|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
EvC Forum active members: 66 (9164 total) |
| |
ChatGPT | |
Total: 916,475 Year: 3,732/9,624 Month: 603/974 Week: 216/276 Day: 56/34 Hour: 2/2 |
Thread ▼ Details |
|
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: Creationism museum opens in Alberta | |||||||||||||||||||||||
RAZD Member (Idle past 1427 days) Posts: 20714 From: the other end of the sidewalk Joined: |
Presumably you give equal recommendations for UFO museums?
http://www.roswellufomuseum.com/ the bigfoot museum?http://www.bigfootmuseum.com/ Museums for lake monsters?http://www.worldhop.com/Journals/J11/PAGES/Magic.html http://sunnyokanagan.com/ogopogo/ and anything else that fits the faith category of knowledge... with no critical review for any actual facts. Enjoy. compare Fiocruz Genome and fight Muscular Dystrophy with Team EvC! (click) we are limited in our ability to understand by our ability to understand RebelAAmericanOZen[Deist ... to learn ... to think ... to live ... to laugh ... to share.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
RAZD Member (Idle past 1427 days) Posts: 20714 From: the other end of the sidewalk Joined: |
Well, don't get too cocky, after all, how many facts does man have the power to review, or even access to?? Enough to know that the earth is old, way older than is presented in this museum as fact or true. That alone means that this museum is LYING about the truth, which should be one reason sufficient to stay away from it. If you want to argue this point I suggest you visit Age Correlations and an Old Earth: Version 1 No 3 (formerly Part III), read the first post and start posting comments there. I'll bet you bail before you finish with the evidence and the correlations in that thread. There is arrogance born of knowledge and arrogance born of ignorance: shall we see who has which? Enjoy. compare Fiocruz Genome and fight Muscular Dystrophy with Team EvC! (click) we are limited in our ability to understand by our ability to understand RebelAAmericanOZen[Deist ... to learn ... to think ... to live ... to laugh ... to share.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
RAZD Member (Idle past 1427 days) Posts: 20714 From: the other end of the sidewalk Joined: |
Message 101
No worries, I am aware of the limitations of this part of the forum, and plan to act accordingly. Message 102 (I will remind people that I wanted this in the coffee house, someone bumped it here, don't blame me) whatever, Keys
This is some of the biblical related content to what is in the museum. So that is part of the dioramas used to portray parts of the bible: where is the scientific evidence that says it could be possible? Where is the scientific evidence in this museum or is it all make believe interpretations of the bible? If the later then it is more related to an amusement park than a museum. Enjoy. compare Fiocruz Genome and fight Muscular Dystrophy with Team EvC! (click) we are limited in our ability to understand by our ability to understand RebelAAmericanOZen[Deist ... to learn ... to think ... to live ... to laugh ... to share.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
RAZD Member (Idle past 1427 days) Posts: 20714 From: the other end of the sidewalk Joined: |
OK, so, are you suggesting that the more important aspects of what the creation museum covers, that are not limitable to science somehow should not have been bumped here?? Let's start with the scientific stuff: if what the museum shows in these catagories are lies then the museum cannot be trusted as a valid source of information -- no matter what the subject is. The museum states that the earth is young: this is a lie.The museum states that the grand canyon was formed by the flood: this is a lie. The museum states that T.rex was a herbivore at some time: this is a lie. Therefore the museum cannot be trusted as a source of truth. You are better off going elsewhere for your "more important aspects" to places that respect the truth. Enjoy. compare Fiocruz Genome and fight Muscular Dystrophy with Team EvC! (click) we are limited in our ability to understand by our ability to understand RebelAAmericanOZen[Deist ... to learn ... to think ... to live ... to laugh ... to share.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
RAZD Member (Idle past 1427 days) Posts: 20714 From: the other end of the sidewalk Joined: |
You have access to no such facts. Care to back that up on the Age Correlations and an Old Earth: Version 1 No 3 (formerly Part III) regarding the age of the earth? Care to back that up on the Exploring the Grand Canyon, from the bottom up. regarding the formation of the grand canyon? Care to anything than make assertions? Enjoy. compare Fiocruz Genome and fight Muscular Dystrophy with Team EvC! (click) we are limited in our ability to understand by our ability to understand RebelAAmericanOZen[Deist ... to learn ... to think ... to live ... to laugh ... to share.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
RAZD Member (Idle past 1427 days) Posts: 20714 From: the other end of the sidewalk Joined: |
Message 119 Care to stop advertising other thread? I have NO interest in what you want to define as science, or posting in a kangaroo court set up I feel is extremely biased. Whatever. What you really have is nothing but attitude. Certainly no argument.
No, let's not. The more important part of creation museums is God, and miracles, and things of a spirit nature. Let us start there. It's my thread, I set the rules. Maybe I should bump it to faith and belief. In other words you are scared of the truth and like to have your particular faith catered to by any unscrupulous cad. No matter what it costs you. Certainly you don't need to discuss this pathetic excuse for a museum to talk about those other issues, and at least then you can base it on a better foundation. Quite your whining and grow an integrity meter. "Faith and Belief" forum would still mean that you should still deal with honesty and integrety. Enjoy. Edited by RAZD, : F&B Forum compare Fiocruz Genome and fight Muscular Dystrophy with Team EvC! (click) we are limited in our ability to understand by our ability to understand RebelAAmericanOZen[Deist ... to learn ... to think ... to live ... to laugh ... to share.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
RAZD Member (Idle past 1427 days) Posts: 20714 From: the other end of the sidewalk Joined: |
Don’t forget The First Church of Evolution http://www.fcefaith.org they got faith too. This has already been refuted in Message 167 An honest debater would answer that post rather than repeat the same falsified assertion. A person who learns things doesn't repeat mistakes. You are 6 posts close to a suspension, IMH(ysa)O. This appears to be your biggest canon, and it's a derringer loaded with blanks. Enjoy. Edited by RAZD, : canon fodder Edited by RAZD, : . compare Fiocruz Genome and fight Muscular Dystrophy with Team EvC! (click) we are limited in our ability to understand by our ability to understand RebelAAmericanOZen[Deist ... to learn ... to think ... to live ... to laugh ... to share.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
RAZD Member (Idle past 1427 days) Posts: 20714 From: the other end of the sidewalk Joined: |
We'll start with the easy stuff:
The "Methusulah" specimen (estimated germination 2832 BC) was cut down in 1957, so by this one tree alone the minimum age for the earth is 4,839 years (in 2007 ... and counting). See 'Wikipedia: Methuselah Tree" for additional information on this one tree. Methuselah (tree) - Wikipedia Note: this also means that there was no WW flood in those 4,839 years, as it was still living. Now either we agree that this is so, based as it is on solid evidence and documented as fact, or we agree that you prefer to be deluded:
Your insults mean nothing,... Statements of facts are not insults. The museum is full of lies that have nothing to do with truth, no matter what you personally think.
There is no better foundation to base a museum on, that you can offer. Lies are no foundation for anything but disappointment. Enjoy. compare Fiocruz Genome and fight Muscular Dystrophy with Team EvC! (click) we are limited in our ability to understand by our ability to understand RebelAAmericanOZen[Deist ... to learn ... to think ... to live ... to laugh ... to share.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
RAZD Member (Idle past 1427 days) Posts: 20714 From: the other end of the sidewalk Joined: |
Now, can you show us where this tree is on display at these museums? This museum (a) talks about a world wide flood as reality and (b) talks about the age of the earth as 6,000 years as reality. This tree is the first part of the evidence that refutes, invalidates and falsifies those claims.
And lies are not something science can detect, ... False. Lies are detected by evidence that contradicts them, and science is particularly good at finding contradictory evidence to lies like this.
I could say the same of museums you might like. Of course you could assert that: you can assert anything. Your problem is substantiating your claim. Now the next bit:Prometheus (tree) - Wikipedia quote: That makes the minimum age of the earth (and the earliest date for a global flood) 4,900 years old. Ready to deal with the facts yet? Enjoy. compare Fiocruz Genome and fight Muscular Dystrophy with Team EvC! (click) we are limited in our ability to understand by our ability to understand RebelAAmericanOZen[Deist ... to learn ... to think ... to live ... to laugh ... to share.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
RAZD Member (Idle past 1427 days) Posts: 20714 From: the other end of the sidewalk Joined: |
So you admit this tree is not really related to the museum. OK. No, read again: it has to do with the age of the earth and the global flood parts of the displays.
I don't want to engage you in your claims on a science forum here, because it allows no freedom, and is biased. It allows the freedom of truth and reality as opposed to the shackles of ignorance, expecially when willfully donned.
The ability of science to detect anything is limited by what it's abilities to detect anything are. You like tautologies? Science increases it's ability to detect reality every year, as the walls of ignorance crumble. It is certainly able to detect that the earth is old, very old, at least 4.55 years old. Ability to detect the age of the earth older than that is limited by the limitations of evidence: this does not mean that what it can detect is not valid.
Actually that is very very easy to do, but not in the science forums here. That would be like playing with a stacked deck, and only half of it at that. Another unfounded bald assertion, sounds like a bluff to me.
It seems you are the one that is demonstrating an inability to do just that. The fact is, I am not going to debate science under your kangaroo court setup here. The fact also is that the exhibit I talked about, you have not addressed. Yet I am the only one of the two of us that has posted a single fact to substantiate their argument. I present evidence and you reject and deny it, so in that aspect it is a kangaroo court, just that you are the kangaroo jumping anywhere but where the evidence leads. The next bit: Dendrochronology - Wikipedia
quote: Dendroclimatology - Wikipedia
quote: From the two trees previously mentioned plus remnant pieces of dead wood surrounding them the chronology of the Bristle Cone Pines in the Sierra Nevada show an overall age of the earth of over 8500 years with no global flood possible in that time as all the sample overlapped periods of time when they were living. These trees also provide climate data in the rings, climate data that ensures the overlapped specimen are correctly alligned. Bottom line: a 6,000 year old earth that experienced a global flood within those 6,000 years is a falsified concept, invalidated by the evidence of one species of tree, one part of gods creation. Thus the claims of the museum are false the displays of age and global flood are lies. And we are again at the point where you either acknowledge the reality of the facts or you reject them in favor of denial, preferring delusions:
It's your choice: reality or delusion. {abe}I see you have your wish to move to Faith & Belief. Good. Now how about you doing more in participation debate wise than just repetitious bald assertions. If you insist on posting the same thing over and over there is no point in responding to a single post of yours. If that is what you want your thread to be, go ahead. If you are only interested in discussing the museum in the context of the bible then gosh: it shows what the bible says. Whoopeee. You could also talk about going to Church. I'm interested in discussing how you think this is anything valid when there are KNOWN LIES included as well. If you don't want to address that issue there is nothing for anyone to say to you that is not from the club of gullible easily deluded ignorant folk that will willingly part with their cash for any scam like this. I think you'll find it lonely your way. I see no reason to be a sounding board for someone who acts like a spoiled child.{/abe} Enjoy. Edited by RAZD, : abe compare Fiocruz Genome and fight Muscular Dystrophy with Team EvC! (click) we are limited in our ability to understand by our ability to understand RebelAAmericanOZen[Deist ... to learn ... to think ... to live ... to laugh ... to share.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
RAZD Member (Idle past 1427 days) Posts: 20714 From: the other end of the sidewalk Joined: |
4.5 years is not that old! (har har) What you think natural science can detect is interesting. How nice. So I dropped billion when I typed it - mea culpa. If this is the best of your argument, however it is a blank.
Well, OK, I see that you don't want to discuss the exhibits in the museums, but the concepts of creation/evolution in general. False. Read for comprehension.1 I want to discuss the evidence that invalidates, falsifies, renders wrong some of the exibits in the museum. The actual age of the earth is one. Consider this: it is easy to find evidence for a young earth in a very old one (all you have to do is look in the areas of new volcanic rocks etc) but it should be impossible to find evidence for an old earth in a very young one. This evidence exists.
Maybe you can address some of the facts of this thread. If we get a green light to go ballistic, and take off the gloves, and go 15 rounds, and have a free for all, why, maybe I can entertain the idea of taking you down a few pegs. Meanwhile, back on topic. Totally irrelevant. What I want to discuss is the evidence that invalidates, falsifies, renders wrong some of the exibits in the museum. If you want to make it a "great debate" so that it is only the two of us that is okay. The topic will be "Actual Age of the Earth Invalidates Creation Museum Displays on AGE and FLOOD". I'll present the evidence step by step and allow you a chance to refute it or show that it is wrong.
List 2 known lies in the museum, so we can see what you mean. (1) The age of the earth is 6000 years(2) The world wide flood occurred within that time or any close approximation You really must be having trouble with comprehension1 as I have listed these before. There are others (the grand canyon was formed by the flood), but these are sufficient for now. I'll even deal with these together if you care to play. Enjoy. 1 - in case you have trouble with comprehension of "comprehension:"
Edited by RAZD, : great debate compare Fiocruz Genome and fight Muscular Dystrophy with Team EvC! (click) we are limited in our ability to understand by our ability to understand RebelAAmericanOZen[Deist ... to learn ... to think ... to live ... to laugh ... to share.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
RAZD Member (Idle past 1427 days) Posts: 20714 From: the other end of the sidewalk Joined: |
You know, Razd, as much as I actually would like to do that, I am not yet confident of the fairness of the moderators here. If I was, I would take you out behind the woodshed in a heartbeat! This is in Faith & Belief forum, so you have the most lax level of criteria for providing substantiation and validation for your position.
Well perhaps sorting it out in order might be better. First, deal with the exhibits already raised first by me. I think the exhibits you mentioned probably did a good job of representing to stories as written in the bible, and I have no quibble with those, just as I have no real quibble with christianity in general. These exhibits would be good for non-YEC's as much as they are for YEC's. THus I'll give them a pass and move on to the ones that deal with YEC information -- ie the age of the earth and a literal flood concept -- which are not necessarily endorsed by all christians: fair enough? We can take it in easy steps. With breaks for you to reply and rebut on any of this evidence. What we'll be looking at is methods of counting annual layers in different systems, building up the age as we go. First up is the "Methusula Tree" Methuselah (tree) - Wikipedia
quote: Thus by this one tree alone the minimum age of the earth is 4839 years and during that time there was no WW Flood. This age is determined by counting the tree rings from bored core samples taken by Schulman in 1957. Any Comment so far? {ABE} The format we can use is like that of a trial: as "prosecutor" I present "witnessed" evidence, one by one, with time for you to "cross-examine" each one before going on to the next, then when I am done you can provide evidence in defense one by one, while I "cross-examine" followed by closing arguments. {/ABE} Enjoy Edited by RAZD, : pyot Edited by RAZD, : subtitle Edited by RAZD, : abe compare Fiocruz Genome and fight Muscular Dystrophy with Team EvC! (click) we are limited in our ability to understand by our ability to understand RebelAAmericanOZen[Deist ... to learn ... to think ... to live ... to laugh ... to share.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
RAZD Member (Idle past 1427 days) Posts: 20714 From: the other end of the sidewalk Joined: |
Keys,
This thread is nearing the point where it will be cut off (around 300 post limit to all threads) so I have proposed a new topic on just this element. If you want to keep it out of the science threads (you were pretty firm on the existing thread that it not be science forum) we can do a Great Debate on this or put it in Faith and Belief (with the original thread). Great Debate means just you and me on the thread, so there wouldn't be a lot of other people piling up on you. The purpose of the thread for me will to present evidence for the case that the age of the earth as portrayed in the museum is false and that a global flood could not have occurred withing that time (or any reasonable approximation), and for you to defend the age and flood occurrence as portrayed. The Proposed Creation Museum Age of the Earth is False will need to be promoted, so state your preference and we can get started. Enjoy. Edited by RAZD, : flood. subtitle Edited by RAZD, : . Edited by RAZD, : piling compare Fiocruz Genome and fight Muscular Dystrophy with Team EvC! (click) we are limited in our ability to understand by our ability to understand RebelAAmericanOZen[Deist ... to learn ... to think ... to live ... to laugh ... to share.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
RAZD Member (Idle past 1427 days) Posts: 20714 From: the other end of the sidewalk Joined: |
1) No interruptions, till the thread reaches at least 301 post, without a bunch of space wasting mod comments taking up 50 posts, or whatnot. 2) No suspensions, or bans, etc for the entire thread allowed. 3) An honest attempt to debate. I think we could agree to that under the great debate guidelines (moderation is usually a minimum there and there would be no other posters wasting space) with the caveat that one or the other of us could be suspended for behavior on another thread (I have been and likely will again ... ) - this will be mostly a quid pro quo posting so we'd have to wait for the other to respond anyway. Enjoy. compare Fiocruz Genome and fight Muscular Dystrophy with Team EvC! (click) we are limited in our ability to understand by our ability to understand RebelAAmericanOZen[Deist ... to learn ... to think ... to live ... to laugh ... to share.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
RAZD Member (Idle past 1427 days) Posts: 20714 From: the other end of the sidewalk Joined: |
Ready to go then see Message 270
Since the topic would be broad, no need to limit it to museums. More of an age of the earth, and limits of science type thing. Sure we can keep going once the age in the museum has been shown to be a false representation and that no flood occurred in that time frame or what is reasonably similar. See you there. compare Fiocruz Genome and fight Muscular Dystrophy with Team EvC! (click) we are limited in our ability to understand by our ability to understand RebelAAmericanOZen[Deist ... to learn ... to think ... to live ... to laugh ... to share.
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024