quote:
Yes, to men together, in appearance to me, is more gross than two women.
Right, and that should maybe help you realize that your reaction is irrational and partly culturally (which includes religion) based.
quote:
But you are blending issues once again.
How I feel about the appearance of either, has nothing to do with homosexual marriage in the state.
Really, I'm not, becasue we have most recently been talking about you telling your kids that homosexuality is wrong and sinful.
quote:
I don't hate anyone, as I have stated several times, I will never understand the attraction between two members of the same sex, male or female.
I don't hate anyone, as I have stated several times, I will never understand the attraction between two members of different races.
If we are going to debate any further in the future, you are going to have to take my words at face value, and stop this BS of trying to find out what was meant. women seem to do that a bit too much.
Too funny, rat, just too funny.
I nearly
always take your words at face falue. Then, when I respond to what you say and only what you say, you complain that I don't "get it" and that what you "really" meant to say was something else. That "something else" sometimes makes no sense when compared to what you originally said, or blatantly contradicts it, or similar.
I'm not the only one who has this experience with you. Remember Rhavin telling you that what you very much appeared to be saying was one thing, and that was why several people responded to you as though you were saying that thing, but then you came back and said "that's not what I meant"?
If everybody else on a thread all "hear" the same thing from you, and it is not your true position, then one or both of the following is happening:
1) You are not communicating your ideas well at all, which is not our fault, and it is up to you to be clearer.
2) You
are, in fact, communicating very clearly, but when your argument is shredded or criticised or reflects poorly on you, you try to spin it or amend it after the fact instead of defending it. That is disingenuous.
In your case, it appears to be a combination of each.
Edited by nator, : No reason given.