The Definition for the Theory of Evolution

Yes, that's why you often read "the theory of evolution by natural selection". Both of those gents had a theory of evolution, but only one had much explanatory power when presented with the evidence.

---

Help inform the masses - contribute to the EvoWiki today! Contributors needed for the following articles: Pleiotropy, Metabolism, Promoter, Invertebrate, Meiosis, DNA, Transcription, Chromosome, Tetrapod, Phenotype, Messenger RNA, Mammals, Appendix , Variation, Selection, Gene, Gametogenesis, Homo erectus and others.

​

Registration not needed, but if desired, register here!

Because birds aren't always in the sky (emus, kiwis etc), animals aren't always on land (fish, for example, are animals) and how does anyone determine that humans are 'fallen masters'? Well, with the above examples, we determine what things are by characteristics that only they have. Humans can go under water, but we don't become fish when we do. So, identifying things by habitat isn't wise, as you don't know whether that species is 'just visiting'.So, you define birds as vertebrates with feathers, animals as mobile multicellular organisms and so on. You don't identify a human by whether they are a 'fallen master'. Instead, the way you determine that something is a human is if it looks and acts like what you call a human - a thinly-furred, bipedal and intelligent ape (it's more complicated than that, actually, at least for a specific genus, like 'human').

---

Help to inform the public - contribute to the EvoWiki today! We seek contributors with a knowledge of Intelligent design to expand and review our page on this topic.

​

Registration not needed for editing most pages (the ID page is an exception), but you can register here!

As the others have said, this isn't the case.This particular claim is one Answers in Genesis's list of Arguments we think creationists should NOT use

quote:

---

“Evolution is just a theory.”

​

What people usually mean when they say this is “Evolution is not proven fact, so it should not be promoted dogmatically.” Therefore people should say that! The problem with using the word “theory” in this case is that scientists use it to mean a well-substantiated explanation of data. This includes well-known theories such as Einstein’s Theory of Relativity and Newton’s Theory of Gravity, as well as lesser-known ones such as the Debye-Hckel Theory of electrolyte solutions. It would be better to say that particles-to-people evolution is an unsubstantiated hypothesis or conjecture.

---

---

Help to inform the public - contribute to the EvoWiki today! We seek contributors with a knowledge of Intelligent design to expand and review our page on this topic.

​

Registration not needed for editing most pages (the ID page is an exception), but you can register here!