I will discuss/debate you on Gospel John and 1 John, 2 John, and 3 John.
I may share some of your beliefs, but I will play the devils advocate and challenge you on several key points.
I wont be totally disagreeing with you, however. It should provide an entertaining debate which shows how the literalist mindset rationalizes the bible. If you wish to have such a discussion with me, start a new PNT, label it Great Debate, and begin with a short and concise assertion concerning the 4 books of John. We can discuss theological assumptions and traditional dogma, but contrary evidence is allowed to be introduced.
Shall you start?