However, not all evolutionists think along these lines. The falsity of this perspective is openly admitted by some evolutionists. In the words “all birds have wings, but not all creatures with wings are birds," the well known anatomist Bernard Wood indicates the hollowness of the logic that regards walking on two legs as a defining characteristic of being human. (6)
'Tis funny really. Since you missed the obvious comparison - birds are bipedal.
The ape in the picture to the left is walking on two legs.
However, this is why I'm responded. Not only are you plagiarising from
this source, but you haven't even editted out the bits that make it obvious you have plagiarised. In the first thing I quoted, you left a reference without telling us what that reference was. This leads me to suspect you didn't pay a great deal of attention to what you were doing. Either way, passing off someone else's work as your own is not only lazy, but it is intellectually dishonest and tarnishes your credibility considerably. It is also against the forum rules.
The report of a discovery in the well-known Scottish newspaper, The Scotsman, tore down another of the classical myths of evolution.
Yet more
plagiarism. As a result of this, I'm hiding your text. You may edit it so that it gives credit where it is due, but is mostly in your own words if you want it to be visible again.
If you wish to discuss this moderator action click in the appropriate link in the blue box below: