Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9162 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 915,806 Year: 3,063/9,624 Month: 908/1,588 Week: 91/223 Day: 2/17 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   A Question of the Heart
Larni
Member (Idle past 163 days)
Posts: 4000
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005


Message 7 of 36 (402650)
05-29-2007 8:46 AM
Reply to: Message 5 by Faithful Servant
05-29-2007 12:53 AM


Faithfull Servant writes:
I'm interested in what the scientific community has to say here also because, even though study is being conducted on cognition, I just don't feel it "measures up" to the accuracy and clarity of the Bible account.
Care to specify which research does not measure up?
I would love to see you put the present research and it's predictive value about the mind and behaviour up against your bible.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 5 by Faithful Servant, posted 05-29-2007 12:53 AM Faithful Servant has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 16 by Faithful Servant, posted 05-29-2007 10:07 PM Larni has replied

  
Larni
Member (Idle past 163 days)
Posts: 4000
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005


Message 30 of 36 (402819)
05-30-2007 3:32 AM
Reply to: Message 16 by Faithful Servant
05-29-2007 10:07 PM


Faithfull Servant writes:
All of it.
Plase answer my question: What actual piece of neuro/cognitive research does not measure up?
Or are you saying that all scientific research does not measure up?
Will you soon be saying that geological/genetic evidence that indicates the impossiblility of the Flood, does not measure up too?
Or what about the age of the Earth?
What pieces of research don't measure up?
Where is the lit review you have undertaken to allow you to make such statements?
Faithfull Servant writes:
There is much research in this area but, the bible is direct and to the point about the who, what, where and when with regards to cognition.
and
Faithfull Servant writes:
I understand that science can tell us how we think, why we think, what we think about, where thinking takes place.
Do you see that you are already contradicting yourself?
Faithfull Servant writes:
What does science have to say about the law of cause and effect? From what I understand, nothing from nothing equals nothing. So, how could this universe come about without a cause? I've heard the big bang theory and all that, but it deviates from, rather than addresses the question. If, in the beginning,(there has to be a beginning because this universe contains energy that is slowly being depleted, eventually to nothing) there was NOTHING, where did ANYTHING come from?
What has this got to do with the OP?
Sounds like creo bait and switch, to me.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 16 by Faithful Servant, posted 05-29-2007 10:07 PM Faithful Servant has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024