is all knowing. Proverbs 5:21 This is why I ask people to quote the verse instead of just the reference.
quote: "He" seems to refer to man, not God - i.e. man pondereth all his goings. Nothing to do with God being "all-knowing". Help scientific research in your spare time. No cost. No obligation. Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
jar Member (Idle past 416 days) Posts: 34026 From: Texas!! Joined: |
I'm sorry, I didn't realize that was your position. It's rather unusual, though. This is the first time I've encountered anyone (so far as I know, anyway) who believes in a god afflicted by ignorance. The topic is "The God of the Bible is Evil" and in support of that position, several quotations and instance from the Bible have been introduced. So far, I do not believe that they have supported such an assertion, and, as a matter of fact, some actually refute such a position. The question you raise is also irrelevant. Whether or not GOD is All-Knowing or ignorant has nothing to do with either the topic or what has been presented so far. Frankly, there are Bible stories that support either position. The point is, the stories in the Bible were meant to help man understand relationships, GOD's relationship with Man, Man's relationship with God, Man's relationship with his fellowman and with the world we all live in. What this topic addresses is whether the God of the Bible is evil. So far no one has introduced or supported such an assertion. Aslan is not a Tame Lion
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
berberry Inactive Member |
Ringo asks:
quote: I dunno, maybe because no one worships Little Red Riding Hood? So far as I've seen, anyway. But what do I know? I didn't even realize that God is ignorant until today. W.W.E.D.?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
berberry Inactive Member |
jar writes me:
quote: Yes it does. It has everything to do with it. If God is ignorant, then perhaps he can be excused for his immoral displays of genocidal revenge, bloodlust and egomania. If he's all-knowing, he can't be excused. W.W.E.D.?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
jar Member (Idle past 416 days) Posts: 34026 From: Texas!! Joined: |
Yes it does. It has everything to do with it. If God is ignorant, then perhaps he can be excused for his immoral displays of genocidal revenge, bloodlust and egomania. If he's all-knowing, he can't be excused. Sorry but you have never shown any supporting evidence for any of those assertions. In fact, so far the examples cited have actually refuted the assertion that the God of the Bible is Evil. We are discussing the "God of the Bible" in this thread. As I have pointed out several times in this thread, there is NO God of the Bible. Instead, there are many different depictions found in the Bible and those tales should be looked at within the context of the full story. Aslan is not a Tame Lion
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Taz Member (Idle past 3313 days) Posts: 5069 From: Zerus Joined: |
According to the new international version
quote: We are BOG. Resistance is voltage over current. Disclaimer: Occasionally, owing to the deficiency of the English language, I have used he/him/his meaning he or she/him or her/his or her in order to avoid awkwardness of style. He, him, and his are not intended as exclusively masculine pronouns. They may refer to either sex or to both sexes!
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
ringo Member (Idle past 434 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined: |
berberry writes: Why do differently with the Bible? I dunno, maybe because no one worships Little Red Riding Hood? What has worship got to do with it? If we approach one piece of literature in the way it was intended, why not do the same with all literature? Help scientific research in your spare time. No cost. No obligation. Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
ringo Member (Idle past 434 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined: |
Tazmanian Devil writes: According to the new international version.... We are looking at how God is portrayed in the Bible. The whole God-is-all-knowing sideshow is off-topic unless you can show that that is how God is portrayed. Your one reference ain't doin' it. Examining man's paths (whether done by God or man himself) doe not imply "all-knowing". Edited by Ringo, : Capitalization. Help scientific research in your spare time. No cost. No obligation. Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
jar Member (Idle past 416 days) Posts: 34026 From: Texas!! Joined: |
The passage implies that God watches what people do and so is aware. It does not imply any foreknowledge.
"He knows when you are sleeping He knows when you're awake. He knows when you've been bad or good, so be good for goodness sake." Aslan is not a Tame Lion
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Taz Member (Idle past 3313 days) Posts: 5069 From: Zerus Joined: |
Ringo writes:
I thought berberry made it clear. Whether god is all knowing or not has everything to do with the matter. The whole God-is-all-knowing sideshow is off-topic unless you can show that that is how God is portrayed. Back to the killing of the egyptian first borns. If god was all knowing, he would have been able to think of other ways to approach the problem without killing the innocents. The fact that he chose not pursue a less evil way at doing things make him evil.
Your one reference ain't doin' it. Examining man's paths (whether done by God or man himself) doe not imply "all-knowing".
Ok, you got me on this one. So, let us assume that the god that killed the egyptian children is not all knowing. The only way for him not to be evil is if he is so ignorant that he wasn't capable of conjuring up other, less evil ways to free his people. If we are willing to admit that the specific god mentioned in exodus is stupid enough to not be able to free his people without killing innocent children, then I'll agree to push back the table and call it a night. We are BOG. Resistance is voltage over current. Disclaimer: Occasionally, owing to the deficiency of the English language, I have used he/him/his meaning he or she/him or her/his or her in order to avoid awkwardness of style. He, him, and his are not intended as exclusively masculine pronouns. They may refer to either sex or to both sexes!
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
ringo Member (Idle past 434 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined: |
Tazmanian Devil writes: The only way for him not to be evil is if he is so ignorant that he wasn't capable of conjuring up other, less evil ways to free his people. You're ignoring the context in which Exodus was written. The people who wrote the book didn't consider it evil to kill their enemies - men, women or children. God chose a method that was morally acceptable to the people portraying Him. Your concept of "evil" is irrelevant. Help scientific research in your spare time. No cost. No obligation. Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Taz Member (Idle past 3313 days) Posts: 5069 From: Zerus Joined: |
And as I pointed this out earlier, if you want to take this route, we'd have to admit that Hitler wasn't evil, neither were the crusaders who killed every living soul in Jerusalem during the first crusade, neither was slavery, etc.
Simple yes or no. Do you think slavery was evil or not? Do you think Hitler was evil or not? We are BOG. Resistance is voltage over current. Disclaimer: Occasionally, owing to the deficiency of the English language, I have used he/him/his meaning he or she/him or her/his or her in order to avoid awkwardness of style. He, him, and his are not intended as exclusively masculine pronouns. They may refer to either sex or to both sexes!
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
berberry Inactive Member |
jar writes me:
quote: As I see it, jar, the phrase "god of the bible" refers to Jehovah, the incubus that impregnated Mary. The Episcopal church I grew up in taught, in no uncertain terms, that God was all-knowing, all-seeing and all-powerful, thus I usually take that much as a given in discussions of this sort. I'm talking about the god who is presented mostly - but not entirely - in the old testament. The one who ordered the Amalekites slaughtered, including the suckling infants. The one who killed Lot's wife for showing the slightest sign of intellectual curiosity. The one who never got round to telling Lot that he was wrong to offer his daughters to be gang-raped by an angry mob. The one who, for that matter, never bothered to tell anyone that women shouldn't be treated as property, nor that slavery was wrong. This god bears no resemblance to the god I once worshiped, and in fact I was taught that all those horrible stories were false. They were stories told by particular tribes to scare other tribes; barely civilized people trying to manipulate other barely civilized people with tales meant to show that "my god is bigger than your god", more or less. Therefore, they weren't stories about god at all, just early concepts of him. Suppose we were talking about Richard III, as presented by Shakespeare. If we are to judge whether or not Shakespeare's version of Richard is evil or immoral, we can't bring the real Richard III into the picture - except so far as the play itself does (I hope you know something about Richard III - if not, suffice it to say that Shakespeare, for political reasons, depicted him very unfairly). If we do, we're judging the historical Richard, not Shakespeare's creation. But there IS a Richard III in Shakespeare's play, and even though the Bard's Richard is only a character who never existed, we CAN judge his actions as they are presented to us. In the same way, there IS a character called God in the bible, and we can judge his actions too, at least as they are presented to us. This god might be entirely fictional (as I believe God is, anyway), but as a character in a book I believe we are fully entitled to pass judgement on him. Frankly, I don't fully understand your assertion that there is no god of the bible. You seem to refute that yourself right away when you say there are many different depictions of him.
quote: Yes. And that is why the stories told about god in the bible are relevant. And since they are relevant, it is not only fair but absolutely imperitive to consider these stories and whether or not the actions related can be reconciled with a god who is not evil. And that is why the importance of your assertion that god might be ignorant can't be overstated. Edited by berberry, : Reworded one sentence in the part about Richard III. W.W.E.D.?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
berberry Inactive Member |
You're really funny sometimes, jar. Seriously, I got a good laugh out of that!
W.W.E.D.?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
jar Member (Idle past 416 days) Posts: 34026 From: Texas!! Joined: |
I'm talking about the god who is presented mostly - but not entirely - in the old testament. The one who ordered the Amalekites slaughtered, including the suckling infants. The one who killed Lot's wife for showing the slightest sign of intellectual curiosity. The one who never got round to telling Lot that he was wrong to offer his daughters to be gang-raped by an angry mob. The one who, for that matter, never bothered to tell anyone that women shouldn't be treated as property, nor that slavery was wrong. But women were property, and were treated as property, somewhat more valuable though than a goat or cow. Again, the stories need to be considered within the context of the peoples that wrote them.
Yes. And that is why the stories told about god in the bible are relevant. And since they are relevant, it is not only fair but absolutely imperitive to consider these stories and whether or not the actions related can be reconciled with a god who is not evil. And that is why the importance of your assertion that god might be ignorant can't be overstated. Sorry but that is not just my assertion, it is what some of the stories in the Bible say. Aslan is not a Tame Lion
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024