Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,423 Year: 3,680/9,624 Month: 551/974 Week: 164/276 Day: 4/34 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Why It Is Right To Do Good To Others
purpledawn
Member (Idle past 3479 days)
Posts: 4453
From: Indiana
Joined: 04-25-2004


Message 35 of 304 (404344)
06-08-2007 7:28 AM
Reply to: Message 34 by Jon
06-08-2007 1:47 AM


Why it is Right?
The thread is essentially about why it is right to do good to others. It isn't about actually deeming what specific actions are good or what individual actions are right, but generally why it is right to do good to others (individuals}.
What is good changes through the ages, so it doesn't matter what is deemed good right now.
I think JavaMan was on the right path in Message 23.
JavaMan writes:
What is morality when we get down to it, apart from the rules we use to regulate our behaviour towards one another? And why do we need to regulate our behaviour? So that I can get on with pursuing the things I want to do, and you can get on with the things you want to do.
I'd argue that there's nothing more to morality than that. If I increase your pain or reduce your happiness, I'm acting immorally; conversely, if I reduce your pain or increase your happiness, I'm acting morally.
Doing "good" to someone else is generally considered a positive action and not a harmful action.
In the OP Stile gives his definition of what it means to do good to others.
Stile writes:
Good is increasing the positive inner-feelings of another being.
So explain what your hypothetical Amazon situation below has to do with individuals?
Jon writes:
If cutting down every tree in the Amazon increased the positive inner-feelings (PIF) points of the world more so than it decreased them”i.e., there is a net increase”, would it be right to cut down every tree in the Amazon? Would deforestation then be a good thing?
As an individual, I'm not going to be cutting down every tree in the Amazon, so the hypothetical situation is useless in this discussion.
In the dictionary meaning of good (noun) we see the meaning: advancement of prosperity or well-being which follows with the OP definition. There are other meanings to the noun form, but his definition is valid.
So what is your argument? Is it right to do good to others or not?

"Peshat is what I say and derash is what you say." --Nehama Leibowitz

This message is a reply to:
 Message 34 by Jon, posted 06-08-2007 1:47 AM Jon has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 47 by Stile, posted 06-08-2007 4:08 PM purpledawn has replied

  
purpledawn
Member (Idle past 3479 days)
Posts: 4453
From: Indiana
Joined: 04-25-2004


Message 39 of 304 (404353)
06-08-2007 8:48 AM
Reply to: Message 36 by ikabod
06-08-2007 7:30 AM


General Good
quote:
.and so you open the door letting the bomber and his bomb hidden in the box into the building
you seem to keep missing the point .. we are not equipped to tell what is a good act, we can only do what we "think" is right at the time.
Doesn't matter. The act of opening a door for someone is generally considered good because it is helpful. It doesn't matter if the person going through the door has bad intentions.
There are things in our society that are generally accepted as good actions. Opening the door for others, giving up one's seat to the elderly or pregnant, saving someone's life, etc. It doesn't matter if the people we help have bad intentions later or were worth the effort.
I think it is considered right to do good actions because the thought is that positive actions can have a positive effect on others as well as ourselves.
In the unlikely chance that the person one opens the door for may have a box with a bomb in it, there is also the chance that the positive action of opening the door could possibly change the person's negative intent.

"Peshat is what I say and derash is what you say." --Nehama Leibowitz

This message is a reply to:
 Message 36 by ikabod, posted 06-08-2007 7:30 AM ikabod has not replied

  
purpledawn
Member (Idle past 3479 days)
Posts: 4453
From: Indiana
Joined: 04-25-2004


Message 51 of 304 (404419)
06-08-2007 7:26 PM
Reply to: Message 47 by Stile
06-08-2007 4:08 PM


Re: Why it is Right?
quote:
Yes. I'm also interested in any other definitions of what it means to do good to others. Would you have another? I'm very interested in gaining new insights on this area, it may help me to become a better person.
Per Merriam-Webster the advancement of prosperity or well-being (the good of the community) (it's for your own good) is a more general meaning of the noun form of good. There is also - something useful or beneficial.
I don't feel that your definition: Good is increasing the positive inner-feelings of another being is really a definition of good. An action that increases the positive inner-feelings of another being would be considered good, but I don't see it as a definition of good.
Even though we now have a noun form of the word, good is a descriptive word not a thing.

"Peshat is what I say and derash is what you say." --Nehama Leibowitz

This message is a reply to:
 Message 47 by Stile, posted 06-08-2007 4:08 PM Stile has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 76 by Stile, posted 06-11-2007 1:12 PM purpledawn has not replied

  
purpledawn
Member (Idle past 3479 days)
Posts: 4453
From: Indiana
Joined: 04-25-2004


Message 53 of 304 (404701)
06-09-2007 7:02 AM
Reply to: Message 52 by pelican
06-08-2007 7:57 PM


Good and Bad not the Issue
quote:
Is it possible this notion of good and bad is merely a tool to control the masses?
Not the issue of this topic. Getting past all the misdirection it is about why it is right to do good to others. IOW, why does society or an individual consider it right to do good to others?
Doing "good" to someone else is generally considered a positive action and not a harmful action.
Since humans tend to feel that violence begets violence, they also tend to feel that positive actions beget positive responses. I feel that is why humans consider it right to do "good" to others.

"Peshat is what I say and derash is what you say." --Nehama Leibowitz

This message is a reply to:
 Message 52 by pelican, posted 06-08-2007 7:57 PM pelican has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 54 by Grizz, posted 06-09-2007 5:52 PM purpledawn has not replied
 Message 68 by pelican, posted 06-10-2007 9:09 PM purpledawn has replied

  
purpledawn
Member (Idle past 3479 days)
Posts: 4453
From: Indiana
Joined: 04-25-2004


Message 61 of 304 (404849)
06-10-2007 6:16 AM
Reply to: Message 56 by ICANT
06-09-2007 7:50 PM


Still no Answer
quote:
It could be better said, "If there is no God with punishment for not being good, "Why bother"?
This thread isn't about being good. It is about why it is right to do good to others. Even in Luke (6:33) it acknowledges that sinners do good to those who do good to them.
So why do societies accept that it is right to do good to others?
Would you say that societies that don't believe in a god that punishes don't allow their people to do good to one another?

"Peshat is what I say and derash is what you say." --Nehama Leibowitz

This message is a reply to:
 Message 56 by ICANT, posted 06-09-2007 7:50 PM ICANT has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 62 by ICANT, posted 06-10-2007 2:27 PM purpledawn has replied
 Message 70 by anastasia, posted 06-11-2007 1:29 AM purpledawn has not replied

  
purpledawn
Member (Idle past 3479 days)
Posts: 4453
From: Indiana
Joined: 04-25-2004


Message 63 of 304 (404915)
06-10-2007 2:52 PM
Reply to: Message 62 by ICANT
06-10-2007 2:27 PM


Re: Still no Answer
Unfortunately that really doesn't answer my question. Let me rephrase it. Do you know of any society that deems it wrong to do good (that which the society accepts as good) to one another? If not, then why is it deemed right?
quote:
I try to do good because the Bible teaches me that I should be good. Love thy neighbor as thyself. The government has made some laws that entice me to be good.
It also doesn't matter why we each decide to do good, but more to why society allows us to do good.
Why is it considered right to do good to others?

"Peshat is what I say and derash is what you say." --Nehama Leibowitz

This message is a reply to:
 Message 62 by ICANT, posted 06-10-2007 2:27 PM ICANT has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 64 by ICANT, posted 06-10-2007 3:57 PM purpledawn has replied

  
purpledawn
Member (Idle past 3479 days)
Posts: 4453
From: Indiana
Joined: 04-25-2004


Message 65 of 304 (404927)
06-10-2007 5:19 PM
Reply to: Message 64 by ICANT
06-10-2007 3:57 PM


Re: Still no Answer
I don't know that I would consider them a society. They are more a belief system.
Well going along with #7 are The Eleven Satanic Rules of the Earth.
1. Do not give opinions or advice unless you are asked.
2. Do not tell your troubles to others unless you are sure they want to hear them.
3. When in another’s lair, show him respect or else do not go there.
5. Do not make sexual advances unless you are given the mating signal.
6. Do not take that which does not belong to you unless it is a burden to the other person and he cries out to be relieved.
8. Do not complain about anything to which you need not subject yourself.
9. Do not harm little children.
10. Do not kill non-human animals unless you are attacked or for your food.
And given this statement from Satanism 101,
You’ve seen us on the streets. I rode the bike right next to you in the gym today. I’m that guy you cut in front of in traffic. I held the door open for your wife and kids going into the market too.
I'd say they probably follow the same general concept of what are good actions as the general population (U.S.). In fact, my mother's preacher gave a class on satanism and said they don't believe in Satan and don't want bad/misbehaving people in their ranks.
I don't see that they would consider it wrong to do what they deem to be good actions.
As I said in Message 53: Since humans tend to feel that violence begets violence, they also tend to feel that positive actions beget positive responses. I feel that is why humans consider it right to do "good" to others.
I think Grizz also made a good point in Message 54.
Grizz writes:
Along these lines we do good to others because not to do so would bring about a negative mental experience in most individuals- guilt, shame, sadness. We have empathy and can associate with the plight of fellow beings. To ignore the plight leads to guilt.

"Peshat is what I say and derash is what you say." --Nehama Leibowitz

This message is a reply to:
 Message 64 by ICANT, posted 06-10-2007 3:57 PM ICANT has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 67 by jar, posted 06-10-2007 7:26 PM purpledawn has not replied

  
purpledawn
Member (Idle past 3479 days)
Posts: 4453
From: Indiana
Joined: 04-25-2004


Message 72 of 304 (405081)
06-11-2007 7:14 AM
Reply to: Message 68 by pelican
06-10-2007 9:09 PM


Re: Good and Bad not the Issue
quote:
How can one know if one is doing good or being good if one does not know what good is? How can one know if one is doing bad or being bad if one does not know what bad is?
Good is a descriptive word and we know what the definition of good is. As I've said before, what is or isn't good changes with time, so it doesn't matter in this discussion what specific actions are considered good or the motives behind them.
The point is why does society consider it acceptable to do good to others?
The religious person says it is right because god deems it as right.
Why does the secular person accept that doing good to others is right?
I think humans have found that violence begets violence and that positive actions beget positive responses. I feel that is why humans consider it right to do "good" to others. Some religions attribute this knowledge to God.
quote:
Is it a case of put your money where your mouth is here?
Not sure what you are referring to. You'll have to clarify.

"Peshat is what I say and derash is what you say." --Nehama Leibowitz

This message is a reply to:
 Message 68 by pelican, posted 06-10-2007 9:09 PM pelican has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 73 by pelican, posted 06-11-2007 10:01 AM purpledawn has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024