Understanding through Discussion

Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 81 (8950 total)
48 online now:
DrJones*, Hyroglyphx, Theodoric (3 members, 45 visitors)
Newest Member: Mikee
Post Volume: Total: 867,373 Year: 22,409/19,786 Month: 972/1,834 Week: 42/430 Day: 42/63 Hour: 0/3

Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Author Topic:   Discussion of John MacKay's Views
Posts: 3911
Joined: 09-26-2002

Message 76 of 77 (406437)
06-20-2007 12:10 AM
Reply to: Message 62 by subbie
06-19-2007 4:36 PM

Philip Johnson vs. Philip Kitcher has been spun off to being its own topic
Online (via email) Philip Johnson vs. Philip Kitcher debate.

Please bring your comments to that topic.


New Members should start HERE to get an understanding of what makes great posts.

Comments on moderation procedures (or wish to respond to admin messages)? - Go to:
General discussion of moderation procedures
Thread Reopen Requests
Considerations of topic promotions from the "Proposed New Topics" forum

Other useful links:

Forum Guidelines, Style Guides for EvC, Assistance w/ Forum Formatting, Proposed New (Great Debate) Topics, Official Invitations to Online Chat@EvC

Admin writes:

It really helps moderators figure out if a topic is disintegrating because of general misbehavior versus someone in particular if the originally non-misbehaving members kept it that way. When everyone is prickly and argumentative and off-topic and personal then it's just too difficult to tell. We have neither infinite time to untie the Gordian knot, nor the wisdom of Solomon.

There used to be a comedian who presented his ideas for a better world, and one of them was to arm everyone on the highway with little rubber dart guns. Every time you see a driver doing something stupid, you fire a little dart at his car. When a state trooper sees someone driving down the highway with a bunch of darts all over his car he pulls him over for being an idiot.

Please make it easy to tell you apart from the idiots. Source

This message is a reply to:
 Message 62 by subbie, posted 06-19-2007 4:36 PM subbie has not yet responded

Member (Idle past 1636 days)
Posts: 5069
From: Zerus
Joined: 07-18-2006

Message 77 of 77 (406496)
06-20-2007 4:06 PM
Reply to: Message 75 by Dr Adequate
06-19-2007 11:39 PM

Re: That Was Odd, Yes ...
edited... look at adminmoose's message

Edited by Tazmanian Devil, : No reason given.


Occasionally, owing to the deficiency of the English language, I have used he/him/his meaning he or she/him or her/his or her in order to avoid awkwardness of style.

He, him, and his are not intended as exclusively masculine pronouns. They may refer to either sex or to both sexes![/size]

This message is a reply to:
 Message 75 by Dr Adequate, posted 06-19-2007 11:39 PM Dr Adequate has not yet responded

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:

Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.0 Beta
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2019