Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,760 Year: 4,017/9,624 Month: 888/974 Week: 215/286 Day: 22/109 Hour: 0/3


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Please - Some Impartial Advice Needed
nator
Member (Idle past 2195 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 230 of 240 (406697)
06-21-2007 9:26 PM
Reply to: Message 221 by Hyroglyphx
06-21-2007 5:03 PM


Re: The mysteries of life
quote:
I wonder, though, if you'd have the same outlook when it comes to murder.
"I'm personaly against murder, but damn it, we shouldn't stop people from doing it if they want to!"
Perhaps you would like to explain (in another thread) how you justify forcing women to maintain pregnancies and give birth to the infants?
quote:
But people do choose whom they sleep with.
Ah, but who you choose to sleep with is different from who you are sexually attracted to.
I mean, there are celibate people who have never slept with anybody, but they are still sexually attracted to people, and probably one gender.
I don't ever remember actually choosing my sexual orientation. I've just always been attracted to boys. That is also the case with everybody else I've ever met and discussed this with, gay and straight alike.
When did you choose to be attracted to women, juggs? Did you flip a coin when you were 10 and it came up "girls", so you decided at that moment to be straight, but you could have just as easily chosen to be gay?
Edited by nator, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 221 by Hyroglyphx, posted 06-21-2007 5:03 PM Hyroglyphx has not replied

  
nator
Member (Idle past 2195 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 235 of 240 (406762)
06-22-2007 8:36 AM
Reply to: Message 231 by Buzsaw
06-21-2007 10:29 PM


Perhaps you would like to explain (in another thread) how you justify forcing women to maintain pregnancies and give birth to the infants?
quote:
{abe.....and in the same thread how the MD's are justified in killing the children whom those women procreated and brought to be.
Start the thread, Buz, and I'll be there to explain it to you.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 231 by Buzsaw, posted 06-21-2007 10:29 PM Buzsaw has not replied

  
nator
Member (Idle past 2195 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 237 of 240 (406765)
06-22-2007 8:51 AM
Reply to: Message 234 by riVeRraT
06-22-2007 8:34 AM


Re: The mysteries of life
quote:
Yes, to men together, in appearance to me, is more gross than two women.
Right, and that should maybe help you realize that your reaction is irrational and partly culturally (which includes religion) based.
quote:
But you are blending issues once again.
How I feel about the appearance of either, has nothing to do with homosexual marriage in the state.
Really, I'm not, becasue we have most recently been talking about you telling your kids that homosexuality is wrong and sinful.
quote:
I don't hate anyone, as I have stated several times, I will never understand the attraction between two members of the same sex, male or female.
I don't hate anyone, as I have stated several times, I will never understand the attraction between two members of different races.
If we are going to debate any further in the future, you are going to have to take my words at face value, and stop this BS of trying to find out what was meant. women seem to do that a bit too much.
Too funny, rat, just too funny.
I nearly always take your words at face falue. Then, when I respond to what you say and only what you say, you complain that I don't "get it" and that what you "really" meant to say was something else. That "something else" sometimes makes no sense when compared to what you originally said, or blatantly contradicts it, or similar.
I'm not the only one who has this experience with you. Remember Rhavin telling you that what you very much appeared to be saying was one thing, and that was why several people responded to you as though you were saying that thing, but then you came back and said "that's not what I meant"?
If everybody else on a thread all "hear" the same thing from you, and it is not your true position, then one or both of the following is happening:
1) You are not communicating your ideas well at all, which is not our fault, and it is up to you to be clearer.
2) You are, in fact, communicating very clearly, but when your argument is shredded or criticised or reflects poorly on you, you try to spin it or amend it after the fact instead of defending it. That is disingenuous.
In your case, it appears to be a combination of each.
Edited by nator, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 234 by riVeRraT, posted 06-22-2007 8:34 AM riVeRraT has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 239 by riVeRraT, posted 06-23-2007 8:36 AM nator has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024