Creationism museum opens in Alberta

We know because we know and you don't know because you don't know!Well.
keys.
You done gone an did it.
You done whupped me.
You done took me out t th woodshed.keys: "God exists!"
molbiogirl: "Show me."
keys: "Because I said so!"keys: "Jesus rose from the dead!"
molbiogirl: "Show me."
keys: "Because I said so!"keys: "The flood happened!"
molbiogirl: "Show me."
keys: "Because I said so!"Evidence, keys!
Still waiting on that evidence!

Number 8!
Ladies and gentleman!
We have number 8! C'mon keys!
I know you can do it!
Just 26 more to go!Ev-i-dence!
Ev-i-dence!

Au contraire, mon frere!To wit: Let's review that quote again, shall we? I'm from Missouri.
Show me.

[whispers] I know! But when it suits his fancy ... ... he tries to play too! Isn't that just adorable? [/whispers][whispers] But, you see, what he doesn't realize is ... ... it's an imaginary crime! [/whispers]Edited by molbiogirl, : No reason given.

[sigh] How soon they forget.This evidence. Au contraire, mon frere!To wit: Let's review that quote again, shall we? I'm from Missouri.
Show me.

You said you had evidence god exists.
I am asking to see it.You said you had evidence jebus rose from the dead.
I am asking to see it.

As Nosy said: And as our admin director said: This conversation isn't making progress.To make things easier for you, I offer you a list of "evidences" you have yet to provide: Now, may I remind you, on more than one occasion you have [willfully?] chosen to contradict yourself:Example #1 Example #2 So. As you compose your answer, consider this:You have offered nothing beyond the 6 bare assertions listed above. You are blocking the progress of this discussion. In order to move forward, I suggest you pick one or two of the "evidences" from that list and elaborate.Over the past couple of days, several people have pointed this out to you, but I think it bears repeating: Just because I said so is NOT evidence.To use Rahvin's analogy, just because I say there's a pink unicorn on my shoulder doesn't make it so.Just because someone says they saw a ghost doesn't make it so.
Just because someone says they saw an angel doesn't make it so.
Just because someone says the flood occurred doesn't make it so.
Just because someone says jebus rose from the dead doesn't make it so.
Just because someone says there are miracles doesn't make it so.
Just because someone says the bible is literally true doesn't make it so.

OK. Good. A place to start.Repeating your bare assertion, as you just did, as you have done too many times to count, is NOT evidence."We saw it."
Prove it.
"We documented it."
Prove it.Provide something, anything, as evidence to back up this "because I said so" claim.Use the museum. Use the bible. Use other historical references. Use something other than "because I said so".And don't say "Nuh-uh. You disprove it."YOU made the assertion. YOU are obligated to back it up.

Sorry!I might have misunderstood the admin director's suggestion: Perhaps defining "closely related topics" would be helpful.Or perhaps, as you say, we should refrain until keys comes up with some real substance.

Good luck, RAZD, Jaderis.I will eat my hat if keys answers your question, RAZD.
In all seriousness.
I will eat my hat.

bvcsm – My WordPress BlogI assert the following: The "evidence" offered in the 5 exhibits listed below is flawed and/or fictitious.1. In this display we deal with the geological column, the fossil sequence and profound evidence for a past, global flood such as the Quartzite boulders of the Cypress Hills in Alberta and Saskatchewan.2. The fantastic "Fossils and the Flood" display contains only genuine, museum quality fossils and a giant model of Noah's ark. Come find out why these fossils present profound evidence for the flood of Noah.3. The "Dinosaurs and Humans" display shows considerable evidence that not only did dinosaurs exist recently, but that humans existed with them.4. The interactive bacterial flagellum and DNA displays both provide compelling evidence for creation and refute any unguided, 'natural' processes such as evolution.5. The "Evidence From Geneaology" display, donated by Edgar Nurnberg, is one of the more favourite displays of our visitors. These scrolls from the Lambeth Palace in England trace the geneaology of King Henry the 6th back to Adam and Eve.Furthermore, I assert the following: The "evidence" offered in the 2 videos listed below is flawed and/or fictitious.Click here (Page not found – bvcsm) to view the multimedia video on the flagellum or click here (Page not found – bvcsm) to view the multimedia video on DNA and information.As with RAZD and the flood (Message 244), I too will take it in easy steps ... with breaks for you to reply and rebut any of the evidence.Let's start with Item #1. The geologic column.The YEC POVFrom CHINAPISSING偷窥女WC,白俄罗斯18VIDEOS极品,精品国产乱子伦一区二区三区,日本JAPANESE熟睡人妻 and http://www.answersingenesis.org/tj/v14/i1/fossil.asp"The geologic column is an idea, not an actual series of rock layers. Nowhere do we find the complete sequence."Wrong.The entire geologic column is found in 25 basins around the world, piled up in proper order. These basins are:* The Ghadames Basin in Libya
* The Beni Mellal Basin in Morrocco
* The Tunisian Basin in Tunisia
* The Oman Interior Basin in Oman
* The Western Desert Basin in Egypt
* The Adana Basin in Turkey
* The Iskenderun Basin in Turkey
* The Moesian Platform in Bulgaria
* The Carpathian Basin in Poland
* The Baltic Basin in the USSR
* The Yeniseiy-Khatanga Basin in the USSR
* The Farah Basin in Afghanistan
* The Helmand Basin in Afghanistan
* The Yazd-Kerman-Tabas Basin in Iran
* The Manhai-Subei Basin in China
* The Jiuxi Basin China
* The Tung t'in - Yuan Shui Basin China
* The Tarim Basin China
* The Szechwan Basin China
* The Yukon-Porcupine Province Alaska
* The Williston Basin in North Dakota
* The Tampico Embayment Mexico
* The Bogata Basin Colombia
* The Bonaparte Basin, Australia
* The Beaufort Sea Basin/McKenzie River DeltaFrom http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/geocolumnCare to comment, keys?

Wow, Mod. Great job!You know, I've been reading all the really long threads on EvC over the past few weeks and I've gotta say ... I've never seen this approach before.Excellent!

We? Surely you weren't there. You missed the point. You can't offer evidence of an alien abduction. Nor can you offer evidence (or are unwilling to offer evidence) of god. You didn't answer the question.How do YOU tell the difference between that which is well founded and that which is not? Do you? And witches too (per your holy book)? You didn't answer the question.Do you believe that LDS and Voudou are legitimate? That is to say, just as legit as xianity. So, am I to understand you have no opinion on the spiritual beliefs of 67% of humanity? You do not think that jebus is the one and only true way? I gotta go with Iceage on this one. Petty sort, that god of yours.

Yup. I'm tired of you too.Ciao bella.