Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,832 Year: 4,089/9,624 Month: 960/974 Week: 287/286 Day: 8/40 Hour: 0/4


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Why, if god limited man's life to 120 years, did people live longer?
AdminPD
Inactive Administrator


Message 91 of 230 (375296)
01-08-2007 9:57 AM
Reply to: Message 89 by 3fojurky
01-08-2007 9:33 AM


Reply Button
3fojurky,
When replying to a post, please use the reply button at the bottom right of the post you are responding to. If you are not replying to anyone specific, then use the general reply button. This makes the discussion easier to follow.
I do need a response to Message 83 and your double registration so I can get that taken care of.
Thanks
AdminPD

This message is a reply to:
 Message 89 by 3fojurky, posted 01-08-2007 9:33 AM 3fojurky has not replied

  
ringo
Member (Idle past 439 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


Message 92 of 230 (375374)
01-08-2007 1:22 PM
Reply to: Message 89 by 3fojurky
01-08-2007 9:33 AM


Re: Welcome To EvC
3fojurky writes:
... we don`t have KJVs here, just poorly done translations where Jesus is called "the Servant of God", rather than the Son of God, where there is no 1. John 5:7 which clearly says Jesus is God etc etc...
How do you determine which translations are "poorly done"? It sounds like you're choosing the KJV as "correct" because it tells you what you want to hear - e.g. that "Jesus is God". How do you know that the other translations aren't more accurate?

Help scientific research in your spare time. No cost. No obligation.
Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC

This message is a reply to:
 Message 89 by 3fojurky, posted 01-08-2007 9:33 AM 3fojurky has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 93 by 3fojurky, posted 01-13-2007 5:15 PM ringo has replied

  
3fojurky
Inactive Member


Message 93 of 230 (376765)
01-13-2007 5:15 PM
Reply to: Message 92 by ringo
01-08-2007 1:22 PM


Re: Welcome To EvC
That`s the Holy Spirit issue, which can`t be debated with the unbeliever..not that I`m accusing you.
Edited by 3fojurky, : misspelling

This message is a reply to:
 Message 92 by ringo, posted 01-08-2007 1:22 PM ringo has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 94 by crashfrog, posted 01-13-2007 5:17 PM 3fojurky has not replied
 Message 95 by ringo, posted 01-13-2007 6:22 PM 3fojurky has not replied

  
crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1494 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003


Message 94 of 230 (376766)
01-13-2007 5:17 PM
Reply to: Message 93 by 3fojurky
01-13-2007 5:15 PM


Re: Welcome To EvC
How do you discern the difference between "Holy Spirit" and self-delusion?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 93 by 3fojurky, posted 01-13-2007 5:15 PM 3fojurky has not replied

  
ringo
Member (Idle past 439 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


Message 95 of 230 (376773)
01-13-2007 6:22 PM
Reply to: Message 93 by 3fojurky
01-13-2007 5:15 PM


Re: Welcome To EvC
3fojurky writes:
That`s the Holy Spirit issue, which can`t be debated with the unbeliever..not that I`m accusing you.
Okay, let's assume that I am a believer. Let's assume that I believe exactly the same as you do.
The only difference is that I don't understand how to determine which translations are "poorly done".
What do you tell a new believer about how to tell which translations are most accurate?

Help scientific research in your spare time. No cost. No obligation.
Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC

This message is a reply to:
 Message 93 by 3fojurky, posted 01-13-2007 5:15 PM 3fojurky has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 96 by AdminPD, posted 01-14-2007 7:15 AM ringo has not replied

  
AdminPD
Inactive Administrator


Message 96 of 230 (376888)
01-14-2007 7:15 AM
Reply to: Message 95 by ringo
01-13-2007 6:22 PM


Accurate Subtitles Please
The "Welcome to EvC" subtitle has worn out it's usefulness in your discussion.
Please make your subtitles fit your content.
Please direct any comments concerning this Admin msg to the Moderation Thread.
Any response in this thread will receive a 24 hour timeout.
Thank you Purple

This message is a reply to:
 Message 95 by ringo, posted 01-13-2007 6:22 PM ringo has not replied

  
Taz
Member (Idle past 3319 days)
Posts: 5069
From: Zerus
Joined: 07-18-2006


Message 97 of 230 (377378)
01-16-2007 2:28 PM


Closing time?
It has already been established that the passage in question was referring to the world wide flood that nearly wiped out mankind rather than referring to the lifespan of individuals.

AKA G.A.S.B.Y.
George Absolutely Stupid Bush the Younger

Replies to this message:
 Message 98 by arachnophilia, posted 01-16-2007 3:00 PM Taz has not replied

  
arachnophilia
Member (Idle past 1371 days)
Posts: 9069
From: god's waiting room
Joined: 05-21-2004


Message 98 of 230 (377391)
01-16-2007 3:00 PM
Reply to: Message 97 by Taz
01-16-2007 2:28 PM


Re: Closing time?
yes, i think that is the consensus between believers and non-believers here. i suggest the kjv-only-ist tangent this thread has derailed into be taken to another thread.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 97 by Taz, posted 01-16-2007 2:28 PM Taz has not replied

  
Juraikken
Member (Idle past 6215 days)
Posts: 82
From: Winnetka, CA
Joined: 11-13-2006


Message 99 of 230 (395289)
04-15-2007 10:23 PM


there is an odd difference in that verse than others. let me explain
Genesis 6:3
"an hundred and twenty years"(KJV)
this is what God said right before the flood
now look at how the ages are written
Genesis 11:12
"12And Arphaxad lived five and thirty years, and begat Salah:"(KJV)
now i see a difference between AGE of man and length of time. it says "five and thirty years" what does that mean?
i think that what God said in Genesis 6:3 was that MAN will live for another 120 years then he will cause the flood, because it says that Noah was 500 years old, when God said this, when the flood came noah was 600.
so about 100 years later the flood came, same as what God said? not quite, let me explain: God said that he would give man 120 years then he will judge them. now Genesis goes back and forth in Genesis 5 it ends with talking about how Noah had 3 kids. then in Genesis 6 it starts off explain how man multiplied bla bla and God saw that they were bad and then he sees Noah, and it explains how he has kids AGAIN. so im thinking heres how the chronology worked
noah was 480 when God said to himself "My spirit shall not always strive with man, for that he also is flesh: yet his days shall be an hundred and twenty years" then 20 years later Noah begets Shem, Ham, and Japeth. God speaks to Noah when he is 500 and it took Noah 100 years to build the Ark and explain to people about the flood. then when Noah was 600 Flood came. I THINK that is a good explanation on WHAT God meant according to the context structure.

Replies to this message:
 Message 100 by T Planck, posted 05-07-2007 1:08 AM Juraikken has not replied

  
T Planck
Junior Member (Idle past 6198 days)
Posts: 1
From: Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA
Joined: 05-07-2007


Message 100 of 230 (399627)
05-07-2007 1:08 AM
Reply to: Message 99 by Juraikken
04-15-2007 10:23 PM


Based on Genesis 6
Genesis 6:1-3 Reads:
"1.Now it came about that when men started to grow in numbers on the surface of the ground and daughters were born to them,
2. then the sons of the true God began to notice the daughters of men, that they were good-looking; and they went taking wives for themselves, namely, all whom they chose.
3. After that Jehovah (YWHW or JHVH in the original texts) said: "My spirit shall not act toward man indefinitely in that he is also flesh. Accordingly his days shall amount to a hundred and twenty years.""
Ignoring 1. and looking at 2.:
What the angels were doing was obviously unnatural. In accord with his sentence in 3. God was simply stopping the spread of the Nephlim. However, those "faithful" to him such as Sarah, Noah, and his family were an exception. Why would God limit them?
As found in Genesis 6:8: "But Noah found favor in the eyes of Jehovah." It seems that "Man" included those other than Noah and Sarah. It also seems that Noah, Sarah, and his family did not go under this category:
Genesis 6:5: "Consequently Jehovah saw that the badness of man was abundant in the earth and every inclination of the thoughts of his heart was only bad all the time."
There is also an explanation for why the average life span of humans slowly declined at time progressed. If there was a canopy of water covering the Earth, it would have prevented a lot of UV rays. This would prevent many problems stemming from the sun.
All scriptures above were copied from the "New World Translation of the Holy Scriptures" which goes almost 99.999% unaltered from the copies of the dead sea scrolls and other records of the Bible.
Edited by T Planck, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 99 by Juraikken, posted 04-15-2007 10:23 PM Juraikken has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 101 by Coragyps, posted 05-07-2007 6:28 AM T Planck has not replied
 Message 102 by AdminPD, posted 05-07-2007 6:34 AM T Planck has not replied

  
Coragyps
Member (Idle past 762 days)
Posts: 5553
From: Snyder, Texas, USA
Joined: 11-12-2002


Message 101 of 230 (399645)
05-07-2007 6:28 AM
Reply to: Message 100 by T Planck
05-07-2007 1:08 AM


Re: Based on Genesis 6
Hello, TPlanck, and welcome to EvC!
I've never seen a name given for Mrs Noah before - that's interesting that your translation has one.
If there was a canopy of water covering the Earth, it would have prevented a lot of UV rays.
We've been around this "vapor canopy" barn many times here, but I would like to point out that both oxygen and nitrogen absorb ultraviolet light better than water does. That's on an equal-weight basis, now, so if you want 50% of all our oceans as a "canopy," you may stop most of the UV, 'Course, you also trap all the heat then, too....

This message is a reply to:
 Message 100 by T Planck, posted 05-07-2007 1:08 AM T Planck has not replied

  
AdminPD
Inactive Administrator


Message 102 of 230 (399646)
05-07-2007 6:34 AM
Reply to: Message 100 by T Planck
05-07-2007 1:08 AM


Welcome to EvC
Welcome T Planck,
Glad you decided to add to our diversity. We have a wide variety of forums for your debating pleasure.
As members, we are guests on this board and as guests we are asked to put forth our best behavior. Please read the Forum Guidelines carefully and understand the wishes of our host. Abide by the Forum Guidelines and you will be a welcome addition.
In the purple signature box below, you'll find some links that will help make your journey here pleasant.
Please direct any questions or comments you may have to the Moderation Thread.
Again, welcome and fruitful debating. Purple

Usually, in a well-conducted debate, speakers are either emotionally uncommitted or can preserve sufficient detachment to maintain a coolly academic approach.-- Encyclopedia Brittanica, on debate

Links for comments on moderation procedures and/or responding to admin msgs:
  • General discussion of moderation procedures
  • Considerations of topic promotions from the "Proposed New Topics" forum
  • Thread Reopen Requests
  • Great Debate Proposals
    Helpful links for New Members:
    Forum Guidelines, [thread=-19,-112], [thread=-17,-45], and Practice Makes Perfect

  • This message is a reply to:
     Message 100 by T Planck, posted 05-07-2007 1:08 AM T Planck has not replied

      
    herrmann
    Junior Member (Idle past 6169 days)
    Posts: 11
    Joined: 05-22-2007


    Message 103 of 230 (401945)
    05-22-2007 8:50 PM
    Reply to: Message 1 by thestickman
    12-05-2002 10:00 AM


    I apoligize if this has allready been said,
    but in Genesis 6:3 (all quoes in KJV) "And the LORD said, My spirit shall not always strive with man, for that he also is flesh: yet his days shall be an hundred and twenty years. "
    The creation of Noah, along with his wife was mentioned before this. Sarah was not mentioned, but this does not matter because she married Noah, and the names are used for reference. Also, the statement quoted previously could be referimg to any period of time, as it is not mentioned when god said the statement.
    Furthermore, in congruence to the Flood Theory, Water evaporated in the sky ( as evident from Gen 1:7 "And God made the firmament, and divided the waters which were under the firmament from the waters which were above the firmament: and it was so. ") This could be cause to slow the penetration of UV rays, and thus extend the lifetime of the occupants of the planet earth. The quote Gen 6:3 could be referencing after the flood, when the earth would be in its final resting state (without much of the oceans in the sky)

    This message is a reply to:
     Message 1 by thestickman, posted 12-05-2002 10:00 AM thestickman has not replied

    Replies to this message:
     Message 118 by Lithodid-Man, posted 11-29-2007 3:38 PM herrmann has not replied

      
    shiloh
    Junior Member (Idle past 6143 days)
    Posts: 28
    Joined: 06-21-2007


    Message 104 of 230 (406543)
    06-21-2007 1:32 AM


    I am not sure what the problem is here. The context of Gen. 4-6 should be simple enough. The book of Gen. is outlined into 10 smaller books or genealogies or histories. Chapter 5 starts a new history (#2) hence "This is the book of the genealogy of Adam." In doing so it brings you from what was said before reguarding Creation and Adam to the focus of the new subject Adam and his descendants particularly Noah and the flood. The next history is the history of the sons of Noah and the events surrounding the Tower of Babel.
    God told Noah when he was 480 that he had given mankind 120 years until HE would destroy the world with the Flood. The reason was mans wickedness - culminating in the events reguarding the "bene elohim" or sons of God.
    Noah began to have his three sons when he was 500 and when he was 600 the flood came. This is not that difficult of a passage to exegete. It is not say man would from that point on live only 120 yrs (seeing Noahs sons lived longer than that) nor do we have to finagel it to mean an appoximate time. The truth is there for those who would seek in faith that the Word of the Living God is reliable and accurate in its details.
    Note: Methusalah; meaning (his death shall bring) lived the longest - 969 yrs old (hence Gods grace). He died the year that the flood came in the 600th year of Noah.

      
    carnutter23
    Junior Member (Idle past 6100 days)
    Posts: 1
    From: Enola.Pa.USA
    Joined: 08-12-2007


    Message 105 of 230 (415887)
    08-12-2007 7:31 PM
    Reply to: Message 1 by thestickman
    12-05-2002 10:00 AM


    In the bible it says that a thousand years are as a day and a day as a thousand years. If you take this literally it would be easy to see im wrong but i believe it is being used as a metaphor for explaining Gods infinence and imensity in that his view of time is not human but that he looks down on time as if all of time is on a 2d timescale. So there is no real way to determine if he means 120 2nd millenium years or if he was using a totally different set of meaning.

    This message is a reply to:
     Message 1 by thestickman, posted 12-05-2002 10:00 AM thestickman has not replied

    Replies to this message:
     Message 106 by ringo, posted 08-12-2007 10:10 PM carnutter23 has not replied

      
    Newer Topic | Older Topic
    Jump to:


    Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

    ™ Version 4.2
    Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024