First of all, my apology for the previous post. I was bitten by the anger bug last night.
It's a fair question.
Is it really?
Back to my niece. One time I was babysitting her after school. We started talking about stuff. It turned out that she had learned that animal eat fruit and inadvertantly deposit the seeds around. This is a 10 year old kid in grade school we're talking about.
It's not that I think every question about evolution means creationist propaganda. It's just that some of these questions really really make me think it's creationist attempt to spark up controversy. Why? Because these are the most obvious of the obvious stuff. Like I said, it's stuff that they teach in grade school. In fact, right now at this moment I am vaguely remembering learning about this in grade school, and it was a christian school I went to.
Another reason is the only time I've ever seen people not know this very common knowledge stuff is when they are creationists thinking they've stumbled onto something that would disprove evolution for good.
You eat an apple. Either you crap out the seeds or you throw away the core somewhere else far away from the mother tree. It doesn't take that much mental effort to then come up with the idea that the more spread out the seeds are the better for the genes of the individual because of less competition for resources with the mother tree. Also more chances of survival of the "family" gene. You don't need a college biology degree. Grade school stuff.
We are BOG. Resistance is voltage over current.
Disclaimer:
Occasionally, owing to the deficiency of the English language, I have used he/him/his meaning he or she/him or her/his or her in order to avoid awkwardness of style.
He, him, and his are not intended as exclusively masculine pronouns. They may refer to either sex or to both sexes!
™ Version 4.2
