Evolution impossible as cannot apply meaning to code

Evolutionists forget that matter is not purposeful. Matter does not think or have concepts. It can take a concept and you can build something out of it. but it cannot do it without outside information. Heres just one of the reasons why:The genetic code could not have been built without a creator to apply meaning to that code. Lets say you put all the letters in the english language and jumble them about in a hat and eventually you get out the sequence CAT. We can say that has arisen by chance and it means pussy cat. The thing is, it doesn't. It means nothing. You tell that to a Chinese person and they won't understand. because they don't have the meaning. The reason we do is because we have applied that meaning to it. You don't think in a language, you think in a concept. And then put that concept, into a code that you have agreed on. Like cat means pussy etc. The code can't arise on it's own. So if you shook the genetic code about you wouldn't get anything out unless someone had applied meaning to that code so that it knows what to do when you put it in certain sequences.Heres another example on why life is impossible without God:Alot of evolution books state you could type on a keyboard randomly for eternity and eventually write a book. Well I doubt it but IF that did happen, two things pose a problem. first of all, where are you gonna get the keyboard from and the meaningful letters from? Secondly and most importantly. ALL the reactions in our bodie are REVERSIBLE. If you put certain substances on your tongue you can die instantly. Why? because it is all reversible. So, the keyboard of life would type in. But then type out so you could type forever and not get anything on the paper so to speak. So we can see the correct formula is:Energy + Matter + KNOW-HOW = Life.WhereasEnergy + Matter + TIME = Nothing.

Your missing the point. It has everything to do with evolution as evolution is a theory and how life began and developed. evolution claims the first primitive cell... if there are such things as "primitive" cells. Anything that can extract energy from it's environment and then have the blueprint to replicate itself is not primitive. And won't arise by chance. you try it. And namely the books i say that talk about typing randomly for along time are Richard Dawkins The Blind Watch Maker is one of them. Never does he mention where the computer came from. And why ever they say that natural selection seperates the good from the bad I don't know... in science you find the good stuff breaks down ever so quickly and the bad bits you can't get rid of. We claim we are educated but to put down the most super machine you can think of - the human body. Down to chance is absurd. The idea that different sexes arose by chance and that by eating a few potatoes a woman can churn out a baby with all the info on how to do so on the size of a pin head. The sperm. And a self healing body with a brain that does a supreme diagnosis of whats wrong if you get a cut or something like that. If you think long enough on these things and stop telling yourself that the design we see is an illusion. We can come to only one logical explanation. The failed evolution experiments and getting life out by chance support this also. Oh but it only happened once they say over billions of years. Well anything that can't be repeated, is not science.

There are no new species. New ones being discovered maybe. Evolution hasn't been proven at all. Anyone who knows quantum theory knows it's impossible. Things go in leaps, theres no gradual move into another species. people who learn this evolution fairy tale in school hanve to unlearn it when they come to do quantum theory. Then they realise that 2 + 2 does not equal 5.A side question:If we evolve for the better. and we came from apes, why are they much stronger than we? we got weaker?

"All this talk about "logic problems" is not going to make the evidence go away."I'm sorry, If you throw away your logic and what your brain tells you makes sense for what you believe to be evidence to the contrary i'm afraid I can't help you.crashfrog,Stronger IS better in every aspect of life, even for us making the things we need to make to do things for which we lack the strength to do alone. Matter does not know what we might invent so that it reduces strength. If evolution seperates good from bad, you say this is an exception where some good goes away for no apparent reason?

You mean to say that matter thinks and works out that this might be better? As it is worried about food? It doesn't have a clue about food or anything. It doesn't think. natural selection seperates good from bad. You can't have that both ways to think when necessary.

http://www.wildersmith.org- Media LibraryEvolution V CreationIs Man A Machine?These will help you my friends.