Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
1 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,745 Year: 4,002/9,624 Month: 873/974 Week: 200/286 Day: 7/109 Hour: 0/3


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   The evolution of religion?
RAZD
Member (Idle past 1430 days)
Posts: 20714
From: the other end of the sidewalk
Joined: 03-14-2004


Message 4 of 69 (404012)
06-06-2007 10:20 AM
Reply to: Message 3 by Dr Adequate
06-06-2007 9:31 AM


Re: Make Of This What You Will
Good ol' Skinner, the behavioral psychologist that placed his own kids in glass boxes, of Walden II utopia notoriety, and who trained pigeons to guide missiles to their targets (from inside) for the US army (the first "smart bombs"?). I would say the pigeons were trained to repeat motions they had been doing (randomly) between the hopper feedings.

Join the effort to unravel AIDS/HIV, unfold Proteomes, fight Cancer,
compare Fiocruz Genome and fight Muscular Dystrophy with Team EvC! (click)


we are limited in our ability to understand
by our ability to understand
RebelAAmericanOZen[Deist
... to learn ... to think ... to live ... to laugh ...
to share.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 3 by Dr Adequate, posted 06-06-2007 9:31 AM Dr Adequate has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 5 by Dr Adequate, posted 06-06-2007 10:27 AM RAZD has not replied

  
RAZD
Member (Idle past 1430 days)
Posts: 20714
From: the other end of the sidewalk
Joined: 03-14-2004


Message 8 of 69 (404034)
06-06-2007 11:43 AM
Reply to: Message 1 by ogon
06-05-2007 5:24 PM


possible alternative view
Some similar previous threads:
http://< !--UB EvC Forum: Evolutionary Origin of Religious Belief -->http://EvC Forum: Evolutionary Origin of Religious Belief -->EvC Forum: Evolutionary Origin of Religious Belief< !--UE-->
http://< !--UB EvC Forum: What is the evolutionary advantage to religion? -->http://EvC Forum: What is the evolutionary advantage to religion? -->EvC Forum: What is the evolutionary advantage to religion?< !--UE-->
Much of human life in all corners of the Earth, over vast periods of time, has believed in the supernatural.
And no two original beliefs are the same. On the other hand the ascetic "religious experience" is fairly universal. Thus if god(s) are true, then they are unknowable (deism), OR there are no god(s).
Is religion then judged to be part of mans evolution? If mankind evolved in ways that guaranteed his survival, hunting, gathering, reproducing, what role did the belief in the supernatural and subsequently religion play in this evolution?
We may be asking this question the wrong way. Religious belief could also be a side product of some other evolved behavior. In Message 105 I posted some thoughts in a different direction:
I have also been toying with the concept that instinctual group behavior (with social group behavior being partly instinctual) is part of the cause of religious behavior: religions appeal to the instinctual level to form and mold group behavior under a group leader or leaders, and that externalizing this to leaders outside the normal group limits may have been crucial to early human survival. Thus the instinctual basis is the reason we have evolved religions. This should be a new thread, and I haven't really put it together yet (my energy level is low these days).
Thus the drive to form a religion is based on instinctual behavior for group social species and (evolved or learned) codes of behavior, similar to many animal species we know. Thus you would have
Leader Person (A) has religious experience
Group (A) (with Person (A)) forms a religion around the experience
Successful formulations increase group bond and inter-individual behavior to the benefit of the group. The religions evolve over time to add elements not in the original vision, by leaders, for group control.
Group (A) divides or mingle with non-religion group and form new groups with common basis allowing inter-group behavior to the benefit of the groups involved.
Thus you end up with evolved religion, but the question of god(s) unresolved.
Is it only now with the establishment of science that religion is seen as a tail no longer needed or used? Or am I way off course?
I would say "with the establishment of rational thinking that religion ... etc". I think (personal opinion) that formal religions are no longer needed, and that they interfere with real spiritual growth or possibilities, because they are hindered by the dogma based on those added crowd control elements.
{ABE}
There is also some medical evidence that a spiritual attitude, independent of any specific religion, is beneficial to the overall health of the individual, and this would select for individuals that had spiritual\religious experiences.
{/abe}
Enjoy.
Edited by RAZD, : added

Join the effort to unravel AIDS/HIV, unfold Proteomes, fight Cancer,
compare Fiocruz Genome and fight Muscular Dystrophy with Team EvC! (click)


we are limited in our ability to understand
by our ability to understand
RebelAAmericanOZen[Deist
... to learn ... to think ... to live ... to laugh ...
to share.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by ogon, posted 06-05-2007 5:24 PM ogon has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 13 by ogon, posted 06-06-2007 3:23 PM RAZD has replied
 Message 30 by anastasia, posted 06-12-2007 11:24 PM RAZD has not replied

  
RAZD
Member (Idle past 1430 days)
Posts: 20714
From: the other end of the sidewalk
Joined: 03-14-2004


Message 9 of 69 (404036)
06-06-2007 11:45 AM
Reply to: Message 7 by Archer Opteryx
06-06-2007 10:54 AM


Re: Make Of This What You Will
You've got to admire anyone who finds a use for pigeons at all.
Not to squabble, but I think there is at least one good use ...
Edited by RAZD, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 7 by Archer Opteryx, posted 06-06-2007 10:54 AM Archer Opteryx has not replied

  
RAZD
Member (Idle past 1430 days)
Posts: 20714
From: the other end of the sidewalk
Joined: 03-14-2004


Message 14 of 69 (404103)
06-06-2007 4:21 PM
Reply to: Message 13 by ogon
06-06-2007 3:23 PM


Re: possible alternative view
... what having a spiritual attitude involves ...
Meditation, study of a wide variety of spiritual texts (expose self to different views), setting time aside for personal introspection.
... how does one then promote spiritual growth?
It is a personal journey, and no-one can tell you what your path is. Getting rid of dogma (walls) lets those paths go where they will.
Enjoy.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 13 by ogon, posted 06-06-2007 3:23 PM ogon has not replied

  
RAZD
Member (Idle past 1430 days)
Posts: 20714
From: the other end of the sidewalk
Joined: 03-14-2004


Message 19 of 69 (404202)
06-07-2007 3:56 AM
Reply to: Message 17 by ogon
06-07-2007 2:18 AM


Re: Make Of This What You Will
Another thing to consider in formalized religion is cult indoctrination techniques. Remember once the initial formulation of the religion has passed the dogma\tradition\ceremonial aspects of the religion are about crowd control by those who want to remain leaders.
Cult Recruitment | HowStuffWorks
quote:
A destructive cult uses countless techniques to get its members to stay, commit themselves and take part in what may be harmful activities. The sum of these techniques constitutes what some people call "mind control." It's also known as "thought reform," "brainwashing" and "coercive persuasion," and it involves the systematic breakdown of a person's sense of self.
http://www.ex-cult.org/fwbo/fwbosection2.htm
quote:
A cult is: an organisation which systematically uses brainwashing or mind control processes to change the way its individual members think, in order to subvert their free will and restrict their independent judgement . The aim is to undermine members' own self reliance, so that they gradually come to place more trust in the insights of the group leadership than in their own judgement. A cult is not necessarily harmful in this definition.
Note that these same techniques are used during soldier indoctrination (called boot camp), even in the US forces (explains a lot about the attitudes of soldiers to command leadership). The GOP party? DNC?
This also plays to the same instinctual/evolved social group behavior patterns, so many people are easy subjects for such indoctrinations.
Enjoy.

Join the effort to unravel AIDS/HIV, unfold Proteomes, fight Cancer,
compare Fiocruz Genome and fight Muscular Dystrophy with Team EvC! (click)


we are limited in our ability to understand
by our ability to understand
RebelAAmericanOZen[Deist
... to learn ... to think ... to live ... to laugh ...
to share.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 17 by ogon, posted 06-07-2007 2:18 AM ogon has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 31 by anastasia, posted 06-12-2007 11:33 PM RAZD has not replied

  
RAZD
Member (Idle past 1430 days)
Posts: 20714
From: the other end of the sidewalk
Joined: 03-14-2004


Message 25 of 69 (404273)
06-07-2007 5:50 PM
Reply to: Message 24 by crashfrog
06-07-2007 5:24 PM


Re: Religion results from experience
Go ahead and make whatever personal attacks it takes to dismiss the skeptics out of hand.
Looked in the mirror of late? .

This message is a reply to:
 Message 24 by crashfrog, posted 06-07-2007 5:24 PM crashfrog has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 26 by crashfrog, posted 06-07-2007 6:01 PM RAZD has replied

  
RAZD
Member (Idle past 1430 days)
Posts: 20714
From: the other end of the sidewalk
Joined: 03-14-2004


Message 27 of 69 (404280)
06-07-2007 6:34 PM
Reply to: Message 26 by crashfrog
06-07-2007 6:01 PM


Re: Religion results from experience
I don't know where people get this idea that I'm making all these personal attacks.
I was thinking more of the dismissal of evidence out of hand. I have trouble with this. Even though the experiences cannot be replicated on demand does not mean that they do not occur, nor does it mean that there is no connection, no matter how poorly understood the experience is (even by the observer). There are valid conclusions that are not provable nor falsifiable, and those conclusions cannot be dismissed out of hand as not being correct:
Delusion works both ways:
de·lu·sion -noun1. an act or instance of deluding.
2. the state of being deluded.
3. a false belief or opinion: delusions of grandeur.
4. Psychiatry. a fixed false belief that is resistant to reason or confrontation with actual fact: a paranoid delusion.
We could rid the world of all religions and faiths and these experiences would still occur.
The question is what they mean.
Enjoy.

Join the effort to unravel AIDS/HIV, unfold Proteomes, fight Cancer,
compare Fiocruz Genome and fight Muscular Dystrophy with Team EvC! (click)


we are limited in our ability to understand
by our ability to understand
RebelAAmericanOZen[Deist
... to learn ... to think ... to live ... to laugh ...
to share.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 26 by crashfrog, posted 06-07-2007 6:01 PM crashfrog has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 28 by crashfrog, posted 06-07-2007 7:11 PM RAZD has not replied

  
RAZD
Member (Idle past 1430 days)
Posts: 20714
From: the other end of the sidewalk
Joined: 03-14-2004


Message 33 of 69 (405491)
06-13-2007 6:32 AM
Reply to: Message 32 by bluegenes
06-13-2007 5:35 AM


Re: Religion results from experience
You might be interested in the link drawn in this article
Political and Social Science
between schizophrenia and religion
quote:
The engine by which mystical ideation becomes cultural doctrine includes three primary components: insanity, evil, and feebleness of mind. The insanity is embodied principally by schizophrenics, though also by individuals with certain other types of brain disease. The evil is embodied by the power lusting second hander. The feebleness of mind is embodied by ordinary people, of ordinary mental fortitude and ordinary susceptibility to memetic infection. By mental fortitude, I mean capacity to maintain rational consistency, particularly when presented with a concerted effort to befuddle.
The ancients also had lots of stories of seers ... usually holed up and being kept.
There is also this article
Page not found -
quote:
In the new field of "neurotheology," scientists seek the
biological basis of spirituality. Is God all in our heads?
Which leads to the interesting question of whether there is a "religion gene" .... and what to do about it (versus, say, a "homosexual gene" ... )
Enjoy.

Join the effort to unravel AIDS/HIV, unfold Proteomes, fight Cancer,
compare Fiocruz Genome and fight Muscular Dystrophy with Team EvC! (click)


we are limited in our ability to understand
by our ability to understand
RebelAAmericanOZen[Deist
... to learn ... to think ... to live ... to laugh ...
to share.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 32 by bluegenes, posted 06-13-2007 5:35 AM bluegenes has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 34 by bluegenes, posted 06-13-2007 8:15 AM RAZD has replied

  
RAZD
Member (Idle past 1430 days)
Posts: 20714
From: the other end of the sidewalk
Joined: 03-14-2004


Message 35 of 69 (405499)
06-13-2007 8:29 AM
Reply to: Message 34 by bluegenes
06-13-2007 8:15 AM


Re: Religion results from experience
The suggestion that the seers, prophets and visionaries of all religions, the invententors and perpetuators of religions, may well have been epeleptics and schizophrenics is frequently made, and I suspect that the idea may be as old as religion itself.
There is also the issue of the "God-Helmet"
Holy visions
quote:
He built a Transcranial Magnetic Stimulator, starting with a yellow motorcycle helmet, and outfitted it with build-in electrical coils that can create electromagnetic fields in the wearer's temporal lobes. These are the part of the brain which are linked to religious belief, "time distortions, dream states and assorted odd physic phenomena." 5 During an experiment, the subject sits in a quiet, dimly lit, room. Soothing music is played in the background. A "gently flickering strobe light" is provided. The subject's brain wave patterns are monitored by an EEG instrument.
By 2002, he had performed the experiment on over 1,000 volunteers. 80% had some sort of supernatural experience ...
What "sort" is not discussed.
In fact, the "you're crazy" brigade actually win out in the overwhelming majority of cases, but if the madman is charismatic and not too obviously crazy, and perhaps in the right time and place where there's public dissatisfaction and desire for something new, then a major or minor prophet can be born.
And the rules of statistics would say that given sufficient opportunity that this would occur. Of course it is more likely to occur in ignorant\gullible populations versus educated\skeptical ones.
Enjoy.

Join the effort to unravel AIDS/HIV, unfold Proteomes, fight Cancer,
compare Fiocruz Genome and fight Muscular Dystrophy with Team EvC! (click)


we are limited in our ability to understand
by our ability to understand
RebelAAmericanOZen[Deist
... to learn ... to think ... to live ... to laugh ...
to share.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 34 by bluegenes, posted 06-13-2007 8:15 AM bluegenes has not replied

  
RAZD
Member (Idle past 1430 days)
Posts: 20714
From: the other end of the sidewalk
Joined: 03-14-2004


Message 44 of 69 (406777)
06-22-2007 10:42 AM
Reply to: Message 42 by ringo
06-21-2007 8:02 PM


Re: Why religion or beleif in God
Do we know for sure that Neanderthals didn't burn some of their dead ...
Would this not be evidence of some form of treatment of the dead? Ritual is ritual, and there is evidence of cremation also being used by those that built stonehenge as part of their rituals.
The only thing that would not be ritualistic would be leaving the body where it died, untouched.
It doesn't have to deal with belief in gods, it can be spirits, especially of the dead or of ancestors (as occurs in many societies).
Enjoy.

Join the effort to unravel AIDS/HIV, unfold Proteomes, fight Cancer,
compare Fiocruz Genome and fight Muscular Dystrophy with Team EvC! (click)


we are limited in our ability to understand
by our ability to understand
RebelAAmericanOZen[Deist
... to learn ... to think ... to live ... to laugh ...
to share.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 42 by ringo, posted 06-21-2007 8:02 PM ringo has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 46 by ringo, posted 06-22-2007 11:09 AM RAZD has replied

  
RAZD
Member (Idle past 1430 days)
Posts: 20714
From: the other end of the sidewalk
Joined: 03-14-2004


Message 50 of 69 (406811)
06-22-2007 2:21 PM
Reply to: Message 46 by ringo
06-22-2007 11:09 AM


Re: Why religion or beleif in God
We do that even if we don't have a specific belief in the "spirits" that we give lip service to.
I remember seeing a video of a chimp mom where the baby died, and she carried the dead body around for days afterwards. Obviously in mourning and denial. Being able to have a ceremony to bring peace may have positive benefits for the whole group.

Join the effort to unravel AIDS/HIV, unfold Proteomes, fight Cancer,
compare Fiocruz Genome and fight Muscular Dystrophy with Team EvC! (click)


we are limited in our ability to understand
by our ability to understand
RebelAAmericanOZen[Deist
... to learn ... to think ... to live ... to laugh ...
to share.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 46 by ringo, posted 06-22-2007 11:09 AM ringo has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 53 by New Cat's Eye, posted 06-22-2007 3:44 PM RAZD has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024